Political scientist. Scholar of race, religion, and American politics.
Reposted by Nazita Lajevardi
Reposted by Simon Hix, Lisa W. Fazio, Gordon Pennycook , and 13 more Simon Hix, Lisa W. Fazio, Gordon Pennycook, Brendan Nyhan, Mark J. Brandt, Richard Fletcher, Caroline Krafft, Catherine E. De Vries, Alexander Wuttke, John Holbein, Janne Tukiainen, David R. Miller, Nazita Lajevardi, Nikolay Marinov, Georg Weizsäcker, Anita Gohdes
Reposted by Anna O. Law, Staffan I. Lindberg, Brendan Nyhan , and 12 more Anna O. Law, Staffan I. Lindberg, Brendan Nyhan, Mary Feeney, Robert C. Richards, Alan Richardson, David R. Miller, Nazita Lajevardi, Ann Bartow, Henrik Skaug Sætra, Cullen S. Hendrix, Alexandra Cirone, Olivier Mannoni, Nathan P. Kalmoe, Colin Woodard
Reposted by Nazita Lajevardi
Reposted by Fabián Muniesa, Nazita Lajevardi, Nathan P. Kalmoe
Reposted by Nazita Lajevardi, David Darmofal
Reposted by Nazita Lajevardi, Nathan P. Kalmoe
Reposted by Juan Cole, Nazita Lajevardi, Nathan P. Kalmoe
Reposted by Nazita Lajevardi
Reposted by Anna O. Law, Nazita Lajevardi
Reposted by Nazita Lajevardi
Reposted by Anna O. Law, Nazita Lajevardi, Nathan P. Kalmoe
Reposted by Jennifer Dill, Maya Sen, Nazita Lajevardi , and 1 more Jennifer Dill, Maya Sen, Nazita Lajevardi, Simon Lester
Reposted by Aaron Sojourner, Nazita Lajevardi, Manisha Sinha
Reposted by Dani Rodrik, Stephen M. Walt, Cas Mudde , and 51 more Dani Rodrik, Stephen M. Walt, Cas Mudde, Ben H. Ansell, Jan W. Mueller, Guntram B. Wolff, Christian Odendahl, Richard S.J. Tol, Colin F. Camerer, Robbert Sanderman, David Brady, Gabriel Felbermayr, Steven Van de Walle, Tomasz Mickiewicz, Alistair Munro, Michael A. Clemens, Cyrus Samii, Lucas Leemann, Francesco Saraceno, Laia Balcells, Andrew Curry, Paul Lehmann, Guy Grossman, John Mullahy, Joshua Goodman, David Dorn, Ingo Rohlfing, Daniel W. Drezner, Iikka Korhonen, Robert C. Richards, Aaron Sojourner, Daniel Huppmann, Julia Lynch, Rita Hamad, Stephen D. Murphy, Nazita Lajevardi, Stacy D. VanDeveer, Miguel Á. Malo, Henry Farrell, Dean Eckles, Maria Abreu, Dana R. Fisher, Jason Lyall, Brian Weatherson, Brooke Harrington, Bård Harstad, Christina Pagel, Jürgen Janger, Nicolai von Ondarza, Karsten Mäuse, Dietmar Fehr, Bartosz Bartkowski, Adam Tooze, Anita Gohdes
Reposted by Daniel W. Drezner, David R. Miller, Nazita Lajevardi
Reposted by Nazita Lajevardi
Reposted by Anne Applebaum, Joanna Bryson, Joe R. Feagin , and 44 more Anne Applebaum, Joanna Bryson, Joe R. Feagin, Brendan Nyhan, Jesse H. Kroll, Patrick A. Jansen, Daniel L. Millimet, David Feldman, Eric Goldman, Fabián Muniesa, Jacob Montgomery, Bruce D. Baker, Juan Cole, Erwin Dekker, Sanford F. Schram, John Foot, Devon Greyson, W. Andy Knight, Nazita Lajevardi, Stacy D. VanDeveer, Scott A. Imberman, Caroline Fohlin, Florian Keller, Michael D. McDonald, Jason Lyall, Kate Starbird, Victor Pickard, Thomas Masterson, Nils Zurawski, Nelson Flores, Henrik Skaug Sætra, Arlene Stein, Federica Genovese, Richard M. Carpiano, Olivier Jourdan, Klaus Oschema, Meredith Farkas, Brandon Whitcher, Daxton R. Stewart, Albin Wagener, Nicole Guenther Discenza, Manisha Sinha, Aviel Roshwald, Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò, Nathan P. Kalmoe, Bruce Buchan, Southern Africa
Reposted by Juan Cole, Nazita Lajevardi
Reposted by Gordon Hodson, Mark J. Brandt, Nazita Lajevardi
Reposted by Anna O. Law, Nazita Lajevardi
![Thus, it is no surprise that, when presented with even
more uncontroverted evidence by the State-Plaintiffs about the
need for an injunction of the current breadth, the District Court
again found that a narrower injunction would leave unremedied
"administrative and financial harms." We therefore decline to
conclude that the District Court has abused its discretion in
fashioning relief. See Philip Morris, Inc. v. Harshbarger, 159
F. 3d 670, 680 (1st Cir. 1998) (explaining that "[als a general
rule, a disappointed litigant cannot surface an objection to a preliminary injunction for the first time in an appellate venue"
because doing so deprives the district court of the opportunity to
"consider [the objection] and correct the injunction if necessary,
without the need for appeal" (quoting Zenon, 711 F.2d at 478)).](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreiezb673t2juz5htmit7dci7dp2cxrtcljxmfqcsymgqqquoolbglq@jpeg)
![SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 25A326
KRISTI NOEM, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL. v. NATIONAL TPS ALLIANCE, ET AL.
ON APPLICATION FOR A STAY
[October 3, 2025]
In March of this year, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entered a preliminary order postponing the effective date of the Secretary of Homeland Security's decision to remove "temporary protected status" (TPS) from Venezuelan nationals living in the United States. See 8 U.S. C. §1254a; 5 U.S. C. §705.
In May, this Court stayed that order while the Government appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ultimately affirmed the District Court's preliminary order. Last month, the District Court entered final judgment in respondents' favor, holding unlawful and setting aside the Secretary's actions effectuating her decision— namely, her vacatur of a pending extension of TPS for Venezuelan nationals, and her termination of that status itself.
See 5 U. S. C. §706(2). (The District Court also concluded that the Secretary unlawfully vacated a TPS extension for Haitian nationals. The Government now seeks to stay the portions of the District Court's judgment pertaining to Ven-ezuela, but not Haiti. See Application 7, n. 6.)
The application for stay presented to JUSTICE KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is granted. Although the posture of the case has changed, the parties' legal arguments and relative harms generally have not. The same result that we reached in May is appropriate here.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreifwdli7xxfny6ivyfuusq7lptvsyntu7ypokqdyrgpoxlyw4dmokq@jpeg)
