Elizabeth N. Saunders
banner
profsaunders.bsky.social
Elizabeth N. Saunders
@profsaunders.bsky.social

Professor of Political Science & Director of the Saltzman Institute of War & Peace Studies, Columbia. New Book: The Insiders' Game: How Elites Make War and Peace https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691215808/the-insiders-game .. more

Biology 52%
Environmental science 20%
Pinned
Hard to think through problems when we are in a mode where the current problem gets eaten by a bigger problem within hours.

Except insofar as he seems to be a voice against using large-scale force. Or maybe that's just in Ukraine?

Also, no Vance?

Team of Rival Murderers
Trump to hold a meeting on Venezuela this evening with Rubio, Hegseth and the Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, CNN reports.
"We will call the 12th month of the year 'December'... which means 'tenth month.'"

Reposted by Elizabeth Saunders

Trump to hold a meeting on Venezuela this evening with Rubio, Hegseth and the Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, CNN reports.
”‘They want the international stabilizing force to come into Gaza and restore, quote unquote, law and order and disarm any resistance,‘ a senior official in Indonesia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. ‘So that’s the problem. Nobody wants to do that.’” www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/1...
International force at heart of Trump’s Gaza plan struggles to find takers
The U.S. administration is trying to drum up troop commitments, but concerns are mounting over whether foreign soldiers would have to use force against Gazans.
www.washingtonpost.com

Was thinking audience costs. Not sure they really matter to an already-unpopular and shameless Trump who might not want the belligerence costs his base could inflict if he attacks. @jkertzer.bsky.social thoughts?

See second post

Reposted by Elizabeth Saunders

totally share this sense of the crazy.

it's also important to recognize that the administration is *already* in violation of the UN Charter: the military buildup & intimidation clearly constitute a threat of force ag the territorial integrity or political independence of Venezuela.
Not a Latin America specialist, but still kind of amazed at the incoherence of signals coming out of DC amid open-source reporting on flights/airspace and on countries evacuating citizens from Venezuela. Is attacking a live option? What's the offramp/deal for Maduro? Who's in charge of US policy?

Mini-thread in which I convince myself that maybe we aren't going to war against Venezuela and maybe the odds were not that high to begin with?
One of his (very few) longheld beliefs is not starting forever wars, which VZ could become. He only does bombing, and only when it seems easy/a "winner" (Iran '25 and he was uncertain til the end). To stop VZ, show a boots on the ground option. He's no dove but starting a brand new war seems...odd.

Always a risk and nothing would surprise me. But this is a huge country.

Dunno, starting to wonder if odds were ever that high that we were going to start a full blown attack on Venezuela. Take that prediction for what it's worth in light of my very wrong prediction about Iran! But there, Israel cleared the way for him to think it would be easy. Harder to do that here.

So much so that it's hard to think about how Maduro updates his beliefs here. This isn't calculated madman theory (doesn't work, hard to pull off, see @proftalmadge.bsky.social on this). Leaves a lot of offramps he can spin. Caught bluffing, yes, egg on Rubio's face, yes, but does Trump care?

One of his (very few) longheld beliefs is not starting forever wars, which VZ could become. He only does bombing, and only when it seems easy/a "winner" (Iran '25 and he was uncertain til the end). To stop VZ, show a boots on the ground option. He's no dove but starting a brand new war seems...odd.

Damn right
Mark Kelly: “Pete Hegseth is not a serious person. He’s unqualified for this job. I think he is the least qualified Secretary of Defense in the history of our country by far. & this President thinks he can bully & intimidate people? He’s not gonna stop me from speaking out & holding him accountable”

As in, I wonder if the odds of war have been very low all along. Then again, I said on a public webinar that Trump wouldn't bomb Iran 2 days before he did just that, so my wondering doesn't get very far!

I actually wonder if any real war plan has been presented to him. As opposed to extreme plans that he'd never choose.

Reposted by Daniel W. Drezner

One weird trick diplomacy. You'd think we'd have learned, but you'd be wrong.
There are several Chalabi-types whispering in the eager ears of Rubio and the Miami crowd that this “one neat trick” is going to to be the thing that incite the people to rise up against Maduro. And when that doesn’t work they escalate to the next thing, like the NFZ.

Reposted by Elizabeth Saunders

There are several Chalabi-types whispering in the eager ears of Rubio and the Miami crowd that this “one neat trick” is going to to be the thing that incite the people to rise up against Maduro. And when that doesn’t work they escalate to the next thing, like the NFZ.

Nothing like watching a rare real-world test of a cottage-industry theory unfold, while the fate of millions hangs in the balance.

Reposted by Daniel W. Drezner

Well ok then
President Donald Trump said Sunday that people shouldn’t read much into a social media post where he said Venezuelan airspace should be considered closed
Trump Downplays Venezuelan Airspace Threat as US Mulls New Steps
President Donald Trump said Sunday that people shouldn’t read much into a social media post where he said Venezuelan airspace should be considered closed.
bloom.bg

On the plus side, the range of outcomes is so big it includes almost any concession allowing Trump to TACO and take those naval assets home!

That's the thing. In Iraq, it was clear that admin was very likely to attack (you could assign a high probability). Starting a war like this, even if just bombing, is bigger than anything Trump has done; maybe real odds were always low. But no steps to bolster signals. It's incoherent, not madman.

Or, is either of these logics too strategic for this lot? Always a possibility!

Also trying to think through whether Hegseth news makes attack more or less likely (to be clear, none of it changes the illegality of the boat strikes and the double-tap being a war crime if he ordered it). Does it make Trump more likely to back off, or to attack so it gets lost in "we're at war"?

Miller? Also, would we know in this info environment if Trump had authorized an attack? Does Trump even know what all the options are?

Yes, very, very different.

Are we about to attack Venezuela? I have questions 👇
Not a Latin America specialist, but still kind of amazed at the incoherence of signals coming out of DC amid open-source reporting on flights/airspace and on countries evacuating citizens from Venezuela. Is attacking a live option? What's the offramp/deal for Maduro? Who's in charge of US policy?

Reposted by David H. Kaye

Not a Latin America specialist, but still kind of amazed at the incoherence of signals coming out of DC amid open-source reporting on flights/airspace and on countries evacuating citizens from Venezuela. Is attacking a live option? What's the offramp/deal for Maduro? Who's in charge of US policy?