UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
banner
lepcyrus.bsky.social
UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
@lepcyrus.bsky.social
Lord, imagine having half-an-acre of stomachache!
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
The big thing that strikes me is you’d THINK right now is the perfect time for Thomas or Alito to retire, assured of a successor that will last a generation.

But somehow I feel like neither of them are getting that assurance. Trump can’t be relied on to do the FedSoc list anymore.
December 24, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
Some of you have forgotten that only three years ago you were perfectly capable of writing a text, writing an email, telling a bedtime story to a child, and it should worry you that powerful companies have convinced us we can’t do things we’ve been doing since the dawn of time.
December 23, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
a national project can aspire to being about more than just servicing the day to day whims and caprices of one incredibly weird and demented old freak. i will go to my grave believing this
December 24, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
The time for discourse is over. The time [redacted] is upon us.
December 24, 2025 at 12:52 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
These people are so beneath our contempt. Even entering into arguments with them makes you stupider. The only appropriate [long redacted beep]
December 24, 2025 at 12:51 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
"Kavanaugh Stop" went from a skeet on here to Bluesky meme to crosspollinating over on X to Brett Kavanaugh's burner account seeing it there to a whiny defensive footnote about it in a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Juice.
Check out the Kavanaugh FN 4; I think it's pretty clear that the Kavanaugh Stop thing has gotten to him:
December 23, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
The best essay about this film that I've ever read, and I've not only read dozens, I've written a few myself. Hooray for Mary!
December 24, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
Being an incorrigible skirt-chaser even when married and possible low-grade sexual harasser? Bad! Not the same as being a pedophile!

Being close with industry lobbyists? Bad! Not the same as taking bribes!

The flattening of grey areas with outright evil is unironically part of why we got Trump.
December 23, 2025 at 6:04 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
They actually coulda had it all. Nazis 2. Jan 19, 2025 shit looked bad.

The damage RFK has done to the world with relatively less damage to his reputation shows the way it couldve

But they chose a 4chan Nazi to run PR, let King Leer do tariffs and have shown no capacity of internal organization
December 24, 2025 at 1:02 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
Ok so you might have run out of time to buy good gifts, but you still have a whole 24 hours to get *BAD* gifts, make them count.
December 24, 2025 at 1:02 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
There's an audio recording of him, not an aide, asking for votes to swing a state in a Presidential election and that wasn't enough to get him locked up or even keep him from the White House
As people comb the Epstein files for some crime they can get Trump on I’m thinking about how he was found with boxes of stolen top secret files in his possession and somehow that ended up being impossible to prosecute.
December 24, 2025 at 12:17 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
"It is logically impossible to simultaneously be evil, corrupt, and incompetent" is an absolutely amazing take to have in the year of 2025
December 23, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
A decent exercise for any media reporter right now would be to do a simple test of Bari’s assumptions here: Call the White House and DHS and ask if Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller or Tom Homan have any regrets or concerns about sending those men to CECOT. Let us know how it goes!
Here's the rest of Bari Weiss' memo. "We do not present the administration's argument for why it sent 252 Venezuelans to CECOT," and on Sec. Noem's trip "no comment from her or her staff about what her goal on that trip was... or if she had or has concerns about the treatment of detainees." LOL!
December 23, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
mvp of this movie imo is denholm elliott. every single face he makes and line he delivers is hilarious
December 24, 2025 at 12:26 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
the rich in this film are presented as greedy, venal eugenicists and it is probably a kinder and gentler portrayal then they deserve
December 24, 2025 at 12:20 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
The large-stolen-content algorithms want to be called AI for the same reason cops want to be called “first responders” - stolen valor that replaces criticism with undeserved respect
The confusion and conflation of ‘generative ai that is built on stolen artwork’ and ‘machine learning, character behaviour modelling and proc gen’ is intentional on the part of the grifters peddling the former. They benefit from murkiness of classification, because the latter predates their bollocks
December 24, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
And in large part, they find it easiest because all of these categories are the backbone of stock image sites, which are the most plentifully redundant photo archives in human history and therefore the most congenial to algorithmic purposes
December 23, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
I remember when a Canadian court ruled that Air Canada's chatbot was a representative of the company (so the company had to honor commitments it had made) and they yanked it immediately.
As a starting point I think the CEO of every company offering chatbots should be *personally* liable for all the text their chatbots produce. as though it was a direct conversation with them
How is this legal? And if it is legal, what exactly do we take a torch to it legislatively?

www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/20...
December 24, 2025 at 12:03 AM
lol i'm sorry but why is he grinding now? what does a has-been grind on?
December 24, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
As people comb the Epstein files for some crime they can get Trump on I’m thinking about how he was found with boxes of stolen top secret files in his possession and somehow that ended up being impossible to prosecute.
December 24, 2025 at 12:09 AM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
The confusion and conflation of ‘generative ai that is built on stolen artwork’ and ‘machine learning, character behaviour modelling and proc gen’ is intentional on the part of the grifters peddling the former. They benefit from murkiness of classification, because the latter predates their bollocks
December 23, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
December 23, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
Young lawyers get fired for this. If they’re not fired their lives aren’t worth living.
I mean yeah it’s an authoritarian takeover but can we take some comfort in the fact that the people doing it are INSANELY stupid?
December 23, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
the least shocking thing in the epstein files that wont get enough attention. police regularly arrest and charge victims to coerce them into participating, often jailing them in conditions that are worse.
jesus the Palm Beach Police really sought arrest warrants against underage Epstein victims for coming forward and cooperating, and (purported) admitting to crimes, and it caused the victims to become uncooperative with the federal investigation
December 23, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Reposted by UncleEraserheadBabyBilly
In other words, if you are a journalist who has access to a screen reader who has not tried defeating the redactions, perhaps consider that this administration is extremely adversarial to the ADA and thus might not have the talent on hand to avoid this particular fuckup?
December 23, 2025 at 8:28 PM