Michael Paulauski♨️
@mike10010100.com
I lose brain cells so you don't have to. Devops Galore. DemSoc liking anarchism. Antifascist. BLM/Abolish the Police. Views are mine, not employer’s. He/him
Pinned
Michael Paulauski♨️
@mike10010100.com
· Sep 20
go to moderation settings, Bluesky official moderation service, scroll down to “rude,” turn it off
Brigaders mass reported my account and Bluesky labeled it.
Spread the word and let people know how to turn it off.
bsky.app/profile/elea...
Spread the word and let people know how to turn it off.
bsky.app/profile/elea...
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
My message remains the same a year later.
We don’t have kings in America, and I won’t bend the knee to one.
We don’t have kings in America, and I won’t bend the knee to one.
February 16, 2026 at 12:58 AM
My message remains the same a year later.
We don’t have kings in America, and I won’t bend the knee to one.
We don’t have kings in America, and I won’t bend the knee to one.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I am Graham Platner's age. I too was in the post 9/11 military. I also grew up in a small town in the Northeast US. I am also a college dropout with PTSD. And I am telling you: anyone from my demographic who had a Nazi tattoo for 15 years is either a Nazi or too dumb to be an effective US senator.
February 15, 2026 at 9:04 PM
I am Graham Platner's age. I too was in the post 9/11 military. I also grew up in a small town in the Northeast US. I am also a college dropout with PTSD. And I am telling you: anyone from my demographic who had a Nazi tattoo for 15 years is either a Nazi or too dumb to be an effective US senator.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
It was so damn frustrating trying, and mostly failing, to explain this to a couple of very earnest and very not-online Boomer academic liberals. To they extent we made progress they were inclined to cut Platner slack and blame it on the military-industrial complex for breaking him
I am Graham Platner's age. I too was in the post 9/11 military. I also grew up in a small town in the Northeast US. I am also a college dropout with PTSD. And I am telling you: anyone from my demographic who had a Nazi tattoo for 15 years is either a Nazi or too dumb to be an effective US senator.
February 16, 2026 at 12:22 AM
It was so damn frustrating trying, and mostly failing, to explain this to a couple of very earnest and very not-online Boomer academic liberals. To they extent we made progress they were inclined to cut Platner slack and blame it on the military-industrial complex for breaking him
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Let’s all remember goofy as shit TOS and TNG episodes
I’ll start with Catspaw
I’ll start with Catspaw
The really silly TOS and TNG episodes? The characters *realized* they were in dumb episodes and acknowledged the stupidity before solving it.
"I am Apollo!"
"...And I'm the Tsar of all the Russias"
"I am Apollo!"
"...And I'm the Tsar of all the Russias"
February 16, 2026 at 2:03 AM
Let’s all remember goofy as shit TOS and TNG episodes
I’ll start with Catspaw
I’ll start with Catspaw
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
“I would like to represent this district, which I initially paid a lot of money to avoid when moving here” ok sure
February 16, 2026 at 12:32 AM
“I would like to represent this district, which I initially paid a lot of money to avoid when moving here” ok sure
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I mean one answer was to live in the district at any point for any amount of time before filing your paperwork
February 16, 2026 at 12:32 AM
I mean one answer was to live in the district at any point for any amount of time before filing your paperwork
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
This is, to be clear, not an insult to Kat, but:
She's young, blonde, conventionally very attractive, and says all the things Berniebros/leftists want to hear.
That in and of itself is more than enough to make her a "beloved national figure" in their minds until they tire of her.
She's young, blonde, conventionally very attractive, and says all the things Berniebros/leftists want to hear.
That in and of itself is more than enough to make her a "beloved national figure" in their minds until they tire of her.
February 16, 2026 at 12:15 AM
This is, to be clear, not an insult to Kat, but:
She's young, blonde, conventionally very attractive, and says all the things Berniebros/leftists want to hear.
That in and of itself is more than enough to make her a "beloved national figure" in their minds until they tire of her.
She's young, blonde, conventionally very attractive, and says all the things Berniebros/leftists want to hear.
That in and of itself is more than enough to make her a "beloved national figure" in their minds until they tire of her.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Biss is from a family of Israeli Jews so I’m sure everyone will be very normal about it
February 16, 2026 at 12:16 AM
Biss is from a family of Israeli Jews so I’m sure everyone will be very normal about it
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
She’s polling very well everywhere except the IL-9 lol
February 16, 2026 at 12:13 AM
She’s polling very well everywhere except the IL-9 lol
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
“Getting clowned on for living in a $4000 a month luxury building in Streeterville is a lot like being a refugee, when you think about it”
Alright, I don’t actually think being a carpetbagger is that big of a deal but it is unbelievably gross to compare criticism of carpetbagging to attacks on undocumented immigrants
“She’s not from here.”
February 16, 2026 at 12:13 AM
“Getting clowned on for living in a $4000 a month luxury building in Streeterville is a lot like being a refugee, when you think about it”
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Except for the fact that people like Kat and her ilk are constantly referring to Jews, Israelis in particular, as white and “white colonizers”. And someone as white passing as she is has zero fucking businesses invoking brown immigrants.
February 16, 2026 at 3:32 AM
Except for the fact that people like Kat and her ilk are constantly referring to Jews, Israelis in particular, as white and “white colonizers”. And someone as white passing as she is has zero fucking businesses invoking brown immigrants.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
if only one could do something after getting it wrong the first time. is this possible. are LLM devs considering this?
February 16, 2026 at 12:21 AM
if only one could do something after getting it wrong the first time. is this possible. are LLM devs considering this?
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I love whatever fake math this is
This is also why agentic LLMs will never live up the hype. Error rates (ie hallucinations, bc those are errors) multiply.
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
February 16, 2026 at 12:12 AM
I love whatever fake math this is
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Remains to be seen whether humans can invent any kind of countermeasure to dealing with actors in the workplace that make a mistake from time to time.
This is also why agentic LLMs will never live up the hype. Error rates (ie hallucinations, bc those are errors) multiply.
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
February 16, 2026 at 1:27 AM
Remains to be seen whether humans can invent any kind of countermeasure to dealing with actors in the workplace that make a mistake from time to time.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
until LLMs all code was flawless and shipped only when passing all tests
This is also why agentic LLMs will never live up the hype. Error rates (ie hallucinations, bc those are errors) multiply.
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
February 16, 2026 at 2:48 AM
until LLMs all code was flawless and shipped only when passing all tests
That's...not how that math actually works. You don't have an identical chance of getting the same things wrong on subsequent verification runs, not to mention how variations in system prompts can set the initial conditions of models in a completely separate area of conceptual space.
This is also why agentic LLMs will never live up the hype. Error rates (ie hallucinations, bc those are errors) multiply.
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
February 16, 2026 at 3:35 AM
That's...not how that math actually works. You don't have an identical chance of getting the same things wrong on subsequent verification runs, not to mention how variations in system prompts can set the initial conditions of models in a completely separate area of conceptual space.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
This not how things work. A system that is 80% accurate, run multiple times, can achieve 100% accuracy on tasks for which valid test criteria exist. So then for a multi step task with valid test criteria each step is gated on passing tests, and the error does not compound.
This is also why agentic LLMs will never live up the hype. Error rates (ie hallucinations, bc those are errors) multiply.
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
Ex: if you chain two LLMs that individually have 80% success rates, the total success rate is 64%!
Chained 4 times? 41%
😳🫠🤷🏽♂️
February 16, 2026 at 2:53 AM
This not how things work. A system that is 80% accurate, run multiple times, can achieve 100% accuracy on tasks for which valid test criteria exist. So then for a multi step task with valid test criteria each step is gated on passing tests, and the error does not compound.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Sometimes you get a real wild one in the mentions and it’s bizarre to see who they have mutuals with
February 16, 2026 at 3:12 AM
Sometimes you get a real wild one in the mentions and it’s bizarre to see who they have mutuals with
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I’m sorry but somehow it’s the middle of Trump’s term and we’re already doing the thing where we forget how bad Trump is???
Counterpoint: if the Prince of Darkness rises from a fiery portal at the Iowa Caucus and declares his opposition to Donald Trump, I will ride to battle with the host of Hell
February 16, 2026 at 3:00 AM
I’m sorry but somehow it’s the middle of Trump’s term and we’re already doing the thing where we forget how bad Trump is???
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
people are complicated and stupid.
so, if I’m understanding this correctly, the 4chan weirdos behind gamergate were sexist freaks but at the same time, one of the main targets of their harassment is… also a racist freak?
February 16, 2026 at 3:12 AM
people are complicated and stupid.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I remain perplexed by high engagement, low information voters
You know how the House Democrats are _that_ close to requiring ICE to follow the CONSTITUTION in getting judicial warrants for entering homes, but it's controversial? Let's both hope that Biss discovers a previously-unknown appetite for defying those holding his leash on that vote!
February 16, 2026 at 3:11 AM
I remain perplexed by high engagement, low information voters
The engagement is fandom. Simple as.
I remain perplexed by high engagement, low information voters
You know how the House Democrats are _that_ close to requiring ICE to follow the CONSTITUTION in getting judicial warrants for entering homes, but it's controversial? Let's both hope that Biss discovers a previously-unknown appetite for defying those holding his leash on that vote!
February 16, 2026 at 3:31 AM
The engagement is fandom. Simple as.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
they're not actually high engagement *with the politics*, they're high engagement with very limited and highly stupid online social circles.
I remain perplexed by high engagement, low information voters
You know how the House Democrats are _that_ close to requiring ICE to follow the CONSTITUTION in getting judicial warrants for entering homes, but it's controversial? Let's both hope that Biss discovers a previously-unknown appetite for defying those holding his leash on that vote!
February 16, 2026 at 3:13 AM
they're not actually high engagement *with the politics*, they're high engagement with very limited and highly stupid online social circles.
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
"bluesky is for the trannies" until someone who is trans works at the company and you take out whatever anger of the day that isn't in their control on that tranny to make a statement.
February 16, 2026 at 3:29 AM
"bluesky is for the trannies" until someone who is trans works at the company and you take out whatever anger of the day that isn't in their control on that tranny to make a statement.