The Lexaprofessional
LightNews LightNews
chicargocult.bsky.social
The Lexaprofessional
@chicargocult.bsky.social
190 followers 260 following 390 posts
Posso mangiare il vetro, non me fa male.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
nslayton.bsky.social
Incredible grift. In an era where the scams are disappointing, this guy just took tech money and went all out. www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio...
Hollywood director found guilty of scamming Netflix out of $11m for phantom show
Carl Rinsch, who directed Keanu Reeves action film 47 Ronin, was convicted on fraud and money laundering charges
www.theguardian.com
December 12, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
🚨Judge Xinis finds that, incredibly, Mr. Abrego Garcia was never ordered deported in 2019. She notes that every since this saga began all the way back in March, the government has NEVER been able to produce any evidence that the immigration judge actually issued a removal order.
B. No Order of Removal Exists for Abrego Garcia No such order of removal exists for Abrego Garcia. When Abrego Garcia was first wrongly expelled to El Salvador, the Court struggled to understand the legal authority for even seizing him in the first place. At the first hearing in Abrego I, the Court inquired of Respondents’ counsel: The Court: I want to ask, though, the very specific question, if there is a final order of removal, what . . . document got this process started? There is no warrant for his arrest by an order of removal. There is no statement of probable cause. There’s no charge. There’s no report that says that anyone saw Mr. Abrego Garcia doing anything illegal or criminal. So what is the actual document that gave these officers the authority to start this process? Counsel: That is not in the record, and the government has not put that into the record. And that’s the best I can do. Abrego I, ECF No. 33 at 21:11–22. The Court continued to press counsel about the existence of a removal order and was told plainly that none can be found: The Court: Okay. So if there’s a Title 8 removal order, there would be an order of removal that’s being executed, and we don’t have one for Mr. Abrego Garcia, right? . . . Do you have that order? . . . Is it in the record? Counsel: I do not have that order. It is not in the record. Id. at 23:7–24:4. Since that time, Respondents have never produced an order of removal despite Abrego Garcia hinging much of his jurisdictional and legal arguments on its non-existence. ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 68–69; ECF No. 32 at 10, 15–17, 27; ECF No. 87 at 11–12. Indeed, Respondents twice sponsored the testimony of ICE officials whose job it is to effectuate removal orders, and who candidly admitted to having never seen one for Abrego Garcia. See ECF No. 107 at 30:16–22 (testimony of Cantú) (“Q: Based upon your many years of experience you described to us, you know what a final order of removal looks like, right, sir? Cantú: I do. Q: And have you seen a final order of removal in regard to Mr. Abrego Garcia? Cantú: I have not.”). See also Abrego I, ECF No. 234 at 46:6–12 (testimony of interim Assistant Director for ICE Removal Operations, Thomas Giles (“Giles”)) (“Q: You have not seen the final order of removal, have you, sir? Giles: What do you mean by that? Q: I mean, you have not seen a piece of paper that represents the final order of removal vis-a-vis Mr. Abrego Garcia, correct? Giles: No, I have not.”).15 Based on this, the Court concludes that no order of removal exists.
December 11, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
youcaughtscott.com
I’M LOSING MY SHIT THIS IS SO FUNNY
December 11, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
atrupar.com
GLASHEEN: Antifa is our primary concern right now. That's the most immediate violent threat we're facing

BENNIE THOMPSON: Where is antifa headquartered?

GLASHEEN: ... ... ... we are building out the infrastructure right now

THOMPSON: What does that mean?
December 11, 2025 at 3:51 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
nicklutsko.bsky.social
Looking to spread some yuletide cheer with my new song “Big Nick Christmas”
December 10, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
clickbaitrobot.bsky.social
Read Syd Little's Thoughtful Thoughts On Why Elephants Are Letting The Terrorists Win
26th Nov 2015
🔁 9 🩶 8 [url]
Read Syd Little's Thoughtful Thoughts On Why Elephants Are Letting The Terrorists Win
December 9, 2025 at 6:00 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
laurenleek.eu
I wanted dinner recommendations so I scraped 13,000+ London restaurants and accidentally discovered Google Maps is running a shadow economy. Anyway here's a dashboard and a political economy thesis: open.substack.com/pub/laurenle...
How Google Maps quietly allocates survival across London’s restaurants - and how I built a dashboard to see through it
I wanted a dinner recommendation and got a research agenda instead. Using 13000+ restaurants, I rebuild its ratings with machine learning and map how algorithmic visibility actually distributes power.
open.substack.com
December 9, 2025 at 7:53 AM
chicargocult.bsky.social
The official MySpace of Erin Brockovich ↗️
December 9, 2025 at 6:52 PM
chicargocult.bsky.social
This is really fun!
December 9, 2025 at 3:27 PM
chicargocult.bsky.social
Is it a good sign when you get a call back interview and all they want to talk about are the particular contours of your lack of experience?

Am I cooked?
December 9, 2025 at 5:49 AM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
mplsnightmayor.bsky.social
The Thing (1982, John Carpenter)
A golden retriever holding an octopus in its mouth, so it looks like tentacles
December 9, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
sky.skymarchini.net
top top top top top topppp p www.apolloacademy.com/40-of-small-...
December 8, 2025 at 4:38 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
disneyprimevideo.bsky.social
Downtown Arby's (Series, 2010 - 2015)
The Crowley family at a Downtown Arby's. They have the meats.
September 27, 2024 at 2:46 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
basalthrull.bsky.social
Texte: le calendrier de l’avent interdit Image 1: un pied de biche Image 2: un ensemble de casiers automatiques type « Amazon » situé en extérieur
December 6, 2025 at 7:24 AM
chicargocult.bsky.social
Yoink!
golikehellmachine.com GOLIKEHELLMACHINE @golikehellmachine.com · 6d
looking great, mister president, sir, no president in history has looked better at 175 years old while putting a fake medal on themselves
picture from NYT's the athletic with the headline 'president trump awarded inaugural FIFA peace prize", trump's looking old, partially bent over, he looks disoriented, his left hand is deeply bruised and he's picking up a medal
December 6, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Pope Leo with a bat
December 6, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
hollywooddfpd.bsky.social
*record scratch* Yep—that’s me
SUV initiating fishtail phase of this encounter with the governing laws of physics.
December 5, 2025 at 9:56 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
edsbs.bsky.social
Reminder
December 4, 2025 at 11:51 AM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
theonion.com
Snowy Conditions Proving Hazardous For Nations Idiots
December 2, 2025 at 6:01 PM
chicargocult.bsky.social
Seeing the amount of dust and noise generated by these guys grinding the basement floor justifies every bit they they charge
December 2, 2025 at 5:30 PM
chicargocult.bsky.social
Tag yourself! I'm the jack and Jill and Jill bathroom with three sinks
windows98support.bsky.social matt @windows98support.bsky.social · 10d
Oh shit waddup
December 2, 2025 at 3:40 AM
chicargocult.bsky.social
Luv 2 get ghosted by two busses in a row when the roads and plowed and traffic is moving
December 2, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
kissphoria.bsky.social
idk not to mention how very nuanced and normal the actual response here was
Trans Professors comment Mel Curth (She/They) November 16, 2025 at 2:04 PM Please note that I am not deducting points because you have certain beliefs, but instead I am deducting point for you posting a reaction paper that does not answer the questions for this assignment, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence in a scientific class, and is at times offensive. While you are entitled to your own personal beliefs, there is an appropriate time or place to implement them in your reflections. I encourage all students to question or challenge the course material with other empirical findings or testable hypotheses, but using your own personal beliefs to argue against the findings of not only this article, but the findings of countless articles across psychology, biology, sociology, etc. is not best practice. You argue that abiding by normative gender roles is beneficial (it is perfectly fine to believe this. but to then say that evervone should act TPUSA OU Trans Professors comment the same, while also saying that people aren't pressured into gendered expectations is contradictory, especially since your arguments reflect a religious pressure to act in gender-stereotypical ways. You can say that strict gender norms don't create gender stereotypes, but that isn't true by definition of what a stereotype is. Please note that acknowledging gender stereotypes does not immediately denote a negative connotation, a nuance this article discusses. Additionally, to call an entire group of people "demonic" is highly offensive, especially a minoritized population. You are entitled to your own beliefs, but this isn't a vague narrative of "society pushes lies," but instead the result of countless years developing psychological and scientific evidence for these claims and directly interacting with the communities involved. You may personally disagree with this, but that TPUSA OU 2 Trans Professors comment doesn't change the fact that every major psychological, medical, pediatric, and psychiatric association in the United States acknowledges that, biologically and psychologically, sex and gender is neither binary nor fixed. I implore you apply some more perspective and empathy in your work. If you personally disagree with the findings, then by all means share your criticisms, but make sure to do so in a way that is appropriate and using the methodology of empirical psychology, as aligned with the learning goals in this class. If you have any additional questions or concerns about this or would like some additional educational resources, I would be happy to discuss this further and provide you with them. 3 TPUSA OU Additional professor Megan Waldron (She/Her/Hers) November 16, 2025 at 3:09 PM Samantha, I am the other instructor for this course, and I have also taken the time to read your paper. I concur with Mel on the grade you received. This paper should not be considered as a completion of the assignment. Everyone has different ways in which they see the world, but in an academic course such as this you are being asked to support your ideas with empirical evidence and higher-level reasoning. I find it concerning that you state at the beginning of your paper that you do not think bullying ("teasing") is a bad thing. In addition, your paper directly and harshly criticizes your peers and their opinions, which are just as valuable as yours. Disagreeing with others is fine, but there is a respectful way to go about it. That goes for discussion posts as well as reaction papers. Please employ more thoughtfulness in your future assignments TPUSA OU
November 29, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
atherton.bsky.social
Before there was Loss dot jpg, Loss dot jpg was there
November 30, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Reposted by The Lexaprofessional
lukesteuber.com
Everyone stop, this is important
A black and white drawing of three dachshunds arranged vertically, each holding a different optical illusion object in its mouth, and the dogs themselves drawn as if a single line optical illusion. The top dog holds a Penrose triangle, the middle dog holds a Necker cube, and the bottom dog holds a Penrose trident. The dogs’ bodies are elongated in an exaggerated cartoon style. The artwork is signed “@IndieTheIntrovert” in the bottom right corner.
July 7, 2025 at 12:32 AM