Simon Lewis
banner
simonlewis.bsky.social
Simon Lewis
@simonlewis.bsky.social

They say I’m outspoken. Professor of Global Change Science at UCL and University of Leeds. Author, The Human Planet. Trying to understand the world and change it too.

Simon Lewis may refer to:Simon Lewis (writer), British novelist and screenwriter Simon Lewis , a character in The Mortal Instruments series of novels Simon Lewis, director of communications for PM Gordon Brown Simon Lewis Simon Lewis (lifeguard), Australian volunteer lifesaver .. more

Environmental science 69%
Geography 18%
I’m a past winner of the Orwell Prize & won partly because I exposed Vote Leave’s unlawful activities.

Michael Gove was its co-convener & refused to answer a single q. He’s now a judge of the prize & our world is truly one that Orwell would recognise

bylinetimes.com/2025/11/25/m...
Michael Gove Made Orwell Prize Judge Despite Record of Attacking Journalists and Dodging Scrutiny
Critics say "Orwell would have enjoyed the irony" of the former Conservative minister's appointment
bylinetimes.com

Reposted by Simon L. Lewis

Quite the quote on #COP30, by Professor Michael Jacobs of the think tank ODI Global and the University of Sheffield. Source: ‚Backchannel‘

Indigenous protected areas have much lower deforestation rates than other areas, so lowering emissions from deforestation (second largest cause climate change after fossil fuel emissions).

Huge applause and long standing ovation for Marina Silva, what a life, from rubber tapper in the Amazon to environment minister, and quiet star of COP30. Even though the roadmap to halt deforestation is voluntary, if led by Silva, it will be positive.

Fucked/not fucked is not a binary, many shades here. There is no global ‘we’.

Eg 14 new indigenous territories to be demarcated, announced during COP, as a result of indigenous organization/ protest /international spotlight/ Lula gov. These indigenous cultures ‘less fucked’ now + going forward.

This is just a weird take. There is a palpable lack of optimism here — literally not one person applauded the gaveling of the cover text today — more like keeping a focus on climate and a focus on multilateralism alive. It’s all deeply flawed, but we both know that.

Global CO2 emissions increased 18.4% in the 10 yrs prior to the Paris Agreement, and 1.2% in the 10 years after. The graph is clear, there is an inflection point, see in this doc. ca1-eci.edcdn.com/reports/10-Y.... Today’s deal is really poor. But international agreement on climate do have impacts.

COP30 cover text passed with silence. No applause. Just silence.

Presidency then announced 2 roadmaps, under the Presidency, one on transitioning away from fossil fuels and another on deforestation. To huge applause. Basically a coalition of the willing.

Reposted by Keith C. Hamer

Cover decision text, not passed yet, unfccc.int/sites/defaul...

No mention of roadmaps for transitioning away from fossil fuels or curbing deforestation.

Bitterly disappointing.
unfccc.int
Final document for #COP30 just dropped and here are some hot takes

1/ No decisive language about FF phaseouts. This is a HUGE loss. The consolation prize is a political process toward phaseouts outside the official decisionmaking of the #ParisAgreement
unfccc.int
A climate deal without explicit language calling for a fossil fuel phaseout is like a ceasefire without explicit language calling for a suspension of hostilities.
#COP30

COP30 final plenary starting very soon, but still no new cover text release

Pre Paris emissions lead to 4C warming by 2100. Today, 2.5 C. Not nothing.

Agree on changing strategies as the world changes, of course.

Given fascism and authoritarianism are on the rise. Why do you focus on the climate talks — multilateralism — as a key problem. Seems odd to me.

There is so little hope here. Just a grim determination to make some progress and not hand a victory to Trump and his allies by showing multilateralism to be failing.

Because a world where only might is right is fundamentally worse.

Likely a fairly weak agreement but the process and multilateralism survives another day. No small thing these days. But needs something on fossil fuels to retain credibility. Needs to tackle the actual problem.

Then the president can trade these off to craft an agreement that Brazil can sell as ambitious (compared to today), and countries can say they got something (compared to today).

What’s going on at COP30. The new draft cover text is poor, nothing of fossil fuels or forests, but something, not much, on finance. Here in my take: this is deliberately low-balled, to flush out what’s really important to blocks of countries.

COP30 President determined to keep all negotiations private. Ministers+1 only meeting now.

COP30 President calls plenary. Gives pep talk. Mic drop. Leaves. Now in the centre of this media scrum.

Waiting for the COP30 plenary, and it’s full, no suprise, because there seems to be no overflow room to show it. Very poor planning from the hosts.
You ever just sit down and realize that the rise of 21st century fascism is capital's answer to climate change?

Jokes aside the fire at COP30 is bad news for the hosts. And that means bad news for multilateralism. The clock is ticking.

Fire at COP30, we are all evacuated. Hope everyone is ok.
Everyone evacuated from #CoP30. Is this nature screaming for help?

Reposted by Simon L. Lewis

Everyone evacuated from #CoP30. Is this nature screaming for help?
The CDC website now disseminates disinformation about vaccines, claiming erroneously that infant vaccines might cause autism, when we know conclusively that they do not. It is difficult to overstate just how dangerous this is. www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safe...

I do wonder if do Lago the COP30 President is telling each country to come to agreement early, to give Trump the middle finger, without any one country needing to take the blame. Would be amazing to wrap the contentious issues early when the US is not there. I can but dream!