Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
@ianford.bsky.social
1.4K followers 950 following 7.4K posts
Recent emigrant from the Other Place.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ianford.bsky.social
Yeah - seems to be the plan. While it's good news the hostages are out and people in Gaza can start to receive aid, the fundamentals remain unresolved. Now that he's gotten his photo-op and praise, he'll probably quickly lose interest in pushing this any further. And we may be back to square one.
ianford.bsky.social
EU seems to have decided to put the squeeze on Kaliningrad - the Russian enclave on the Baltic surrounded by Poland and Lithuania which has always been a potential security liability.
aphclarkson.bsky.social
Squeezing what remains of overland rail trade and travel. Turn Kaliningrad into an expensive liability. Further increase naval and air patrols just outside its waters and airspace to squeeze its military usability. Inspections of all tankers leaving its waters
ianford.bsky.social
Trump operates by claiming he's made a *deal*, followed by a spectacular event full of pagentry in which he basks in the praise of others, declares victory and then just loses interest in the whole thing.
ianford.bsky.social
I fear that is the case. I don't see Trump having the attention span or bandwidth to concentrate on the difficult work of actually making this work in the long term. And now that he's got his photo-op and lots of praise, it's highly likely that he'll lose interest.
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
jamesrball.com
"There is a danger that everyone is playing a game here to appease an increasingly erratic Trump, who often seems detached from reality. The fear is that all sides are signing a “deal” they have no intention to keep to, in the hope that they can find a way to collapse it and blame the other side."
This Gaza deal is full of danger - starting with an increasingly erratic Trump
There is a danger that everyone is playing a game to appease an erratic Trump
inews.co.uk
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
emmalbriant.bsky.social
We will look back on those days when media researchers would critique the commercial right wing bias of mainstream media and cheer public media as an bygone naively optimistic sepia colored time... A new era of mainstream media beckons far more commercial, brutal and propagandistic than the last.
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
archiecarter.bsky.social
Attention is the most valuable resource I stg most people can’t go deep on a subject
ianford.bsky.social
Yeah -seems to be getting worse as well. A couple of bullet points is about the maximum a lot of senior people seem to be capable of digesting. As for nuance, complexity... that's dead and buried.
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
timothysnyder.bsky.social
Carole Cadwalladr was right and we’d be in a better world if more people had listened.
carolecadwalla.bsky.social
This tweet has been doing the rounds on Twitter now that Nathan Gill has pleaded guilty.

If only someone had tried to investigate UKIP & Russian interference 🧐

There’s another timeline where the Guardian supported me, doubled down on the investigation & I look 5 years younger ..
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
carolecadwalla.bsky.social
I find this very touching…& also worrying. Historian @timothysnyder.bsky.social has been an absolutely essential guide to this era. And if he thinks I’m right then we’re in more trouble than we realise
timothysnyder.bsky.social
Carole Cadwalladr was right and we’d be in a better world if more people had listened.
carolecadwalla.bsky.social
This tweet has been doing the rounds on Twitter now that Nathan Gill has pleaded guilty.

If only someone had tried to investigate UKIP & Russian interference 🧐

There’s another timeline where the Guardian supported me, doubled down on the investigation & I look 5 years younger ..
ianford.bsky.social
Turn off all the room lights, open the door to the corridor and maybe it'll fly to the light outside?? I've done that successfully a couple of times. Good luck!!!
ianford.bsky.social
A lot of those long emails (sent at 1am on Sunday night) are about covering your arse by giving you written proof that you told somebody about a problem (even though you know they never read it) and/or looking busy to impress your boss.
ianford.bsky.social
Absolutely - most large orgs have a filtering mechanism where the higher you are in the food chain, the less detailed information you receive.
You're presented with options to make a decision on.
Key is that the people who do the filtering understand the complexities & can explain them to their boss
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
davidheniguk.bsky.social
Incredible amount of China-panic over at the other place, apparently they might be trying to influence the UK away from democracy.

Funnily enough not mentioned is the other superpower whose leaders have explicitly stated their intentions in that direction.
ianford.bsky.social
Yeah -seems to be getting worse as well. A couple of bullet points is about the maximum a lot of senior people seem to be capable of digesting. As for nuance, complexity... that's dead and buried.
ianford.bsky.social
Collapsing attention spans aren't confined to school and college kids. You cannot effectively run and manage a large complex bureaucratic system like this - long term planning, managing political pressure, understanding nuance, seeing beyond the immediate crisis need people to read and write stuff
dcthings.bsky.social
Genuinely embarrassing that no senior leaders I interact with actually read anything (yes this also applies to Biden appointees). No one responds to emails, no one reads past two sentences, no one does anything. The rest of the Pentagon follows along.
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
zachsdorfman.bsky.social
This is a very important point for understanding my field. It accounts for why journalists who speak primarily to “principals” often have radically different reporting than those who are closer to mid-level bureaucrats or on-the-ground operatives.
dcthings.bsky.social
Genuinely embarrassing that no senior leaders I interact with actually read anything (yes this also applies to Biden appointees). No one responds to emails, no one reads past two sentences, no one does anything. The rest of the Pentagon follows along.
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
sjshancoxli.liberalcurrents.com
one thing that has been obvious for a while is this aspect of the authoritarian internationale: they recognize that their allies abroad are not *countries* but *political movements* within foreign countries.

time we liberals woke up and recognized this--because it's the truth.
thefred.bsky.social
Or maybe, just maybe, what was obvious in 2024 was correct: Netanyahu fully backed Trump and would not deal with Biden because Trump would give him a free hand to escalate the starvation, bombing, and do full ethnic cleansing. Which he then did, until Netanyahu embarrassed him by bombing Qatar.
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
wihorne.bsky.social
All jokes aside, this is an incredible piece of analysis & the way it concludes by motioning to the growing phenomenon of RW billionaires buying & destroying anything that challenges their regime of unchecked profit & power should serve as a wake-up call to those of us still missing the thread.
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
mcopelov.bsky.social
When authoritarians tell you they like authoritarianism, over and over and over and over and over again, believe them
atrupar.com
Trump on Egypt: "They have very little crime. Because they don't play games. That's why. Like we do in the United States with governors that have no idea what they're doing."
ianford.bsky.social
Spikes to keep the pigeons from landing and pooping all over the car.
Reposted by Ian Ford 🇪🇺 🇺🇦
darinself.com
One lesson for pro-democracy advocates currently sitting in opposition around the world -- hammer incumbents on corruption and link strengthening liberal democracy (aka accountability) to anti-corruption efforts.
ianford.bsky.social
🎯🎯🎯👇👇👇👇👇
The traditional model of journalism that operated to constrain the actions of political actors through public pressure and consequences within the framework of a democratic system has broken down.
niedermeyer.online
journalism is dying for economic, technological, and cultural reasons, but most of all it's dying because the bad guys can't even be bothered to hide their dastardly deeds anymore, because nothing happens when they are revealed
ianford.bsky.social
Sure. As an outsider, there are lots and lots of layers here that I don't get.
Just my take on things - claim no expertise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!