Ryan Robotham
ryanjrobotham.bsky.social
Ryan Robotham
@ryanjrobotham.bsky.social
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
It’s honestly so baffling to me that some people genuinely believe god created gender norms/roles. Like they really think god made it so all girls love pink, all boys love trucks, all men must work & make money, and all women must be moms. Like, gender norms aren’t even consistent across generations
Turning Point at OU posted this girl's essay in full and man is it rough
November 30, 2025 at 3:37 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
The conservative cultural project right now is to use the coercive power of the state to do affirmative action for bigots.
OU has put the professor here on administrative leave:
November 30, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
This is as good as this stuff will ever be, this is the phase where we're all supposed to be getting hooked in to this disruptive new thing. Once the free money dries up and they have to turn a profit, it will inevitably get worse and worse
"All of this falls apart if humans don't adopt the tech. This is why you've seen Meta cram its lame chatbots into WhatsApp and Instagram. This is why Notepad and Paint now have useless Copilot buttons on Windows. This is why Google Gemini wants to "help you" read and reply to your emails."
Analysis: OpenAI is a loss-making machine, how can it survive?
Don't call it a bubble! Loss-making monster OpenAI is on the hook for $1.4 trillion (with a T) in compute commitments. How can this go on?
www.windowscentral.com
November 30, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
Parents do not do this to their children, even their adult children, on accident or incidentally to their other views. This is a reification of something they feel in their relationship and they are acting it out on their son. I don't think it's good that this is content. It should not be.
November 30, 2025 at 4:07 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
The podcast's tagline is, "Family therapy through politics." Frankly, I think it's some sort of sick debasement ritual to stick this out. They can call the parents stupid, but who are the stupid ones, the morally nihilistic authoritarians or the ones expecting them to change? Let's get real.
On “The Necessary Conversation” podcast, Chad’s Trump supporter parents tell him the military should follow Trump’s illegal orders and kill everyone in LA if Trump commanded it — even with him and his sister in the city😳
November 30, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
Trump supporters have made it unfashionable to be distrustful of the media. Whenever you call out the media for being wishy washy, biased, or dangerous, a handful of liberals will automically compare you to Trumpies who think anyone who is even remotely critical of Trump is fake news.

Hate it here.
When Howard Dean was the Democratic frontrunner for President, he was disqualified, by the media, for yelling "Yeah!" once.

At some point we just have to admit that mainstream media sources are biased.
Remember in 2000 when Al Gore was repeatedly misquoted as having said he invented the internet and that was seen the eyes of many as disqualifying him from office? Simpler times. Today, Trump makes up lies equivalent to "I invented the internet" 30 times a week and no one bats an eye. Good job media
November 30, 2025 at 5:40 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
‘But he owns the libs and makes me feel proud to be racist.’
Of course, his cult will only believe what the failed businessman who was saved from obscurity by reality tv says.
November 30, 2025 at 7:44 AM
Drop some CARTOONS ✍🏼 🖤 🎨
November 30, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
I don't want a "cancelled performer" - aka someone facing consequences for the actions that directly harmed others - to "reenter the culture".

No one person is talented enough to justify telling THOUSANDS of other equally talented people they must either leave or be potential abuse targets.
When a cancelled performer reënters the culture, we expect them to offer us a great work, channelling their newfound clarity into the finest art they’ve ever made. With his new comedy show and début novel, has Louis C.K. met the bar?
www.newyorker.com/culture/crit...
Louis C.K.’s Next Chapter
In a new standup special, and a début novel, the comedian navigates murky, post-#MeToo terrain: not quite exiled, not quite welcomed back.
www.newyorker.com
November 30, 2025 at 7:55 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
I'm flummoxed by the underground movement to rehab cancelled figures. There's a rumor that a studio head is planning to begin bringing cancelled people back. It's bananas. The industry has contracted, leaving writers, directors and actors scrambling for work and we're making space for sex criminals?
November 29, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
YouTube is getting destroyed by Twitter (X) Community Notes 😂
November 30, 2025 at 4:29 AM
The one that immediately springs to mind is The Mitchells vs. the Machines, I'm an animation fan largely burnt out on so many of the popular humour styles, and not only is it one of the funniest animated movies in recent years, it's better on repeat!
What is a movie that you love that would surprise most people who know you?
November 30, 2025 at 7:45 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
It's been 30 years. People just need to accept that Mariah Carey's All I Want For Christmas Is You is a stone cold Christmas classic and stop acting like it's some yearly assault on the purity of Christmas music playlists.
November 30, 2025 at 7:12 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
This is the most embarrassing thing I've read today. "Has been sending millennial cinephiles into critical paroxysms" followed by “mumblecore Shakespeare for the TikTok generation.” Generational mad-libs.
In @nytopinion.nytimes.com

The new film “Hamnet” offers up a vision of William Shakespeare as “Marlon Brando in Elizabethan drag,” writes Drew Lichtenberg. While this character may appeal to some, it “played to me like mumblecore Shakespeare, conceived for the TikTok generation.”
Opinion | ‘Hamnet’ Reimagines Shakespeare for the TikTok Generation
Our love of his plays have led to a centuries-long fascination with the writer. So why does each new fictional iteration get his life so wrong?
nyti.ms
November 30, 2025 at 5:37 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
Remember in 2000 when Al Gore was repeatedly misquoted as having said he invented the internet and that was seen the eyes of many as disqualifying him from office? Simpler times. Today, Trump makes up lies equivalent to "I invented the internet" 30 times a week and no one bats an eye. Good job media
November 30, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
They're ultimately embarrassed that liberal democracies are so much further ahead on LGBTQ rights than based communist dictatorships.
November 30, 2025 at 5:55 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
Today has been a great reminder that we still don't have a crystal clear societal definition of "cancellation" and many well-intentioned people are happy to argue about it.

My final statement on today: I just wish my industry were safer for everybody & that harmful people could be kept away from it
November 30, 2025 at 6:05 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
if elon musk had a butler he wouldn't be spending all day online posting about trying to get grok to make a girlfriend for him, he'd be laying on the ground with jarvis spooning him, cradling his head gently
November 29, 2025 at 6:54 AM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
rich dudes got freakier after butlers fell out of fashion, like say what you will about having domestic servants but clearly it was some sort of moderating force on old rich dudes having a fancy man follow you around saying shit like "oh dear sir, that wouldn't be very becoming"
November 29, 2025 at 6:43 AM
Pan's Labyrinth
November 29, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Sunshine (2007)
November 29, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Post Your Favorite 'Transformers' Character. Wrong Answers Only.
November 29, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Post your favorite "Lord of the Rings" character. Wrong answers only.
November 29, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Space Jam, an enjoyable bit of 90s schlock, even if some of the dialogue and gags from the first two thirds feel like placeholders that were never improved on.
November 29, 2025 at 4:21 PM
Reposted by Ryan Robotham
A study by Dayforce shows 87% of executives use AI for work, compared to 57% of managers and just 27% of employees.

I think this explains the massive disconnect we see in how CEOs talk about AI versus everyone else. It also raises the question of how useful it truly is for frontline work?
Execs are embracing AI more than their employees are, new research suggests
Research from HR software company Dayforce suggests that executives are leaning into AI far more than their employees.
www.businessinsider.com
November 28, 2025 at 10:58 AM