They/Them (T. T. Perry)
banner
ttpphd.bsky.social
They/Them (T. T. Perry)
@ttpphd.bsky.social
Applied and translational sensory scientist. https://ttpphd.com
https://mastodon.social/@ttpphd

PFP: Sculpture of a distorted face and neck
Pinned
Grab a PDF copy of my GLMA poster:

A Thematic Analysis of Transgender, Intersex, and Gender-Diverse Experiences of (Violated) Genital Autonomy

ttpphd.com/2025/10/09/g...

#Trans #Intersex #Circumcision #Autonomy #HealthCare
GLMA25: A Thematic Analysis of Transgender, Intersex, and Gender-Diverse Experiences of (Violated) Genital Autonomy
Hello! You’ve found a PDF of my poster for the 2025 GLMA Annual Conference on LGBTQ+ Health. Authors: T. T. Perry, Julia Black, E. M. Campbell, Pallas Lysander-Romberg, Oberyn McCreless, D. W…
ttpphd.com
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
Had anyone other than Hillary run in 2016 they would have been able to easily crush Trump, the entire dem leadership knew this and *did it anyway*
November 12, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
For this #GivingTuesday I'm going to make the (biased) argument for why you might consider donating to @spritelyinst.bsky.social, especially if you care about a healthier future for the internet! spritely.institute/donate/

Here's a little thread explaining more... 🧵
Support Spritely! — Spritely Institute
spritely.institute
December 2, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
My opinion about the accommodations discourse today is:

1) Universal design. Universal design is the answer. Accommodations for everybody.
2) It's the carceral bullshit around grades and testing that makes accommodations seem like a problem. Stop doing it! Just let the carceral bullshit go!
December 2, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
marginalized people are targeted for censorship *regardless of their opinions* because the main thing people want to prevent them from saying is simply "I exist."
December 1, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
"viewpoint diversity" is bullshit because *the main danger to free speech is not the silencing of unpopular opinions.* The main danger is the *silencing of unpopular people.*
December 1, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
A college student complaining about a grade on a paper is not national news. Not even close. The details have minimal import outside the class itself.

Well-funded political activists targeting profs and TAs—in this case because they're trans—with the help of elected state officials? National issue.
December 1, 2025 at 5:31 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
A lot of what people imagine politically for this country can't actually happen under the current Democratic party. That's something that I don't see lots of people actually reckoning with. There is no way to do most of the things that some people want to do through the Democratic party.
December 1, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
One of my fundamental beliefs is that I should not have to talk to people who have been cruel to me. You might be surprised to learn how often -- and vociferously -- people disagree with me about that.
December 1, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
KOSA is never about protecting kids. It’s anti-queer and about making sure kids don’t have access to information they need to survive - from health basics to knowing they are not alone and not broken. And it will destroy the internet as we know it.
🚨‼️As of yesterday KOSA is at 64 cosponsors with @vanhollen.senate.gov + @kim.senate.gov - who claim to support LGTBQ+ rights but are clearly okay with supporting legislation that’ll censor us off the internet- newly signed on.

You know what to do: www.stopkosa.com
December 1, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
This article is essential for cis people talking about this whole thing. Katelyn got a screenshot of the student's mom flatly reposting the idea that trans people should be banned from teaching. Here's the screenshot, but you should actually read the article for the context and the story itself.
December 1, 2025 at 3:32 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
For my newsletter, I wrote about that college essay scandal that's gone viral and what everyone is seeming to miss:

It's about ATTACKING TRANS PEOPLE!!!

www.burnsnotice.com/that-viral-e...
That Viral Essay Scandal is (SURPRISE!) Actually About Trans People
A shoddy Oklahoma University essay went viral. Cis people think this is about conservatives whining for better grades. Trans people see a planned attack on a trans academic. (Note for free subscriber...
www.burnsnotice.com
December 1, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Cis people cannot be relied on to do the right thing. At all.
December 1, 2025 at 3:06 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
a lot of people debating the merits of that dogshit essay meanwhile the girl’s mom is retweeting demands to ban all trans people from teaching at any level. it’s forest for the trees shit
December 1, 2025 at 4:42 AM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
every trans person i see post about the OU suspension knows that the suspended target is trans & a grad student, & has an innate awareness that this is about purging trans employees. every cis person i see thinks the target is a rando professor & that this is about giving conservatives good grades
December 1, 2025 at 12:04 AM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
if you’re arguing about the prompt and not seeing the very real harm being done to actual people, you need to learn empathy. If you don’t see who is empowered by your attempts to be clever, you cannot be trusted. You need to use your privilege to advocate for others, not punch down
December 1, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
Levels of Satisfaction and Regret With GAHT in Adolescence

Conclusion

The findings suggest that youth accessing puberty blockers and hormones as part of GAHT tend to be satisfied with and not regretful of that care several years later.

doi.org/10.1001/jama...
Levels of Satisfaction and Regret With Gender-Affirming Medical Care in Adolescence
This survey study examines rates of satisfaction, regret, and continuity of care in adolescents who received puberty blockers and/or gender-affirming hormones as part of gender-affirming medical care.
doi.org
December 1, 2025 at 12:58 AM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
The thread covers some of this but not enough.

What it misses is that Jeffries is busy coming up with slogans while he is telling his members not to take action.

The problem is the lack of action. And keeping busy with slogans now is an error.
The problem with that slogan right now, however, is that it reads as tone deaf while everything is collapsing around us and those in charge are looting, cheating, and destroying everything. I'm no political strategist, but it feels like messaging should reflect that first.
December 1, 2025 at 12:58 AM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
Research Articles
The Cass Review: Cis-supremacy in the UK’s approach to healthcare for trans children.

Conclusion
The Cass Review can be understood as an exercise in cis-supremacy, in a healthcare system that lacks trans accountability.

doi.org/10.1080/2689...
The Cass Review: Cis-supremacy in the UK’s approach to healthcare for trans children
Since 2016 trans people in the UK, and particularly trans children, have experienced a sustained and escalating campaign to roll back trans freedoms, rights and access to healthcare. A series of l...
doi.org
December 1, 2025 at 12:47 AM
"Strong floor, no ceiling"?

Useless words, without meaning.
November 30, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
the future of public health law will shape the future of federalism. yeah that’s a good law review article
November 30, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
I wish academe had a "Run for something" for jr-mid career academics to build national pipelines for future university leadership. The worst people (generally not always) end up moving up the food chain from Dept chair-associate Dean+ the incompetence moves upwards. Uni Presidents generally stink.
November 30, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Reposted by They/Them (T. T. Perry)
I maintain that once somebody published a study, anybody can criticize it publicly, & there is no *obligation* to wait for the original authors' (OA) to reply.

1st, why would the OAs get to have the last word at every step?
2nd, waiting opens up a loophole for the OAs to derail the process.
November 30, 2025 at 5:38 AM