George Potter
@georgepotter.bsky.social
480 followers 240 following 1.4K posts
Liberal Democrat councillor in Guildford. Software engineer. All views my own. Pronouns: he/him I'm also on Mastodon: mastodonapp.uk/@georgepotter
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Gonna need to pin this to my profile.
Eli Port, 29, has been ostracised for being against all the “isms” equally, and not just whichever ones happen to serve them personally in that moment.

Read the full article AND support our hi-jinx on Patreon: www.patreon.com/posts/136382...
I mean the graph literally shows that right to buy sales have never recovered to their levels under New Labour, but sure, the Conservatives were the only ones implementing it in a way that Labour (who have retained it) totally aren't.
Do you think that maybe the fall in 09/10 was something to do with the financial crisis and that right to buy returning to near, but slightly lower than, pre-crisis levels was less to do with policy than to do with the availability of borrowing? 🤔
Do you think that maybe the fall in 09/10 was something to do with the financial crisis and that right to buy returning to near, but slightly lower than, pre-crisis levels was less to do with policy than to do with the availability of borrowing? 🤔
It's insane how supposedly "serious" Labour party apologists will come out with claims like this that are factually untrue.

Cameron didn't bring back right to buy! He softened it (in the end)! The coalition built more council houses than New Labour did, *because* they'd softened it!
Well what David Cameron actually did on housing was to bring back right to buy, which all the left wing coverage said was a right wing plot to help landlords. He also promised to sweep away affordable mandates but never got around to it I think see eg www.theguardian.com/society/2015...
David Cameron vows to scrap requirement to build affordable homes for rent
In his conference speech the PM will promise to tear up planning rules in effort to encourage developers to build more housing for first-time buyers
www.theguardian.com
For instance, by allowing us more time to spend right to buy receipts and allowing us to spend a greater proportion of them on building new housing.
Fun fact: the last government did more to soften right to buy for local authorities than the previous 13 years of New Labour.
If you're going to get the facts wrong on something as basic as this then I really don't think your judgement is reliable on everything else you're talking about.
He didn't bring back right to buy, he maintained it as left by Labour. He *talked* about extending it to housing associations, but didn't.

Meanwhile Labour is currently proposing to reduce affordable housing requirements to get London building.
And, of course, pursuing sustainable public sector finances through spending reduction and only through tax rises that don't impact the majority of people.
Building houses via the private sector, cutting NHS waiting times, increasing economic growth, pursuing market-led solutions, being tough on immigration, appeasing transphobia, being tough on crime, and just generally dealing with the issues of the day.
Barring school fees, please tell me which of this government's policies would have been implausible under David Cameron.
My point is that ideologically there is no difference between the parties on those issues. They're saying they want the same things, they're advocating the same methods, it's just that one of them is being more competent in implementation.
Planning reform: Adopting carte blanche the policy prescriptions of the developer lobby and relying on the private sector.

NHS: Increasing funding but cutting back on administrative structures.

Etc, etc.
They're things they didn't do because a) they lurched to the right, and b) they were a revolving door of changing ministers and infighting.

However, the actual goals the Tories set and the ones set by Labour are functionally identical.
Labour is a *competent* centre right government. The Tories were an *incompetent* right-wing government. Yet the actual objectives remain broadly the same.
I'm talking about their record*in* government, not the pre-election promises they made and then ditched.
Barring school fees literally everything on that list is stuff the Tories had previously proposed.
Reposted by George Potter
It's now 9 years since I saw this pinned to the wall in a local hospital, and not a week has gone by when I haven't thought about it.

Who loses one shoe?
Or did Diane only have one leg?
If they know it's Diane's, why make a poster at all?
Is it some kind of sinister threat?
The problem with this assessment is that there *is* a viable"centre right" party in the UK. It's called the Labour party.

Nothing it is doing would have been out of place for David Cameron or Michael Howard.

Which has created the space for the right to go even further right.
What we are seeing is that uk politics without a viable center right party is a shit show.

only way to save the British right is for 500,000 broadly normal professionals and homeowners to join the Tory party.

Calling on all utilitarians and consequentialists: your duty is clear.
Reposted by George Potter
It seems pointless to fact check someone saying "curry isn't proper British food like fish and chips", just like it's futile to correct someone saying "there are no pronouns in the Bible". They haven't made a mistake. What they're saying is, "Britain is a white country".
Reposted by George Potter
Shoutout to when Oppenheimer was morally conflicted because he was going to cause so many problems for Batman
Reposted by George Potter
this is obviously appalling - and he should lose his job - but it's also really quite shocking; I first met Calgie when he was a baby reporter in his early twenties and sure, he was always a Tory, but he was....fine and normal? right-wing radicalisation is out of control in SW1
A mainstream “journalist” calling for a British MP to be deported. Is it because I’m Muslim? Next time, just say it with your chest.
Reposted by George Potter
Feel like I'm losing my mind watching the media universally paint Maccabi Tel Aviv fans being banned as antisemitism - when its really about protecting the folk of Birmingham from a group of racist ultras.
Reposted by George Potter
At the start of this year, I spoke with some Observer journalists about an article they said was a going to be a huge critical piece about the likes of Sex Matters etc.

Wonder if we will ever get to see it...