Michael Paulauski♨️
banner
mike10010100.com
Michael Paulauski♨️
@mike10010100.com
I lose brain cells so you don't have to. Devops Galore. DemSoc liking anarchism. Antifascist. BLM/Abolish the Police. Views are mine, not employer’s. He/him
Pinned
Brigaders mass reported my account and Bluesky labeled it.

Spread the word and let people know how to turn it off.

bsky.app/profile/elea...
go to moderation settings, Bluesky official moderation service, scroll down to “rude,” turn it off
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Oh boy, did Hasan just fly into an anti-Democrat rage after being criticized by two trans people? You'd think he'd be more mature than this, but...
February 12, 2026 at 8:02 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I kinda wonder, given everything else we know about Hasan, if his "shoot you in the head" comment is projection on his part.
Oh boy, did Hasan just fly into an anti-Democrat rage after being criticized by two trans people? You'd think he'd be more mature than this, but...
February 12, 2026 at 8:04 PM
Lordy!
FYI "Track Aipac" is a Ron Paul / John McCain supporter who works in the oil industry and whose husband is a military contractor.

Birds of a feather etc.
February 12, 2026 at 8:05 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Plus they have a very bad track record at what they say they do (on top of the you know bad implications of this whole project)
FYI "Track Aipac" is a Ron Paul / John McCain supporter who works in the oil industry and whose husband is a military contractor.

Birds of a feather etc.
February 12, 2026 at 7:31 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
FYI "Track Aipac" is a Ron Paul / John McCain supporter who works in the oil industry and whose husband is a military contractor.

Birds of a feather etc.
February 12, 2026 at 7:27 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
FYI "Track Aipac" is a Ron Paul / John McCain supporter who works in the oil industry and whose husband is a military contractor.

Birds of a feather etc.
February 12, 2026 at 7:29 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Rooting for Abughazaleh to lose at this point because I think its important for the health of our politics that poorly run wrecker campaigns actually see consequences for their shitty behavior rather than be rewarded with a nomination.
Man that is a disgusting smear, you’re a campaign spokesperson? AIPAC doesn’t like Biss or Abughazaleh! loyolaphoenix.com/2025/10/pro-...
February 12, 2026 at 6:19 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Yes, this. Also too: Platner.
Rooting for Abughazaleh to lose at this point because I think its important for the health of our politics that poorly run wrecker campaigns actually see consequences for their shitty behavior rather than be rewarded with a nomination.
Man that is a disgusting smear, you’re a campaign spokesperson? AIPAC doesn’t like Biss or Abughazaleh! loyolaphoenix.com/2025/10/pro-...
February 12, 2026 at 7:29 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Oh man he’s part of Kats campaign! Oh no that’s not good at alllll
February 12, 2026 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
the AIPAC candidate is very openly Fine, and neither Duckworth nor Biss get AIPAC money, it’s hard to read this as something other than “the Jew money bought her off for the Jew”
Post has been deleted:
February 12, 2026 at 7:32 PM
Oh look, the edgelords running Kat Abu's campaign are edging again.
Post has been deleted:
February 12, 2026 at 7:18 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Abughazaleh's campaign spox's reaction to Duckworth's endorsement:
February 12, 2026 at 5:37 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Post has been deleted:
February 12, 2026 at 7:03 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
I don't think triple-parenthesis posting is going to go over well in that district.
Post has been deleted:
February 12, 2026 at 7:13 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
A downside that no one cares to talk about when they're cheering on some new political sensation who "isn't part of the system" is that this person likely has no fucking clue who to hire due to inexperience. Obama made a *lot* of rookie staffing mistakes that ended up costing him at various points.
It's amazing that the biggest cloud over Obama's Presidency are the hiring decisions save the Vice Presidency.
this is a fascinating piece because it shows what Ruemmler - clearly the source here, probably through an intermediary - thinks is exculpatory and it's real Chinese official 'well I *have* to go to the brothel for work' stuff. which is to say, both true, corrupt, and revealing.
February 12, 2026 at 7:15 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
my belief that bigotry is frequently multigenerational, survives repression, and generally overpowers material interests is at the root of my views on nearly every issue. I do not believe *merely* empowering the weak will bring justice.
February 12, 2026 at 6:49 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
"do you believe bigotry and prejudice exist in people who do not currently have power to enforce their preferences, &that people without meaningful social power can prioritize strongly-held bigotries and other moral beliefs over material benefit" is a big dividing line in how one thinks the world is
February 12, 2026 at 6:47 PM
As always with Tankies and the far-right, what they claim against their enemies is *always* projection.

If they have people arguing about how the Nazis copied the US, nobody can notice how the Nazis copied the USSR.
it also ignores the study that the SS put into the soviet gulag system [e.g. during the Gestapo-NKVD conferences] and how that (i.e. forced labor by political undesirables) was [part of] their original model for the camp system before the final solution in '42
I have no idea where “the nazis learned everything they knew about bigotry from Americans” came from but it is a particularly delusional form of American exceptionalism
February 12, 2026 at 7:11 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
this kind of "always treating women with respect" that men like Fetterman do is infantilization. it's assuming a woman can't be horrible and deserve opprobium, and women like Noem absolutely prey upon it, and it's an insult to all women
Fetterman: "I met with Secretary Noem. I've always treated her with respect. I refuse and never will engage in the kinds of sexist terms like 'ICE Barbie' that the left media will use."
February 12, 2026 at 6:56 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
it also ignores the study that the SS put into the soviet gulag system [e.g. during the Gestapo-NKVD conferences] and how that (i.e. forced labor by political undesirables) was [part of] their original model for the camp system before the final solution in '42
I have no idea where “the nazis learned everything they knew about bigotry from Americans” came from but it is a particularly delusional form of American exceptionalism
February 12, 2026 at 6:57 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
2024 represented a natural experiment in a lot of ways*, like do you have to have a good campaign to win (no), do you have to cover up your malice with euphemisms (no), does being a convicted felon affect the vote (no).

*probably only applicable to republicans, maybe only to Trump specifically
February 12, 2026 at 5:47 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
yeah this is really good actually. damn
February 12, 2026 at 6:43 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
where have I heard this one before
February 12, 2026 at 6:43 PM
Reposted by Michael Paulauski♨️
Mike Johnson chides DOJ for tracking lawmakers’ perusal of unredacted Epstein files
Mike Johnson chides DOJ for tracking lawmakers’ perusal of unredacted Epstein files
Separately, the top House Democrat says there will be “accountability” for the agency’s surveillance of members. Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday he disapproves of the Justice Department surveilling lawmakers who come to agency headquarters to review the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files. “I don’t think it’s appropriate for anybody to be tracking that,” Johnson told reporters. “So I will echo that to anybody involved with DOJ, and I’m sure it was an oversight. That’s my guess.” This week, members of Congress have been invited to a DOJ office building to read materials related to the federal case against Epstein that have not been scrubbed for public consumption. “Members should obviously have the right to peruse those at their own speed and with their own discretion,” Johnson said. But revelations came to light Wednesday, when Attorney General Pam Bondi was testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, that the department might be keeping tabs on which documents lawmakers are viewing on official computers. During Bondi’s appearance on Capitol Hill, a photo was taken of her research binder that revealed a print-out page of the “Search History” for Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.). “It is an outrage that DOJ is tracking Members’ investigative steps undertaken to ensure that DOJ is complying with the Epstein File Transparency Act and using this information for the Attorney General’s embarrassing polemical purposes,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, in a statement. Jayapal said in an interview with NPR that she had also raised her concerns with Johnson. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, at his weekly news conference Thursday, said he would follow up to ensure Johnson is pressing the matter with the DOJ directly and “make clear to him that his job is to defend this institution.” Jeffries continued, “it does violate the principles of separate and co-equal branches of government. And of course, my Republican colleagues should be denouncing it, but they will not, because they simply are reckless rubber stamps for Donald Trump’s extreme behavior.” Asked whether Democrats would seek reprisal for the DOJ tracking, Jeffries said “accountability can either happen right now” or “in the aftermath of the November midterm elections,” when the New Yorker is bullish that his party will retake control of the House. A Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately return a request for comment about the motivation behind monitoring lawmakers’ searches or plans to stop the practice.
dlvr.it
February 12, 2026 at 6:48 PM