Treyf Posting 🤌
@postingtreyf.bsky.social
2.2K followers 650 following 14K posts
Haman Haymaker inventor, PSL aficionado, former baby nicknamed “Guidette,” neurasthenic vagabond, shitlib, Tikkun Olamite, Jwitter’s Vulgar Id, & recovering Jewish American Princess. Never go against a Sicilian when the chance to be petty is on the line!
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
postingtreyf.bsky.social
I had my grief counselor yesterday, so it’s not bad-bad, but it’s not great given my current hella stressed and sleep deprived state.
Reposted by Treyf Posting 🤌
oregonthedm.bsky.social
Look I've been holding off from months asking this on Bluesky because of my pride but I need help.

My car needs brakes, my rent is past due and my step kid needs shoes.

I hate having to ask this
postingtreyf.bsky.social
FUCK I missed my therapy appointment because I got handed a new work project and was DEEP in it.
Reposted by Treyf Posting 🤌
joelhs.bsky.social
Really glad to see this much needed report. The Nexus Project is the moral voice we need against antisemitism and for democratic pluralism, at a time when too many other organizations have abdicated that role.
postingtreyf.bsky.social
That’s a terrifying number.
delafina777.bsky.social
I think a lot of people (hell, me included!) are having trouble getting their heads around the fact that 1 in 7 men admitted(!) to willingness to commit CSA.

Of course, we had so much trouble reckoning with the prevalence of fathers sexually abusing their kids that we did the Satanic Panic.
jkfecke.bsky.social
If you follow this to its logical conclusion then only women can be caregivers, so we must ban them from working.

Needless to say, I reject that. There are abusive men - and women - but we should not assume all people are bad because some are.
Reposted by Treyf Posting 🤌
joelhs.bsky.social
The party of Christian values endorses shooting pastors with pepper balls.
atrupar.com
Q: We've seen images out of Chicago of federal agents shooting faith leaders with pepper balls and arresting journalists. Where's the limit for you on what's acceptable conduct by federal agents?

MIKE JOHNSON: I've not seen them cross the line yet.
Reposted by Treyf Posting 🤌
numb.comfortab.ly
I mean who could tell the difference
Mike Johnson as a muppet
postingtreyf.bsky.social
I’m also skeptical it will hold. Domestic pressure will shift now that the hostages are home. An end to the war also makes Bibi personally and politically more vulnerable (see: Israeli protests & charges) A finalized peace will, similar to the Abraham accords, likely fuck over the Palestinians.
postingtreyf.bsky.social
Debbie downer:

I don’t think the anti-war protests were that big of a factor in the cease fire agreement. It’s been in the works for ages, with talks happening continuously through failed previous ones.
Reposted by Treyf Posting 🤌
Reposted by Treyf Posting 🤌
tomandlorenzo.bsky.social
We have to do with billionaires what we more or less did with kings: strip them of their ability to control the world based on their whims and grudges
Reposted by Treyf Posting 🤌
mjsdc.bsky.social
By a 6–3 vote, the Supreme Court refuses to consider whether the 6th Amendment was violated when a juror completely lost her mind and viciously coerced other jurors to return a death verdict even though they opposed it and voted 11-1 for life without parole. www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...
On the second day of deliberations, “even when the other
eleven jurors . . . voted for life without parole” in an internal
poll, “Chancey would not even consider it.” Id., at 71a–72a.
At that point, the foreperson wrote a note to the trial court
explaining that the jurors were “‘unable to come to a
unanimous decision on either death or life imprisonment
without parole as a sentence.’ ” Id., at 9a. Chancey,
believing the note as written would result in a mistrial,
revised the note to say that the jurors were “‘currently
unable to come to a unanimous decision.’” Id., at 9a–10a.
The court instructed the jury to continue deliberating.
Chancey then “snapped.” Humphreys v. Sellers, No.
1:18–cv–02534 (ND Ga., Sept. 19, 2018), ECF Doc. 42–7, p.
443. She yelled, cursed, and screamed that she would “stay
[t]here till forever if ” that is what it took “for [Humphreys]
to get death.” App. to Pet. for Cert. 9a. She threw the
victims’ photos across the table and demanded, “‘[D]o you
want this to happen to someone you know?’” Ibid. She
reminded the jurors of the similar details of her own attack,
and told them that “‘they had to reach a unanimous
decision or [Humphreys] would be paroled,’” which was not
true under Georgia law. Ibid. She then levied personal attacks against the jurors and refused to engage in any
debate.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, jury deliberations almost
completely broke down. Screaming could be overheard from
the courtroom. One juror “‘took a swing’” at Chancey and
punched a hole in the wall. Ibid. Jurors were seen crying
on several occasions. A juror later recalled that “it was as
if an evil force took over . . . Chancey.” ECF Doc. 33–12,
p. 13. The foreperson even wrote a note asking to be
removed from the jury because of the “‘hostile nature of one
of the jurors.’” App. to Pet. for Cert. 12a. The court instead
gave an Allen charge and instructed the jury to deliberate
further. See Allen v. United States, 164 U. S. 492 (1896). It
also rejected defense counsel’s renewed motion for a
mistrial. On the third morning of deliberations, the jury
returned a unanimous verdict of death.
The above facts constitute a likely violation of
Humphreys’s Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury.
The problem for Humphreys is that these facts came to light
largely through juror affidavits and juror testimony
obtained after the trial. The Georgia courts held this
evidence inadmissible under Georgia’s no-impeachment
rule, which generally prohibits the use of juror testimony to
impeach a verdict, even in death penalty cases. See App. to
Pet. for Cert. 325a (citing Spencer v. State, 260 Ga. 640, 643,
398 S. E. 2d 179, 184 (1990)). The no-impeachment rule,
however, is not an absolute shield, and in extreme cases it
must give way to constitutional guarantees.
postingtreyf.bsky.social
My friend’s husband is in Space For e. I chatted with him this weekend. He’s over worked and wearing all the hats because so many levels of management and direct reports are civilians and on furlough.
vox-magica.bsky.social
and government workers aren’t getting paid while congress is.

so, basically, we taxpayers are funding vacations for GOP congresspeople while also dealing with the downstream effects of a shutdown.
chrismurphyct.bsky.social
5/ But here's the even darker kicker.

The House Republicans aren't even in town. Speaker Johnson told them to stay away from DC. They haven't been here in nearly a month. Refusing to show up for work. An unprecedented, unplanned 4 week recess.

And why?
Reposted by Treyf Posting 🤌
jkfecke.bsky.social
Nobody was called an anti-Semite for calling for a ceasefire. Everyone but Likud and Hamas wanted a ceasefire.
sifill.bsky.social
I can’t help but think today about how many young people were savaged on social media, branded as anti-semites and abandoned by their schools for daring to call for a ceasefire. I remember saying that it was the first time I can remember that calling for ceasefire was regarded as a hostile demand.
postingtreyf.bsky.social
As my mom said, you can’t argue with extremists.
jarredh.bsky.social
I believe you can politely argue SOME people out of their toxic and hateful beliefs. However, I also believe there are some people you will NEVER politely argue out of their toxic and hateful beliefs.
postingtreyf.bsky.social
“I don’t hate Jews, I just think blah blah blah”
postingtreyf.bsky.social
Wild how many of these idiots are pre-blocked for me by the “verified tankies” list.
Reposted by Treyf Posting 🤌
jakei.bsky.social
thank you to all my allies who call out antisemitism but for fucks sake use the words antisemitism/antisemite without a hyphen
jakei.bsky.social
jfc for the people in the back...

antisemitism is anti-Jewishness

"anti-semitism" is itself an antisemitic term invented to create a fake ethnic group defined by speakers of Semitic languages that aren't all Jewish to co-opt anti-Jewishness as a broader form of oppression against non-Jews