Scholar

James Q. Wilson

James Quinn Wilson was an American political scientist and an authority on public administration. Most of his career was spent… more

H-index: 47
Political science 59%
Sociology 22%

Reposted by James Q. Wilson

faineg.bsky.social
“This heckin’ pupperino fucking hates La Migra,” to paraphrase from @weratedogs.com
Rate Dogs & • Follow
...
2h •
This is Chop. He was shot and killed by masked assailants in plain clothes who go by ICE. They showed up at his door "looking for migrants after receiving a tip." The son of the family asked if they could wait before entering the home while he put Chop away in the bathroom, as the dog can be aggressive with strangers.
According to the family, it is at this point that the son went to his pickup truck to retrieve his ID and a Border Patrol agent entered the home, opened the bathroom door, and shot Chop. None of the agents helped the family, who desperately tried to render aid to Chop, as he bled to death on the kitchen floor. Unsurprisingly, the agent who shot their dog then hid from them and refused to give his name. Even more unsurprising, they did not find any evidence of the migrants they were there to terrorize in the first place.
Do not open your door for these fucking losers. Rest easy Chop
14/10
CBP Office of Professional Responsibility:
202-344-1808
JointIntake@cbp.dhs.gov
El Paso Border Patrol Sector:
915-834-8400
fpfelpaso@cbp.dhs.gov
Rep. Veronica Escobar (El Paso):
915-541-1400
veronica.escobar@mail.house.gov
https://kfoxtv.com/news/local/el-paso-family-claims-border-patrol-killed-their-dog-during-search-cbp-
chrislhayes.bsky.social
Unless and until some kind of compelling legal and moral argument is presented as to why this is a legitimate use of deadly force, this is just…mass murder.
jameslwilson.bsky.social
You do have to deal with the "prerogative" stuff (in 15, I think?), which allows the executive wiggle room for the "public good," but yes, executives taking the legislative's power is peak "what Locke hated" territory.
jameslwilson.bsky.social
Yep, it was the best part of an outstanding segment.
victorerikray.bsky.social
I know it is beside the point because this administration simply wants resegregation but conferences for Black professional associations have always been open to everyone. Typically, the started as a response to white exclusion, and did not replicate that.
blmckean.bsky.social
Very bad: OSU unilaterally cancelled the registration of grad students attending the joint conference of the National Society of Black Physicists and the National Society of Hispanic Physicists. And OSU won't fund recruiting at the Society for Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science.
Ohio State changes policy on group conferences after Trump administration threats
A federal investigation into potentially discriminatory practices at Ohio State prompted the university to change its policies regarding conferences.
www.dispatch.com
bonniehonig.bsky.social
Hamas agreed to this same deal by Dec 2024. But “Baskin would soon learn that the Israelis had no intention of striking any agreement before a change of administration in Washington…”
Reminiscent of Reagan/Carter and a different hostage release…
jameslwilson.bsky.social
I agree that the story has to be about people's fundamental interests. It's a good suggestion about amour-propre/self-respect. But I think all the things he says about the self-respect/honor of peoples involve how others treat them, not their own actions abroad. So it would be a real amendment.
jameslwilson.bsky.social
"They were at risk of dying *with* starvation, not *from* starvation."
jameslwilson.bsky.social
(This is probably obvious, but the bigger issue is that the easiest way to account for universal human rights is with reference in the original position to the interests of individuals in non-liberal, non-decent societies. But that way lies cosmopolitan justice!)
jameslwilson.bsky.social
Rawls clearly says human rights are "intrinsic to the Law of Peoples" and that the "political (moral) force [of human rights] extends to all societies" (80), but how can this be, since the Law of Peoples itself only applies to liberal/decent societies? Where does the force come from?
jameslwilson.bsky.social
The best my students could come up with is that Rawls says human-rights-abusing states are internationally dangerous, so liberal peoples have an interest in pro-human-rights reforms in outlaw states. That is well supported by the text. But there isn't much I've found to support direct concern.

Reposted by James Q. Wilson

whstancil.bsky.social
Why isn’t every Democrat holding a press conference with this video, talking about the criminal army of thugs invading Chicago and the rest of the country, and the need to bring these criminals to justice? React as you would if this really was MS13 or something
jameslwilson.bsky.social
That might be the right answer to the intervention-type questions--though if so, it's interesting that human rights protection abroad is totally discretionary!

And this would still leave us the question of what grounds obligations to respect the human rights of individuals in non-decent peoples.
jameslwilson.bsky.social
Rawls experts are thin on the ground here on Blue Sky, but I'm curious about any thoughts from @blmckean.bsky.social @abizadeh.bsky.social @alasianuti.bsky.social @martinoneill.bsky.social or anyone who wants to chime in.
jameslwilson.bsky.social
I don't think he says they're required, but he clearly says they're permitted (p. 81), and I think he expects they will. They are also supposed to respect the human rights of outlaw-state foreigners (eg in war), but what in the OP requires that? Just pragmatic concerns about peace later?
jameslwilson.bsky.social
He even says a few times that liberal peoples would not be willing to tolerate any sacrifice of their own interests in order to benefit other peoples. (Sort of a "separateness of peoples" argument.) So why would they ever pay any cost to promote human rights abroad?
jameslwilson.bsky.social
To be clear, I get Rawls' idea that if a people respects human rights, it's entitled to respect, non-interference, etc. What I don't get is the idea that failure to observe human rights licenses (even non-military) intervention, nor what would motivate a liberal state to intervene.
jameslwilson.bsky.social
Rawls experts: what, in the Law of Peoples, licenses a liberal people to do any human rights enforcement at all (even against an "outlaw state")? Why in the original position would they ever agree to do that? They don't seem to have any OP-relevant interest that would warrant enforcement.
jameslwilson.bsky.social
All the Greatest Generation, World War II talk in Rawls' "Law of Peoples" hits different when almost all the people, military and civilian, who fought Nazism are gone, and we have, so far, not adequately lived up to our collective duty to replace them.
A photo of a passage from Rawls' Law of Peoples, with the underlined passage reading: "The lesson of the Holocaust is, rather, that a charismatic leader of a powerful totalitarian and militaristic state can, with incessant and rabid propaganda, incite a sufficient number of the population to carry out even enormously and hideously evil plans. The Holocaust might have happened anywhere such a state came to be."

Reposted by James Q. Wilson

freeandequal.bsky.social
In “Money as 𝘙𝘦𝘴 𝘗𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢,” @aaronjames.bsky.social proposes a conception of money as “common credit.” Private banks‘ powers of lending (and hence money creation/allocation) must be held in trust and subject to regulations in the service of public purposes to be legitimate.

#poliphil #PolTheory
Money as <em>Res Publica</em>
Our current monetary system is a public-private banking hybrid dominated by private interest, often at the expense of public purpose. This article proposes a conception of money as a “common credit” r...
doi.org
jameslwilson.bsky.social
The governor is correct that Trump's behavior is clearly authoritarian, and we all, including members of the press, should feel comfortable saying so.
govpritzker.illinois.gov
I will not back down.

Trump is now calling for the arrest of elected representatives checking his power.

What else is left on the path to full-blown authoritarianism?
Donald Trump Truth Social Post: Chicago Mayor should be in jail for failing to protect Ice Officers! Governor Pritzker also.
jameslwilson.bsky.social
My memory is fuzzy, and I'm open to correction, but I recall Blumenthal being pretty poor in the Kavanagh hearings.

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m