sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
banner
2damntrans.bsky.social
sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
@2damntrans.bsky.social
cymraes. transexual. transfeminist. libertarian socialism/anarchism. abertawe. she/her. 🌹🏴🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇵🇸
Pinned
OK, it's done. After at least half a decade, big tiddy Philip Femme Fry is no longer my avi. The end of an era, but after all that time I can't part with her completely so I've moved her to my header image. #NewProfilePic. You can see all of my face in this one.
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
Is this cheese grater conscious? Many users feel they're talking to a real person. Scientists say it's time to consider whether they're onto something.
November 25, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
but all the characters are Muppets
Nestor Makhno biopic written and directed by Alfonso Cuarón.
If you were a despotic president, what movie would you force Hollywood to make? I want to see Quentin's Star Trek movie or maybe Kill Bill Vol 3.
November 25, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Nestor Makhno biopic written and directed by Alfonso Cuarón.
If you were a despotic president, what movie would you force Hollywood to make? I want to see Quentin's Star Trek movie or maybe Kill Bill Vol 3.
November 25, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
Also knives out but the suspects are the Muppets
Knives Out: A Star Wars Story
If you were a despotic president, what movie would you force Hollywood to make? I want to see Quentin's Star Trek movie or maybe Kill Bill Vol 3.
November 25, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
Knives Out: A Star Wars Story
If you were a despotic president, what movie would you force Hollywood to make? I want to see Quentin's Star Trek movie or maybe Kill Bill Vol 3.
November 25, 2025 at 6:48 PM
the british establishment is very closely-knit so a shift in opinion in journalism heralds a shift in opinion in the judiciary, in politics etc.
Like it was obvious when the Supreme Court randomly decided to rewrite the Equality Act, but I think there's a large amount if journalistic negligence that no one really treats judges as anything other than neutral conduits through which the word of law moves
November 25, 2025 at 6:49 PM
thinking about getting a side cut, why not.
November 25, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
Like it was obvious when the Supreme Court randomly decided to rewrite the Equality Act, but I think there's a large amount if journalistic negligence that no one really treats judges as anything other than neutral conduits through which the word of law moves
November 25, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
I think we are long past the point of noting the judiciary is ideologically captured by bigots and extremists
It is genuinely insane to see a judge describe Graham Linehan as a “generally credible witness” in a trial where he claimed Sophia Brooks has been engaged in “trans activism” since 2013 (when she would’ve been 6 years old), then, when challenged, claimed her drivers license lied about her age.
November 25, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
this includes "male bodied" "male sexed" "male socialized" and maybe my hottest take "male to female"
calling trans women "male", no matter how much confused, so-called "biology' you try to back it up with, is transphobic and functions to erase the reality of our being. it is a key pillar of trans-eliminationist "gender-critical" ideology and the BBC has clearly been captured by this ideology.
November 25, 2025 at 5:59 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
The consequentialist argument "I will sacrifice justice for the greater good" only formally works if said sacrifice is actually necessary and sufficient for the greater good / lesser evil. You don't get to be triumphal about being an amoral cretin if you also lose and bring about the greater evil.
October 24, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
And the history of these categories bears this out. Supposedly biological categories of "male" and "female" (categories which we are supposed to pretend exist in some "objective" sense, an absurdity) of "male" and "female" do not and cannot exist independently of gender.
November 25, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
I don't agree. Sex is just an extension of gender.
November 25, 2025 at 5:47 PM
calling trans women "male", no matter how much confused, so-called "biology' you try to back it up with, is transphobic and functions to erase the reality of our being. it is a key pillar of trans-eliminationist "gender-critical" ideology and the BBC has clearly been captured by this ideology.
November 25, 2025 at 5:08 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
The value of reading history is you know that in 1860 there were abolitionists who were so demoralized that they thought chattel slavery would be permanent. 5 years later those still alive had lived to see its end.
November 12, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
Eager to support our work and get involved in trans liberation yourself?
Send us an email at [email protected]
November 16, 2025 at 1:24 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
It might sound counterintuitive but trying to take Farage, Trump, Le Pen down based on individual flaws without centring the damage their politics do is counterproductive

It opens the way for less extreme actors espousing the same politics while these have become normalised by mainstream actors
November 25, 2025 at 8:51 AM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
It's grim isn't it. "Trans woman" is fewer words and perfectly clear, but it seems to be editorial policy to go out of their way to imply she's making it up.
November 25, 2025 at 12:36 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
I don’t know enough about the situation with Lineham to opine on whether the judgement is valid or not, but everything about this paragraph in the BBC article makes me despair at how many institutions have been captured by the GC movement

www.bbc.com/news/article...
November 25, 2025 at 12:29 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
U.K. court un-divorces linehan in recent ruling
November 25, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
And these things are not equal—institutional neutrality should not under any circumstances include ‘neutrality’ on racism, genocide, anti-migrant hate, and anti-trans bigotry; and yet, even under the impossible ‘view from nowhere’ framework, the BBC is not remotely ‘neutral’ on any of these points
November 25, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
"line go up is more important than preventing children from being preyed upon" - billionaire Mark Zuckerberg
“Meta stalled internal efforts to prevent child predators from contacting minors for years due to growth concerns, and pressured safety staff to circulate arguments justifying its decision not to act.”

www.reuters.com/sustainabili...
November 23, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Reposted by sasha ↙︎↙︎↙︎ 🌹🏴
Innocent Smoothies vibes but for people who want to shit themselves.
Half are called "pickled yum-ions" and the other half "rectum destroyer"
November 21, 2025 at 11:27 PM