Topic
Politics US UK

Trump threatens BBC with lawsuit

1m

President Donald Trump threatened to sue the BBC for $1 billion in London over a Panorama segment, after the broadcaster apologized and two top executives resigned.

23%
Conservative Shadow Culture Secretary Nigel Huddleston tells GB News that the BBC should "grovel" to Trump.

Amazing how many British 'patriots' are spending their time telling our national broadcaster to prostrate itself before a hostile foreign leader
November 11, 2025 at 11:21 AM
25%
New York Times
Why the BBC Is Facing Its Gravest Crisis in Decades

The British public service broadcaster apologized on Monday for a misleadingly edited documentary about President Trump. But the scandal had already claimed two of its top executives.

Why the BBC Is Facing Its Gravest Crisis in Decades
Reposts 12 16h

Reposted by Marko Attila Hoare

3%
The Guardian
Tim Davie tells BBC staff ‘we have to fight for our journalism’ as Trump threatens $1bn lawsuit – UK politics live

Outgoing director general says freedom of press under pressure and that he sees ‘weaponisation’ Here is a round-up of what various lawyers and commentators have been saying about Donald Trump’s legal case against the BBC. Joshua Rozenberg , the legal commentator and a former BBC journalist, has said in a post on his A Lawyer Writes Substack that the corporation should settle. He explains: Given what Brito is claiming, the lawyer is unlikely to be impressed with the BBC’s assertion that “the purpose of editing the clip was to convey the message of the speech made by President Trump so that Panorama’s audience could better understand how it had been received by President Trump’s supporters and what was happening on the ground at that time”. So the BBC would be well advised to draft a retraction and apology in terms that the president’s lawyer finds acceptable. Brito is also calling for this to be broadcast as prominently as the original programme. And the corporation will have to pay compensation. George Peretz KC , chair of the Society of Labour Lawyers, says on Bluesky , commenting on Rozenberg’s blog, that the BBC might be better off with a more robust approach. So at the moment, despite @joshuarozenberg. bsky. social’s piece, I wonder whether a better BBC response would be the Arkell v Pressdram one. proftomcrick. com/2014/04/29/a. . . (At least to the extent he’s seeking more than a formal apology limited to the obvious mistake and a very modest offer of compensation. ) There is, after all, the risk of a dangerous precedent here. The BBC will often offend foreign leaders - some worse than Trump. Sometimes it will make factual mistakes in reporting on them. Yield to Trump now, and who next? Mark Stephens , a media lawyer, told BBC Breakfast that a court case could reflect badly on Trump. He said : Every damning quote that he’s ever uttered is going to be played back to him and picked over - not great PR. Trump risks turning what’s currently a PR skirmish with the BBC very much on the back foot into a global headline that the court finds Trump’s words were incendiary. . . George Freeman , executive director of the Media Law Resource Center in New York and a former lawyer for the New York Times, told the BBC that Trump “has a long record of unsuccessful libel suits - and an even longer record of letters like the one you received that don’t end up as lawsuits at all”. Christopher Steele , the former MI6 officer who is trying to recover costs from Trump after the president sued him unsuccessfully in the UK, says Trump’s latest threat is preposterous. Donald Trump’s threat to sue the BBC in London is preposterous. He remains in breach of English High Court orders in a case he brought and lost against Orbis 18 months ago. So any further abuse of the UK courts by him for such legal tourism and intimidation should be prohibited. Robert Peston , ITV’s political editor, says the BBC has been told Trump does not have a case. The legal advice to the BBC I am told is that President Trump was not meaningfully damaged by Panorama’s manipulation of his 6 January speech, and that therefore there is no legal necessity to pay him compensation. The BBC board is therefore likely to resist and fight his demand to be “appropriately compensated” out of court, and will risk him carrying through on his threat to seek $1bn in damages by going to court. These times are difficult for the BBC but we will get through it. We will get through it and we will thrive. This narrative will not just be given by our enemies. It’s our narrative. We own things. I see the free press under pressure. I see the weaponisation. I think we have to fight for our journalism. We have made some mistakes that have cost us but we need to fight for that. Continue reading. . .

Tim Davie tells BBC staff ‘we have to fight for our journalism’ as Trump threatens $1bn lawsuit – UK politics live
Reposts 20 1h
33%
Not resiling from this one iota in spite of the feeding frenzy, the resignations, and the talk of a billion dollar law suit of the last few days. If those on the right in this country seriously think that lining up with Donald Trump against the BBC is a good call, then I say good luck with that.
The attention the Tory party in the media and in the Commons are giving to this story is a reflection of just how far off the deep-end both have gone in recent times. Sure, they have a long-term vested interest in trying to undermine faith in the Beeb. But this is such a non-issue for most voters.
The BBC is apologising for its Panorama edit. It shouldn’t. First, the narrative is true: Donald Trump *did* incite the Capitol riot. Second, the apology won’t appease those attacking it. So why not at least stand for something?

Wrote this on it earlier this week:
inews.co.uk/news/world/b...
November 11, 2025 at 12:13 PM

Reposted by Alan Lester

4%
The Guardian
BBC board member with Tory links led the charge in systemic bias claims, insiders say

Sources say Robbie Gibb amplified criticisms of Donald Trump, Gaza, and transgender rights coverage, and had a lot of oxygen in the room as he led the charge in pressing BBC leadership over claims of systemic bias. The Guardian reports that Gibb, Theresa May's former communications chief who joined the BBC board during Boris Johnson's tenure as prime minister, intensified these criticisms at key board meetings before the shock resignations of Director-General Tim Davie and BBC News chief Deborah Turness.

BBC board member with Tory links led the charge in systemic bias claims, insiders say
Reposts 480 17h
44%
SUPERB and angrily unvarnished response, by former BBC chairman, Lord Patten.

"I don't think that we should allow ourselves to be bullied into thinking that the BBC is only any good, if it reflects the prejudice of the last person who shouted at it." ~AA
November 10, 2025 at 6:40 PM
24%
Biased sample maybe, but top ten from its website doesn't suggest the BBC Trump thing is getting a massive amount of traction this lunchtime.
November 11, 2025 at 12:37 PM
8%
0%
13%
Well, this is quite a serious allegation. I do hope the BBC shows true impartiality and investigate whether or not some of its Board members are systemically biased. www.theguardian.com/media/2025/n...
BBC board member with Tory links ‘led charge’ in systemic bias claims, say insiders
Sources say Robbie Gibb amplified criticisms of Trump, Gaza and trans rights coverage, and had ‘a lot of oxygen in the room’
www.theguardian.com
November 11, 2025 at 7:34 AM
31%
Yes the BBC edit was poor journalistic form but the research indeed shows that Trump's speech predicted riots, violence, and weapons use on January 6th.
November 11, 2025 at 10:40 AM
29%
I will restate my modest proposal to save the BBC: ban the BBC from covering itself.

Every BBC scandal goes huge, because every BBC News show wants to assert its independence by covering it prominently, even if several other shows already did. So it gets blanket headlines.
November 11, 2025 at 9:07 AM
19%
So Trump wants to bring down the BBC.
November 11, 2025 at 10:37 AM
10%
The BBC is far from perfect. But it is obvious that it is now under sustained assault by the far right, for far-right reasons. Every single person accusing the BBC of 'bias' is themselves extremely biased, and while they may have no comparable obligation to be... www.theguardian.com/politics/liv...
Tim Davie tells BBC staff he sees ‘weaponisation’ as Trump threatens $1bn lawsuit – UK politics live
Outgoing director general says freedom of press under pressure: ‘We have to fight for our journalism’
www.theguardian.com
November 11, 2025 at 11:47 AM
4%
The founder of Newsmax was just on the Today programme pontificating about bias. Boy, the BBC loves to submit itself to flagellation.
November 11, 2025 at 8:22 AM
18%
20%
76%
Another csse study for our #globaljournalism book 📖 www.nytimes.com/2025/11/10/w...
Why the BBC Is Facing Its Gravest Crisis in Decades
www.nytimes.com
November 11, 2025 at 3:35 AM
15%
Again - this hyperpartisan outfit paid tens of millions of dollars in defamation damages, due to its false pro-Trump claims about election voting machines. Extraordinary Gibbery to interview them
It’s already started - the BBC allows Newsmax boss to opine about bias, suggest some of the Jan 6 mob were merely innocent tourists visiting Congress, without pushback
November 11, 2025 at 8:51 AM
12%
Trump Threatens To Sue BBC Over Misleading Edit Of ‘The Vicar Of Dibley’ https://theonion.com/trump-threatens-to-sue-bbc-over-misleading-edit-of-the-vicar-of-dibley/
November 10, 2025 at 8:30 PM