Mike Black
mikeblack114.bsky.social
Mike Black
@mikeblack114.bsky.social
Are you shittin me?!?!! No, but you'll print that and I'll probably be investigated

Posts mine, but if you see something you think you can use to get me in trouble I did it on my own time and my own device, so good luck
it is taking everything I have to not do a post mocking the average reply/quote re: OP because while it would be incredibly easy it would be mean and counterproductive
November 21, 2025 at 2:56 AM
When the ICBM mission was part of AF Space Command after SAC and before Global Strike came into being, that lack of surety focus is why things went to hell in that leg of the triad (the bombers being under a fighter command is the other part, hence why Global Strike Command exists now)
November 21, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Not exactly, they took the space mission (not really rockets because they 100% contract out the lift part of the mission) and binned it into USSF (mostly), but the thing about ICBMs is the most important part of the mission is nuclear surety
November 21, 2025 at 12:18 AM
They are making a space littoral commander
November 21, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Absolutelu true that most of the rest of the AF doesn't know how to spell surety, but GSC (and its air staff minions in A10) definitely do
November 21, 2025 at 12:14 AM
The problem is the most important thing with the ICBM mission is surety, and there's only two services who have a focus on that; when they were under AFSPC pre-09 that lack of surety focus is why things went to hell

At least with GSC they've got a 4 star billet and a home in a surety focused MAJCOM
November 21, 2025 at 12:12 AM
420% to buy 69% of all production with an increase to 1488% if they renege again.
November 20, 2025 at 11:49 PM
420% imo
November 20, 2025 at 11:45 PM
oh my god
November 20, 2025 at 6:10 PM
ALCON: This is the SECAR mandated daily checkin. Ack receipt within 2 hours

rgr
rgr
rgr
rgr
fuck u
rgr
rgr
November 20, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Yeah my eyes did the cartoon bugging out of my head bit when I got to that sentence, just casually mentioned in the middle of the piece lol
November 20, 2025 at 5:58 PM
He and his supporters explicitly made the argument that he acted out of a sense of loyalty to the state of Israel as an American Jew and thus should receive leniency

Which, nevermind that he was actually selling secrets for money, the argument is obviously reprehensible in itself
November 20, 2025 at 5:56 PM
In terms of severity it was arguably the worst burning of US/NSA technical collection capabilities in history, until Snowden
November 20, 2025 at 5:38 PM
Outright spied, attempted to sell a ton of secrets to the highest bidder, then when caught tried to claim he was actually doing it out of patriotism, with a side of claiming the Jewish dual-loyalty trope was good and what he was doing
November 20, 2025 at 5:38 PM
And House Dems aren't playing/taking it deadly seriously (as they should), already explicitly going to the SAA and USCP to up security
November 20, 2025 at 5:27 PM
I think the only other guys you'd get this for are Ames, Hanssen, and maybe Ed
November 20, 2025 at 5:12 PM
This isn't even one scaramucci is it
November 20, 2025 at 4:58 PM
1,550 deployed warheads is the New START treaty limitation, but because of weird treaty math that counts a bomber as one warhead (despite it carrying more operationally) the actual number is commonly referred to as 1,770, which is an estimate

So you can totally imagine we have 1776 deployed lol
November 20, 2025 at 4:56 PM