Lydia “Massive Prideful Female”
petticoatshrink.bsky.social
Lydia “Massive Prideful Female”
@petticoatshrink.bsky.social
480 followers 470 following 2.5K posts
Social worker, trauma therapist, mom, musician, nerdy Jew. Consummate pinko cuz I’m too commie for the libs and too lib for the commies. Married to @joelhs.bsky.social. Gotta remember to post about medieval food history and fun stuff to preserve sanity.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Lydia “Massive Prideful Female”
notice the general mood of the timeline? how everyone is in a good mood and there’s a lot less misery and dooming? how there’s a lot of “we’re going to beat these assholes”?

anyway that’s why these events are important
Man, Catholics just have really high highs and really low lows. (This is obviously the former.)
The Right Words is a luxury of those who don’t have much skin in the game. Those who do tend to be more focused on “What do you believe and what are you willing to do about it” than “What do you call it.” This is a general principle that applies outside of this specific context as well.
I agree that liberal Zionists being dismissive of Palestinians can be a problem but do you find in general that it’s Palestinians that are super insistent on people identifying as anti-Zionists? Because that’s not been my observation or experience. Generally speaking, being super obsessed with
The question is not “Is the movement worse than the institutional embrace of genocide,” it’s “Is the current movement worse than a better version of the movement that would more effectively be able to challenge the institutional embrace of genocide.”
That was my first thought. I’m not aware of routine sperm analysis being done on teenagers.
Oh yeah, I agree! I just also find it frustrating that it’s been decided that every American is either that rural Ohio farmer or a gender studies professor at UC Berkeley when neither of those people are particularly representative.
Or any number of mid-sized, uncool cities full of normies who are all turning out for protests.

*Okay, there’s a lot wrong with the Bay Area but that’s another conversation…
Thing is, Ohio has places like Columbus and Cleveland, which are also cities and also blue and also had/will have protests. There’s nothing wrong with the Bay Area but it’s weird when people act like that’s a typical urban area when there are many more like Cleveland. Or Sacramento. Or Milwaukee.
It can also make communication harder if someone has to speak in something other than their native language. To me it makes sense to require masking in public areas and leave it to the discretion of provider and patient in the privacy of an exam room.
“Disabled people,” the symbolic bludgeon wielded by the Extremely Online seem to have almost no relation to disabled people, the actual human beings that live in and navigate the real world.
Asymptomatic transmission happens but is less common than symptomatic transmission. Being outside vs. inside does not eliminate but does reduce risk. Some of this is just the reality of living in a world with communicable disease. We are always balancing caution with other priorities.
True, although I think there’s also kind of a point being made there about family curses, which the show (and Bob-Waksberg in general) is obsessed with. At any rate, it works for that purpose.
It’s such a great spoof of the male antihero phenomenon though, especially the fawning reviews lol.

I didn’t realize you were in the process of watching it. It really does stay good until the end.
IIRC she very much does mind. At minimum she certainly expressed some impatience and exasperation with everyone wanting to talk to her about her body and not her character in the Mad Men era. Even though IMO she gave one of the best performances of one of the most interesting characters on the show.
That may be true but I think a lot of people also care about men’s wellbeing. And that isn’t bad! And Americans in general are very atomized and lonely and that is worth talking about. It’s just that it matters for everybody, not just men.
I don’t know. Lonely single woman are less likely to have children, which is certainly a concern of the same people preoccupied with male loneliness. It’s that that their proposed solution there seems to be coercion, rather than supporting women in finding personal fulfillment.
Like, how do you think it makes a woman feel to constantly hear that a woman can always get a man when she doesn’t have a man and would like one? “You must really be beyond the pale if you can’t even do this thing ANY WOMAN can do.” Would you talk about it?
I think the “women can always get a man” talk is another reason we don’t hear about female loneliness. It’s not just that women’s feelings aren’t valued, it’s that it’s shameful to even admit loneliness when it’s essentially an admission of profound undesirability to the point of social deviancy.
“But women can always get a man if they just lower their standards!”

Cool story bro. You lower yours first.
It’s insane that this loophole exists butI certainly don’t expect anything to be done about it now, given that the kinds of crooks and scammers it enriches are running the country.
they’re not even checking to make sure that they contain any of the ingredients advertised. And I feel like every time anyone does a “we tested all these brands of supplement X” thing, they find out that a whole bunch of them aren’t even what they’re claiming to be at all.
We really should talk about this more. Any discussion of the value (or lack thereof) of a supplement should always foreground the fact that, in the US, anything classified as a supplement (as in neither a food or a drug) is essentially unregulated. Not only is nobody checking on things like lead
i was surprised to learn that bc most protein powders are considered dietary supplements, they basically fall into a regulatory grey area

there's no federal limit on the amount of lead they can contain and neither manufacturers nor the FDA have to prove these products are safe before they're sold
Aren’t they all eating raw liver instead of protein powders? (Or maybe they’re just saying they are).
Tbf that sentence *could* describe an OCD theme but it could describe other things too. But certainly it’s irresponsible to make no attempt at disaggregating those different things.