This entire exercise is an absurd, imaginary world for legal experts.
That's because the truth is:
It's not an armed conflict.
The laws of war thus don't apply.
The more restrictive rules of human rights apply.
It's extrajudicial killing under that law.
This entire exercise is an absurd, imaginary world for legal experts.
That's because the truth is:
It's not an armed conflict.
The laws of war thus don't apply.
The more restrictive rules of human rights apply.
It's extrajudicial killing under that law.
1) under no definition are we currently at war with Venezuela under domestic US law
2) since we aren’t, the initial strike was just as much a murder as the follow up
The failure to understand this by a huge range of actors is really driving me up the wall.
If the Venezuelan sailors weren’t enemy combatants, then both strikes are criminal murder.
It’s that simple.
1) under no definition are we currently at war with Venezuela under domestic US law
2) since we aren’t, the initial strike was just as much a murder as the follow up
The failure to understand this by a huge range of actors is really driving me up the wall.
"they haven't released information..." what possible info could there be that would show that we're in a state of armed conflict with drug gangs?
"they haven't released information..." what possible info could there be that would show that we're in a state of armed conflict with drug gangs?
U.S. "rule of law" provides a swiss cheese defense against war crimes. only in an absolute freak accident, total system failure could leadership be guilty
Murdering innocent sailors? Legally murky, hasn't been tested in court. Double tap murder? Obviously illegal and coincidentally the Trump administration already stopped doing it
thehill.com/policy/defen...
U.S. "rule of law" provides a swiss cheese defense against war crimes. only in an absolute freak accident, total system failure could leadership be guilty
they like treating things as scandals there and are unforgiving about them, but scandal causes? cant get enough of them
It was years ago.
Did you ever racially abuse fellow pupils?
Not in a hurtful way.
Did you ever racially abuse fellow pupils?
Not with intent.
Did you ever racially abuse fellow pupils?
Not genuine abuse.
😮🫣😬😱 ~AA
they like treating things as scandals there and are unforgiving about them, but scandal causes? cant get enough of them
anyone using the term either means oppressed or culturally deficient and the term exists to bring them together under one useless tent
anyone using the term either means oppressed or culturally deficient and the term exists to bring them together under one useless tent
But actually they're just vice signaling to other elites.
But actually they're just vice signaling to other elites.
Like it is sort of a civic religious project.
The page is now updated with the results of ALL the races that were on it — from judges to mayors to school boards.
You can explore! boltsmag.org/whats-on-the...
Like it is sort of a civic religious project.
You're making up stories about people. You lack basic information about people's finances and expenses. And what kind of choices they make to be able to survive long periods of unemployment.
You're making up stories about people. You lack basic information about people's finances and expenses. And what kind of choices they make to be able to survive long periods of unemployment.
TRUMP: You have to bring in talent
INGRAHAM: Well, we have plenty of talented people in America
TRUMP: No you don't. No.
INGRAHAM: We don't have talented people here?
There's one nationwide democratic organization left. Join
Dsausa.org/join
There's one nationwide democratic organization left. Join
Dsausa.org/join
No, we need the most unconstrained presidency ever to absolutely destroy the slaveholder Constitution and deliver us from the tyranny of rural wealthy whites
No, we need the most unconstrained presidency ever to absolutely destroy the slaveholder Constitution and deliver us from the tyranny of rural wealthy whites
Even in union contracts with just cause protection, sleeping on the job is so serious that it often skips all the steps of progressive discipline.
Even in union contracts with just cause protection, sleeping on the job is so serious that it often skips all the steps of progressive discipline.
www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnb...
This is the closest we've gotten to the establishment bending the knee. We have to get all the way there (or destroy them) but we can't do that if we make shit up.
This is the closest we've gotten to the establishment bending the knee. We have to get all the way there (or destroy them) but we can't do that if we make shit up.