David Spurrett
@doctorspurt.bsky.social
1.8K followers 1.3K following 600 posts

Philosopher, working on evolution of mechanisms of action selection, and their variously situated subversion. https://davidspurrett.com/

Philosophy 23%
Psychology 21%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
doctorspurt.bsky.social
Hello new followers. I'm a philosopher of cognitive science working on a book called 'Engines of Hostility'. Recent papers that inform the book are:
(1) "Hostile Scaffolding" (Timms & Spurrett)
(2) "Fashioning Affordances" (Spurrett & Brancazio)
(3) "On Hostile and Oppressive Affective Technology."

doctorspurt.bsky.social
The idea is that the exercise does a few things. One is to incrementally (but inexorably, if you follow the rules) take things off the to do list. The other is to provide an unambiguous and unique answer to the question 'what should I fix next?'. Finally, it provides a simple progress metric.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I'm pleased to hear it, Chris!

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I've recently imposed it on myself for a book I've been revising and fiddling with in too many places at once. So I'm taking a big dose of my own medicine. It isn't always fun, but it does focus the mind. /fin

doctorspurt.bsky.social
The idea is that pages don't have to be perfect, but good enough to let go of them. (If you finish 'early' you can go back and polish.)

This seems to help in some cases, especially with those stuck in a 'choose your own adventure' exposition with undecided choice points in many places.

/4

doctorspurt.bsky.social
4. You can add pages, in order, to the bottom of the pile.

5. But once a page is in the pile you can't take it back.

So start at the beginning, and see how many pages you have. Then try to move forward through the text, keeping ahead of the reader, and never back-tracking.

/3

doctorspurt.bsky.social
2. They will start with the title page, and move to the first page of chapter 1. They will read each page once, and only move forward.

3. The dissertation/thesis doesn't have to be complete when the reader starts.

/2

doctorspurt.bsky.social
Big projects like dissertations invite having many incomplete/pending bits in many places. That can make it hard to organise finishing them. When I'm advising students, I sometimes suggest the following:

1. Imagine someone is going to start reading a paper copy.

/1.
jeremymberg.bsky.social
I have been trying to get this published as an op-ed, but I am going to post it here since I think it is timely in light of the "consent" extortion events.

Deafening Quiet from the Scientific Establishment

jeremymberg.github.io/jeremyberg.g...

1/14
jeremymberg.github.io
estherschindler.bsky.social
I just saw someone use the abbreviation “AI;DR” and I’ll be laughing for a while.
chadbourn.bsky.social
Palantir has pulled out of involvement with the UK Digital ID card, according to an interview with their UK CEO on Times Radio. They’re concerned about the reputational damage of being involved with an unpopular Starmer policy.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I think Kevin's worry (or part of it) is that designers without addiction related intention might amplify/create addiction while trying to 'improve design'. I think that probably does happen sometimes. And design can generate non-addiction bad stuff (like junk and 'ultraprocessed' food).

doctorspurt.bsky.social
Also worth noting (social media feeds come up a lot among the replies) that (a) it is sometimes the same designers (gambling machine designers are UI designers for hire, and executives move between companies, or companies operate in both markets) and (b) the very same inventions/patents get adopted.
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
A lot of tech bros who were upset about pronouns want to confer them on their computers now that they’re dating
cjdenial.bsky.social
Can we stop calling an artificial representation of a person by a human-coded name? "She" does not exist. "She" is a reflection of someone's ingenue dreams, but "she" is pixels and code.
opinion.bloomberg.com
Tilly Norwood raises the question of who will be the first to win an Oscar for best AI in a leading role

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I think casinos and gambling machine designers know very well that addicts are their most profitable users. (Like oil companies are aware of the consequences of their business model.) Not saying all addiction amplifiers are knowing, mind you.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
Some 'design' is dumb luck. Flue-curing of bright leaf tobacco made lung inhalation possible. Possibly the biggest single factor in the addictiveness of cigarettes. But they were "trying" to reduce fire loss in curing. If "designed to" is about intention, not all addiction amplifiers are intended.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I think there sometimes is, because some designers know that their product is addictive, and are trying to enhance that. The documents revealed in the course of litigation against cigarette companies showed that, as does Schüll's work on gambling ("Addicted by Design").

doctorspurt.bsky.social
I don't think that we should allow that anything can be addictive. (Clean air? Safe drinking water? Cabbage? Public libraries? Toothbrushes? Pedestrian crossings?)

doctorspurt.bsky.social
For more direct answers, I'd suggest @don-rosseconomist.bsky.social "Addiction is socially engineered exploitation of natural biological vulnerability" (2020) or the Glackin, Roberts, Krueger "Out of our heads: Addiction and psychiatric externalism" (2021) both in Behavioral Brain Research.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
Re 'scientific', it's sometimes tricky because at least two centres of gravity are in play, one being empirical coherence (in neuroscience, psychiatry, etc.) and another being more overtly normative (guiding public health, policy formation).

doctorspurt.bsky.social
A clear contrast case is lowering price and/or improving functionality of beneficial infrastructure, like public transport, where resulting increased use (due to more & better routes, improved accessibility, lower prices) has no harms/downside, or withdrawal, or conflict over use.

doctorspurt.bsky.social
Not synonyms, I think, even if a difference of degree. Addictive consumption is associated with strong motivation despite harms, difficulty stopping even when motivated to, withdrawal symptoms on stopping, etc. Many design changes can lead to increased use without going there.
dieworkwear.bsky.social
Matthew 15:29-31: And great crowds came to him, bringing with them the lame, the blind, the crippled, the mute, and many others, and they put them at his feet, and he healed them after verifying their citizenship status.

scurry.bsky.social
I am so dismayed a the statement today from the President of the @royalsociety.org that I want to publish here the letter I wrote to him yesterday urging him to address the clear concerns of the UK scientific community.
Screenshot of first part of letter (continues in next image). Text reads: 

Dear Sir Adrian

I write to request that in its deliberations tomorrow the Council resolves to take a principled stand to defend the scientific values written into its code of conduct. 

In its attempts to deal with the actions of Elon Musk FRS, the Royal Society has repeatedly failed to explain how his repudiation of those values is consistent with the code of conduct that all Fellows must adhere to as a condition of their fellowship. As is now well established, these actions include attacking Antony Fauci FRS without good cause; spreading scientific misinformation on X [through his own utterances and by relaxing controls on the platform]; recklessly and unlawfully degrading the research ecosystem of the US as part of DOGE; and bragging publicly about "feeding USAID into the wood chipper", which the Lancet estimates will cause the deaths of 14 million people, many of them children under the age of five, by 2030. 

The Society’s inaction extends to the recent brief exchange of correspondence between Prof Sir Paul Nurse and Mr Musk. Although there was some initial contact, when Sir Paul laid out the Society’s specific concerns there was no reply or explanation from Musk. For reasons that I’m afraid I cannot fathom, you chose once again not to enforce your code of conduct. 
Screenshot of letter. Text continues: 

"You will be aware that the sense of bewildered dismay over this affair is shared by Royal Society Fellows, medallists and journals editors, and many thousands within the scientific community here and abroad. The Royal Society still claims to speak for scientists in the UK, but on this vital issue, its inaction represents an inexplicable rupture with values that our community holds very dear. 

In all this my primary concern is has been for the good standing of the Royal Society as the UK’s national academy. As I am sure you understand all too well (given your recent remarks in the wake of Mr Musk’s ill-judged speech at the Tommy Robinson rally), the country, the world at large, and the very practice of science itself face severe challenges from technologies and populist politics that foment division and ignorance. In such troubled times, people look to our established institutions to have the courage to stand by long-held values of truth and decency. 

It is my sincere hope the Royal Society will demonstrate tomorrow that it is just such an institution. 

Yours faithfully, 

Stephen"
davidjbier.bsky.social
ICE lied about the person it shot, claiming he was a "criminal," but NBC finds that he had no criminal history whatsoever. Not even traffic tickets in 12 years! It also lied about the extent of the injuries to its agents....