Scholar

Manuel Puppis

H-index: 16
Political science 43%
Communication & Media Studies 25%

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

karpi.bsky.social
🇨🇭Greetings from Sweden, Mr. President!

( Official Response to the « Sweden (not Switzerland) » Campaign from @visitsweden.bsky.social )
manuelpuppis.ch
Is it, though?

So hard to tell these days.
adriandaub.bsky.social
And they say Germans can’t do satire
stbimbam.bsky.social
Ich bin Home Office grundsätzlich aufgeschlossen, sofern die Mitarbeiter bereit sind sich vom Arbeitgeber durch Kameras und andere Überwachungstechnik bei der Arbeit kontrollieren zu lassen. Nur so kann sicher gestellt werden, dass Arbeitszeit auch tatsächlich Arbeitszeit ist

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

repjackkimble.bsky.social
Happy Columbus Day!! I have to think that Columbus would be turning over in his grave to find that after risking his life to discover America, the Super Bowl halftime show is going to be performed in Spanish.

by Adrian DaubReposted by Manuel Puppis

adriandaub.bsky.social
And they say Germans can’t do satire
stbimbam.bsky.social
Ich bin Home Office grundsätzlich aufgeschlossen, sofern die Mitarbeiter bereit sind sich vom Arbeitgeber durch Kameras und andere Überwachungstechnik bei der Arbeit kontrollieren zu lassen. Nur so kann sicher gestellt werden, dass Arbeitszeit auch tatsächlich Arbeitszeit ist

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

brodnig.bsky.social
ChatGPT und Co fallen mit einer extrem freundlichen, nahezu schleimenden Tonalität auf - Sycophancy nennt man das

Doch wie wirkt sich Sycophancy psychologisch aus? Und welche Geschäftsinteressen stehen dahinter?

Dazu mein neuer Newsletter 👇
Super Idee, sagt der Chatbot. Ist die Schmeichelei der KI ein Problem?
Die Chatbots schmeicheln uns: Welche psychologischen Auswirkungen das hat und welche Rolle die Geschäftsinteressen dahinter spielen können
steady.page

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

j2bryson.bsky.social
We need governance– not of the technology, but of the companies creating the technology, and their wealth / financial leverage in terms of market capitalisation. This is a transnational challenge. Leaving it to one country just let it eat that country. But governments are how we coordinate on power.
manuelpuppis.ch
Also dieser neue dunkle Modus von Spotify auf Google TV ist wirklich mal eine richtige Innovation.

Endlich kann man Musik hören, ohne dass ein Bildschirm stört. 🤯
a cat is playing a record with a label that says ' lcs ' on it
Alt: a cat is playing a record with a label that says ' lcs ' on it
media.tenor.com

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

phwa.ch
Wie bereit diese Redaktionen sind, Propaganda für Faschismus zu machen…
Tages-Anzeiger-Headline: «Trump verdient den Nobelpreis» - so reagiert die Welt auf den Gaza-Deal
manuelpuppis.ch
Excellent advice for everyone in academia.
mikeananny.bsky.social
Dunno if it's helpful to anyone, but I offer this in the spirit of academics not talking enough about rejection & students sometimes not getting mentoring on the point.

A student (primary author) & I just had a paper rejected from a journal, & I wrote this reply to them sharing the news with me.
Abbreviated text of screenshot of email:

"When I get a decision like this---I've had plenty of rejections, btw, it's a common experience!---I like to:

    give myself a few days to just sit with the answer;
    go to the reviewer comments with fresh eyes and hopefully a constructive attitude;
    read the reviewer comments and classify them into 3 types of feedback: big / structural things that might necessitate fundamentally re-thinking the paper; mezzo-level things that could be addressed within the scope / frame of the project; minutiae that are easy to do (e.g., points about language / grammar / adding citations)
    for each of those, I think about:
        what do I agree with and think was a reasonable reading of the paper;
        what do I think is not reasonable / doesn't require further consideration / is something that the reviewers didn't get / is something that was particular to that journal;
        what do I *want* to work on / make the paper into / where am I willing to invest energy
    finally, with this distance and structured thinking, I think about other venues for the piece (where to submit it to next) and what kind of changes (if any!) are required before submitting to a different venue.  While it's usually good to make some changes based on reviewers' feedback (they're smart people who gave this consideration and the comments are largely thoughtful), it could be that a different venue would be a better fit and not require (or even want) the changes suggested by reviewers for the journal that rejected the piece.

I'm happy to talk about this in our next scheduled meeting / before then / any time.

And just to reiterate: I truly hope that you don't take this news too hard.  It's a very common part of this whole academia business, it's ideally how work gets better and makes stronger contributions, and it's zero reflection on your standing or future as a scholar.

    All best,
    -- M."
manuelpuppis.ch
Endlich wieder Fernsehen für weisse Männer.
karpi.bsky.social
Ich weiss nicht, was für Konsequenzen Videomodelle wie SORA 2 haben werden - aber ich mach mir jetzt mein eigenes Fernsehprogramm.

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

presserat.bsky.social
Mitgliedschaft bei uns wäre ein einfach zu überprüfendes Qualitätskriterium (Grundvoraussetzung) für die Förderung.

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

karpi.bsky.social
Ich weiss nicht, was für Konsequenzen Videomodelle wie SORA 2 haben werden - aber ich mach mir jetzt mein eigenes Fernsehprogramm.

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

mikeananny.bsky.social
Dunno if it's helpful to anyone, but I offer this in the spirit of academics not talking enough about rejection & students sometimes not getting mentoring on the point.

A student (primary author) & I just had a paper rejected from a journal, & I wrote this reply to them sharing the news with me.
Abbreviated text of screenshot of email:

"When I get a decision like this---I've had plenty of rejections, btw, it's a common experience!---I like to:

    give myself a few days to just sit with the answer;
    go to the reviewer comments with fresh eyes and hopefully a constructive attitude;
    read the reviewer comments and classify them into 3 types of feedback: big / structural things that might necessitate fundamentally re-thinking the paper; mezzo-level things that could be addressed within the scope / frame of the project; minutiae that are easy to do (e.g., points about language / grammar / adding citations)
    for each of those, I think about:
        what do I agree with and think was a reasonable reading of the paper;
        what do I think is not reasonable / doesn't require further consideration / is something that the reviewers didn't get / is something that was particular to that journal;
        what do I *want* to work on / make the paper into / where am I willing to invest energy
    finally, with this distance and structured thinking, I think about other venues for the piece (where to submit it to next) and what kind of changes (if any!) are required before submitting to a different venue.  While it's usually good to make some changes based on reviewers' feedback (they're smart people who gave this consideration and the comments are largely thoughtful), it could be that a different venue would be a better fit and not require (or even want) the changes suggested by reviewers for the journal that rejected the piece.

I'm happy to talk about this in our next scheduled meeting / before then / any time.

And just to reiterate: I truly hope that you don't take this news too hard.  It's a very common part of this whole academia business, it's ideally how work gets better and makes stronger contributions, and it's zero reflection on your standing or future as a scholar.

    All best,
    -- M."

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

pressgazette.co.uk
"I so often hear that young people are not willing to pay for news. That’s complete bullshit. Young people are so interested in the world"

How Danish publisher Zetland connected with young audiences even though it wasn't targeting them specifically pressgazette.co.uk/media_busine...
CEO of Danish publisher Zetland: 'It's bullshit to say young people aren't willing to pay for news'
Bonnier News has taken a majority stake in Danish publisher Zetland which reaches a strong base of young people with digital subscriptions.
pressgazette.co.uk
theonion.com
This is not a paid advertisement. Subscribe at membership.theonion.com to receive the newspaper and see more print-exclusive content.
ICE is hiring!
npr.org
Today marks the first day in public media’s history without federal funding. And we’re not going anywhere.

Listeners like you keep our mission alive. Protect one of the last places where America comes together to hear itself.

Stand with us today. Donate at this link: n.pr/46wamAj
watertigernyc.bsky.social
File under "Fuck, I Wish I Thought of That!"
The generals are calling them fat man and little boy because of how badly they bombed.

Reposted by Manuel Puppis

shoutingboy.bsky.social
Now I feel like we need that introduction.

"Welcome to Bluesky, m'name's Craig, I'm officially a Bluesky Elder, which means I know things about Alf I wish I didn't"
manuelpuppis.ch
Auftakt zu Tag 2 der von der "Agora Digital Transformation" und gemeinsam mit dem @bredowinstitut.bsky.social durchgeführten Zukunftswerkstatt Public Service Media / Dialogformate mit Blick auf den Hamburger Hafen
Fernrohr Blick aus dem Workshopraum auf den Hamburger Hafen

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m