(((Asa Zernik)))
asazernik.bsky.social
(((Asa Zernik)))
@asazernik.bsky.social
690 followers 140 following 4.4K posts
Israeli-American techie scum. Almost became political operative scum, hence tweeting. RP without comment equals endorsement of post only, not source account.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
An alternate take to others I've retweeted.
Yeah, this. The ADL's primary problem is not that they care about Israel more than about Jews; it's that they attack left-wing anti-Semitism more vociferously than right-wing anti-Semitism, even when the latter isn't pro-Israel (Musk, as I never tire of pointing out, unbanned Quds News Network).
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
It wasn't the ADL that made a bunch of people decide to side with Neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes because he was condemning Israel. People signed up for that dude's bigoted, antisemitic following BECAUSE he was hostile to Israel. You cannot actually neatly separate opinions on Israelis from opinions of Jews.
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
Yes the ADL has clearly decided that protecting Israel is such a priority for them they they're willing to turn a blind eye to right wing bigotry and antisemitism.

This makes them just the mirror image of many leftists who decided anti-Israel activism was SO important antisemitism didn't matter.
That's a decent sample size if you're not trying to dig into the crosstabs! ie sample bias is a lot bigger of a worry than random sampling error.
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
There's a reason most American Jews (and the Israeli Supreme Court) answer "yes it can be both"!

But the occupation creates an iron triangle (in the engineering sense). Democracy, a Jewish state, and the Whole Land of Israel: pick 2.
Open borders is not a common position, and if your standard for "is this compatible with democracy" excludes every state in the world (some of them both widely considered democratic and with nakedly ethnic immigration laws) then it's a double standard for Israel specifically.
The iron triangle is the result of practice, not theory. There is nothing magic about the '67 lines except that 1) Palestinians on the other side of them are not Israeli citizens and and 2) demographics.
As a practical matter, such a state it would be unlikely to continue to use Jewish symbols and the Hebrew language and have a Law of Return. So no.

Again, root cause vs content.

This is *why* that iron triangle exists - with the Territories, there is only the barest Jewish majority, if at all.
This is a ridiculous position that no democracy I know of actually holds.
That is the root cause of its Jewish nature, but not the content of that nature.
(The US also discriminates by nationality for immigration purposes - its lottery system forces demographic balance across different regions of the world, regardless of individual desire to enter the country. It just decided to do so in a way that's neutral in internal ethnic politics.)
Foreigners are not citizens of the state. They also do not have civil rights (notably the right to vote).

This goes double when they have not yet physically entered the country.
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
Yours is actually less insane than what's written now.
Then the iron triangle no longer applies, because those horrific measures are not compatible with democracy.

That is not the world we live in, though.
...as long as minority rights (individual and collective) are preserved and an electoral majority still wants those things.

More substantively "Jewish" than just having a Jewish majority. Generally liberal Jewish Zionists (Israeli and American) mean this when they say the two are compatible. [2/2]
America at one point decided that privileging white symbols and narratives over minority ones is unacceptable. I think this speaks well for America.

A country can make different choices - keeping an ethnic Law of Return, symbols of state with Jewish imagery, &c - and still be a democracy... [1/2]
If you make the assumption that the occupation is permanent and should be treated as integral to the Israeli system (not my view, but not a crazy position) then you're left with a binary contradiction.
There's a reason most American Jews (and the Israeli Supreme Court) answer "yes it can be both"!

But the occupation creates an iron triangle (in the engineering sense). Democracy, a Jewish state, and the Whole Land of Israel: pick 2.
Paging @aphclarkson.bsky.social , who specializes in these diaspora politics
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
I think what makes it particularly bad, is that the organizations tasked with fighting it, care more about Israel than they do about the "Jews are bringing in darkies to eliminate the white race and steal votes" antisemites who run the government and are motivated by their animus.
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
Been too long since I did a big silly ancient history 🧵so let's bring an old one back over from the Bad Place:

It's time for ::air horn:: Publius Ventidius Bassus, the coolest Roman you have never heard of and the only person to walk in a triumph first as captive, then as triumphing general. 1/
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
I am going to become the joker (will stancil)
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
My source for 20% of American Jews as anti-Zionists is this poll by the AJC, finding that 1 in 5 American Jews think Israel should be a democracy and not a Jewish state. (www.ajc.org/news/survey2...) I find this more meaningful than asking about Zionism, since the term is so contested.
Reposted by (((Asa Zernik)))
according to the supreme court, a professional, non-partisan civil service is unconstitutional
This will have a very bad outcome for democracy.
Professional, non-partisan civil service promotes democracy and is a key feature of it.
New, from me: until recently there was strong bipartisan consensus that a nonpartisan civil service was good and that politicization was bad. Now views are more divided, with Republicans aligning with the pro-politicization actions of Trump. 🧵
donmoynihan.substack.com/p/trump-has-...