Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 6h

Interesting who he chooses to engage with vs ignore lol

6

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 6h

guess we figured out what sean's limit was @bradduplessis.bsky.social

1 15

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 6h

lmfao

infantrydork saying he deleted a post because he "descended into smearing" .

achewood "hey guys! Guess who just got...~yelled at~" comic .

2 1 48

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 6h

NDAA doesn't appropriate funds

The $8B is the tell, they're trying to pull a fast one using the reprogramming authority in the FY25 CR (since that's the limit), but that isn't how reprogramming works

1 4

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 6h

but you can only reprogram money if the reprogrammed money will be obligated in a manner that Congress has appropriated funds for; there is no FY26 MILPERS appropriations and FY25 MILPERS is expired

any FMer who participates in this is either too dumb to have their job or knowingly breaking the law

4 2 42

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 6h

RDT&E is what's known as two year money, as Congress appropriates it alowing for two fiscal years for it to be obligated

so yes there is almost certainly $8B in RDT&E from FY25 appropriations that can still legally be obligated in FY26

Task & Purpose @taskandpurpose.com · 12h

Pentagon moves $8 billion from research to pay troops trib.al/G0HMywT

Pentagon moves $8 billion from research to pay troops

Left over R&D funds will be used to pay military members on Oct. 15, the Department of Defense said, following orders from President Trump.

trib.al

1 30

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 10h

I'm skeptical of anything changing because the border wall MILCON boondoggles didn't move the needle, but there is a small chance this clownery results in them stripping any reprogramming authority in the future, which would both be bad and very funny

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 10h

yeah as a practical matter this is not at all the purpose of reprogramming and the PSMs on approps are gonna lose their minds, but also this is still black and white illegal

3 2 49

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 10h

yeah as a practical matter this is not at all the purpose of reprogramming and the PSMs on approps are gonna lose their minds, but also this is still black and white illegal

1 13

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 10h

when reading an appropriations bill, your prior should be "which interpretation would give more power to the Congress," because that interpretation is the correct one

1 4 61

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 10h

Who knows what the committees will actually do, since they're all run by wet noodles now, but the PSMs will not be pleased by this latest chicanery

at a minimum gonna make life a lot more difficult for everyone with Hill engagements

2 2 43

Mike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 10h

Correct

Reprogramming is intended (and the language is written) to give the Executive latitude to not be overly strictured because when we're talking about almost a trillion dollars a few billion might not be 100% aligned

But it is ALWAYS done in consultation with approps, particularly their PSMs

Matt Separa @mattsepara.bsky.social · 11h

I don't think people really understand the idea that Congress controls the purse strings and how important it is to the Constitutional order. It literally prevents the executive from doing anything without Congress providing the money. This is a power Congress has VERY closely guarded.

2 18 95