Professor of economics at George Mason University, fellow at the Peterson Institute of International Economics, IZA, CReAM/UCL, CEPR, CGD. Associate Editor JEP. USAID 2021–2024. Personal views exclusively.
Web: http://mclem.org
ORCID: 0000-0003-1354-0965 ..
more
Professor of economics at George Mason University, fellow at the Peterson Institute of International Economics, IZA, CReAM/UCL, CEPR, CGD. Associate Editor JEP. USAID 2021–2024. Personal views exclusively.
Web: http://mclem.org
ORCID: 0000-0003-1354-0965
Michael Andrew Clemens is an American economist who studies international migration and global economic development.
Innovation can change what migration *is*—more orderly, skilled, integrated, & tangibly beneficial to everyone affected
In 2012 I proposed one way: Global Skill Partnerships
The World Bank just released a major GSP roadmap—> hdl.handle.net/10986/42780
www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
Reposted by Kori Schake, Michael A. Clemens
www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...
Reposted by Michael A. Clemens, Henry Jones
Reposted by Kori Schake, Jacob T. Levy
www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-j...
Reposted by Michael A. Clemens
www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-j...
Reposted by Anne Applebaum, Dorothy Bishop, Simon Burgess , and 14 more Anne Applebaum, Dorothy Bishop, Simon Burgess, Mel Bartley, Gavin A. Schmidt, Christopher Wright, Michael A. Clemens, Maarten Vink, Leigh Sparks, Robert C. Richards, Aaron Sojourner, Stephen D. Murphy, Marina Costa Lobo, Jonathan Birch, Georg Weizsäcker, Nathan Richardson, William G. Wade
With @jeromevalette.bsky.social & Jesús Fernández-Huertas Moraga, we are happy to announce the CfPapers for the
4th edition of the Junior Workshop on the Economics of Migration
on May 26-27, 2026 @uc3meconomics.bsky.social, Spain.
Submit until February 1, 2026 on economig2026.sciencesconf.org
Reposted by Rosemary A. Joyce, Aaron Sojourner
…is happening almost entirely among girls, not boys.
At some point maybe men will start trying harder to understand that.
www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/... | HT @conradhackett.bsky.social @pewresearch.org
arxiv.org/pdf/2508.21536
Reposted by Lawrence F. Katz, Dan Goldhaber, Will Jennings , and 12 more Lawrence F. Katz, Dan Goldhaber, Will Jennings, Brendan Nyhan, Scott L. Greer, Michael A. Clemens, Nathan Nunn, Jason N. Doctor, Joshua Goodman, Aaron Sojourner, Amy W. Ando, Juan Moreno‐Cruz, Terence Wood, Evan Roberts, Peter Bergman
Reposted by David R. Miller
Reckless, filthy perversion of public office is not Conservative. It is not Liberal. It is poison to all Americans.
Americans demand leadership and honor in public service. We demand people in positions of public trust who uphold our laws, with minimal wisdom & humanity.
Nothing partisan. Conservative & Liberal Americans reject authoritarian rule.
Reposted by John McLaren, Aaron Sojourner
nlgmltf.org/military-law...
When this fact was stated by a group of public servants (+veterans), the US President promised to EXECUTE them. By hanging.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/20/u...
Americans reject dictatorship.
Reposted by David R. Miller
In 1918, Teddy Roosevelt said:
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Reposted by Aaron Sojourner, Maria Abreu
This remarkable new resource from @niskanencenter.bsky.social maps the US counties where the economic benefits of immigration might be highest —>
www.niskanencenter.org/mapping-amer...
This is not difficult, and Conservative and Liberal Americans overwhelmingly agree on it. We are sick of extremists and their cowardly lies.
But ask yourself why even attempting to do this was a policy priority, at the highest levels of Homeland Security, in the first place.
Nazism is not Conservative. It's poison for all of us.
Yet the Administration kneecaps university after university under the tissue-thin pretext of rooting out 'antisemitism'.
The extremists twisting this very plain language in knots could instead simply amend the Constitution.
They're doing this because they know they'd fail.
Lower courts already ruled unequivocally on this point and there is no need for SCOTUS to be debating this at all.
Presidents who do not like what the Constitution says can propose amending it.
Reposted by Maria Abreu
I joined with 95 other social scientists to document the costs of this act for the United States.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Reposted by Christian Odendahl, Will Jennings, Richard Betts , and 16 more Christian Odendahl, Will Jennings, Richard Betts, Christopher Wright, Tim Bale, Michael A. Clemens, Monika Schnitzer, Leigh Sparks, Paul E. Johnson, Peter Holmes, Iikka Korhonen, Robert Wolfe, Michael H. Whitworth, Anne Norton, Graham Dutfield, Nils Zurawski, Catriona Seth, Andrew Duff, Nathan P. Kalmoe
In other words, the Dept. of Homeland Security is fabricating economic claims flatly contradicted by econ research.
Reposted by Tomasz Mickiewicz
This is because it removes a crucial ingredient of production in key sectors like food and construction, without reducing demand much.
Sane demand chasing reduced supply —> higher prices. @piie.com analysis here: