Doctor Charlton Cussans PhD
@charltoncussans.bsky.social
1.6K followers 1.1K following 12K posts
PhD in History, fiction published by Sea Lion Press and original non-fiction research published by Historical Research. Lecturer in History and Politics at a Nid-Tier University.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
charltoncussans.bsky.social
Royal Air Force Group Captain Adolph Gysbert Malan, DSO & Bar, DFC & Bar, "Sailor Malan", South African war hero and Anti-Apartheid organiser and politician.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
Yes.

I can only stand to be insulted so many times for repeating basic historical facts.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
Man I love this photo.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
Gives me a chance to bring up my favourite photo from WW2:
Vincent Bunting left and Adolph Malan right both RAF one Jamaican the other an Afrikaner.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
The Chief Native Commissioner of Southern Rhodesia advocated 'removing' the entire black population in the 30s.

So yes.
andrewtheblueskier.bsky.social
Do you *still* learn new facts about Rhodesia that make you go "man fuck these guys" to a level you didn't expect?
charltoncussans.bsky.social
So much of the stuff in the Constitution was either new or hadn't been done on the scale it had been done before.

Also, even the best Constitution can't survive if too many people don't care about it. Anti-constitutional forces are in charge of the Government, and they got there via elections.
debnicktom.bsky.social
A reminder that the beloved American Constitution is absolute shite or this wouldn't be possible. Ditto the revered 'Founding Fathers' who wrote such a flawed and dangerous document, just hopeless twats.
peggystuart.bsky.social
Reminder that this baseless indictment of New York Attorney General Letitia James is part of Donald Trump’s corrupt weaponization of the criminal justice system against anyone who has sought to hold him accountable.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
Christians do not get a monopoly on perspectives on Christianity.

Now, admittedly, this means Jews and Muslims don't get one on Judaism and Islam either. But on this site, Christians being weird is normal, so...
charltoncussans.bsky.social
Nothing makes the Christian perspective inherently more (or less tbh) truthful than the Jewish one. And the Muslim one too, for that matter, Islam has opinions on Jesus of Nazareth.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
Oh, Parliamentary Privilege is a feature of both Houses, and of the US Congress as well.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
For the record, a world without nuclear weapons is a desirable goal.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
I mean, neither am I tbh. I need to go to bed ffs.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
Yeah, it was considered normal, and actual historians have to engage with that. We rightfully don't consider them normal today, but 80 years ago they were, as was a whole bunch of heinous shit. This all started because you clearly didn't and don't understand the nature of WW2.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
I can name plenty of countries that have destroyed cities since.

You seem to not understand that everyone was destroying cities in WW2, it was understood as a normal way of waging war.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
I can name plenty of countries that have annihilated cities, which is what the bombs did.

America used the bomb because they had it, and because it wasn't considered different from the rest of military practice at the time.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
"My issue with your language is the way it manufactures consent for further use of excessive force upon opposing populations." Doesn't have much to do with WW2.

Saying something was acceptable in one time and place does not mean I think it's acceptable in others.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
I mean to be blunt if they're not used in 1945, they're probably used in Korea en masse in 1950, and that's so much worse.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
My point is there is nothing particularly American about the atomic bomb.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
I am reading what you're saying. I *disagree* with you.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
No? The necessity debate has everything to do with the particular circumstances of WW2. Which is why Truman didn't use it in Korea, and rightfully so.

The British have had nukes since the 50s and never used them, even when our territory was invaded, again, rightfully so.
charltoncussans.bsky.social
You do understand that *every* combatant would have used the nuke if they got it, right?
charltoncussans.bsky.social
I mean, I'm not. I'm talking about WW2.