Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Matt Williams

@matthewmatix.bsky.social

1.7K followers 150 following 110 posts

Associate prof at Massey University. Interested in statistics, open science, meta-psychology, and conspiracy theories. https://mattwilliams.netlify.app/

Videos

Psychology 36%

Sociology 17%

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 13h

In psychology it's more like "anything with a vaguely right wing vibe"

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 13h

Agreed. Though while we're being pessimistic, one worry I have is that preprint servers are a very easy target for anyone trying to manipulate citation stats on existing papers.

Reposted by Linda J. Skitka, Matt N Williams

Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 14h

Results of the replication are in!

Chocolate is more desirable than poop:

Cohen's d_rm = 6.20, 95%CI [5.63, 6.78]

N = 486, two single item 1-7 Likert scales of desirability.

w/
@jamiecummins.bsky.social

Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 1d

Make an effect size prediction!

@jamiecummins.bsky.social and I are replicating Balcetis & Dunning's (2010) "chocolate is more desirable than poop" (Cohen's d = 4.52)

Let us known in the replies what effect size you think we'll find. Details of the study in the thread below.

2 10 36

Reposted by Matt N Williams

Stephen Nuñez @socio-steve.bsky.social · 16h

Neoliberalism has several sins but, "super high tariffs" and "nanny state scolding about nutritional value," are not among them.

4 11 220

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 1d

Nice! This lines up with work by @eddieclarke.bsky.social showing that the people who endorse the midpoint of the left-right item are far from homogeneous...

osf.io/preprints/ps...

OSF

osf.io

1 5

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 1d

d = 3.6

(Original estimate less a completely made-up factor for publication bias)

Reposted by Ian Hussey, Matt N Williams, Jill A. Jacobson , and 1 more Ian Hussey, Matt N Williams, Jill A. Jacobson, Matti Vuorre

PCI Psychology @psych.peercommunityin.org · 1d

PCI Psychology is open for submissions! Did you know that you can easily submit your recommended preprint to any of the 20+ PCI Psych friendly journals? See all friendly journals here: psych.peercommunityin.org/about/pci_fr...
#PsychSciSky #SciPub

13 11

Reposted by Matt N Williams

Nick Fox @nickfoxnz.bsky.social · 2d

Excited for my doctoral research to be published, thanks to the support of @matthewmatix.bsky.social @srhastraea.bsky.social

Do Stress, Depression, and Anxiety Lead to Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories? - Nick D. Fox, Matt N. Williams, Stephen R. Hill, 2025

Previous research has found positive correlations between manifestations of psychological distress, such as anxiety, depression, and stress, and belief in consp...

doi.org

1 4 10

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 5d

In which the authors of a 2023 Psych Science paper claim that the correlation between two constants is 1

3 10

Reposted by Mel Bartley, Jörg Peters, Philip N. Cohen , and 4 more Mel Bartley, Jörg Peters, Philip N. Cohen, Andrew K Przybylski, Magnus Johansson, Ingo Rohlfing, Matt N Williams

Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 10d

My article "Data is not available upon request" was published in Meta-Psychology. Very happy to see this out!
open.lnu.se/index.php/me...

LnuOpen | Meta-Psychology

open.lnu.se

5 44 110

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 12d

This is a fun study, and I agree the CLPM totally sucks. Still... the question of how severe a test it is relates to how it behaves when testing a *false* hypothesis. So the fact we don't know how many of those 98*2 causal effects exist in reality seems a little troublesome...

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 12d

So please send us your work!

(And yes, I know it's a bit weird that I'm located about as far from Europe as one can get without a spaceship)

Reposted by Mark Rubin

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 12d

I'm joining the brilliant @jkarl.bsky.social as co-EIC at Europe's Journal of Psychology. ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop

EJOP is a generalist psych journal, and applies a diamond open access model (no APC). I'd love to see more submissions with rigorous methods & well-calibrated conclusions!

Europe’s Journal of Psychology

Quarterly peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific psychology featuring original studies, research, critical contributions written by and intended for psychologists worldwide.

ejop.psychopen.eu

3 2 4

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 13d

PhD holder who didn't collect any original data for my thesis checking in 🙋 The world isn't short of data to analyse!

(I did collect data for my Masters... pen-and-paper surveys from primary school kids... back in the olden days!)

Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 14d

A lot of psych is already conducted with online convenience samples & ppl are probably excited about silicon samples bc it would allow them to crank out more studies for even less 💸

How about we reconsider the idea that sciencey science involves collecting own data.
www.science.org/content/arti...

AI-generated ‘participants’ can lead social science experiments astray, study finds

Data produced by “silicon samples” depends on researchers’ exact choice of models, prompts, and settings

www.science.org

Reposted by Joanna Bryson, Meredith Broussard, Ingo Rohlfing , and 9 more Joanna Bryson, Meredith Broussard, Ingo Rohlfing, Ian Hussey, Martin Kreidl, Brian Keegan, Matt N Williams, Jens Rommel, Dana R. Fisher, Johannes Breuer, Nathan P. Kalmoe, Dana Howard

Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 14d

AI-generated ‘participants’ can lead social science experiments astray, study finds

Data produced by “silicon samples” depends on researchers’ exact choice of models, prompts, and settings

www.science.org

13 71 230

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 15d

Have you considered getting them to use SPSS via a remote desktop connected to a university machine? Because I find that's always fun too

1 4

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 20d

No. Post-publication peer review is an essential and under-appreciated service to the scientific community, and not remotely criminal. I'm sure it's upsetting to have problems in your work identified, but the solution is to do better science.

2 9

Reposted by Matt N Williams

Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 21d

Some researchers don't discuss their future research plans for fear of being scooped.

Not me. I drop bad ideas for unscrupulous people to 'steal'.

- What are the neural correlates of Open Science practices?
- What is the role of habits in learning a new skill through repetitive practice?

a man in a leather jacket is looking up and saying `` big brain '' while standing in front of a building .

ALT: a man in a leather jacket is looking up and saying `` big brain '' while standing in front of a building .

media.tenor.com

4 14 57

Reposted by Sebastian Karcher, Matt N Williams, Joanna Tai , and 1 more Sebastian Karcher, Matt N Williams, Joanna Tai, Timothy D. McBride

Conrad Hackett @conradhackett.bsky.social · 22d

BEWARE: Surveys that allow anyone to "opt in" are vulnerable to those who create many accounts (using VPN to bypass IP limits) & use automated tools to generate bogus responses (such as saying "yes" to question about being licensed to operate nuclear submarines).
www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...

4 40 140

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 24d

In my experience PCI RR reviews are also pretty darn comprehensive and thorough! I guess YMMV though

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · 24d

Reviews from PCI would come from a specific thematic PCI. peercommunityin.org/current-pcis/ For those 3 journals the closest possible match is PCI RR (were they registered reports?), but that feels unlikely - only 1 of the 3 (Collabra) is a PCI RR friendly journal.

Current PCIs - Peer Community In

Here is the list of the different Peer Communities In already created, hosting recommendations and peer-reviews of preprints and ready to receive your submissions

peercommunityin.org

1 1

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · Sep 12

I once watched their gig grind to a halt for 45 minutes because Anton was mad that Joel was taking some time off from their tour

To get married.

1 1

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · Sep 12

It doesn't sound like a problem. Unless a plan to stop if the estimated effect at peek 1 was under the SESOI was part of the initial plan and incorporated in the alpha spending calculation somehow?

1 2

Reposted by Dorothy Bishop, Cameron Brick, Matt N Williams

Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS) @improvingpsych.org · Sep 11

PsyArXiv's amazing team of 100+ moderators has now approved all preprints that meet the requirements outlined in the updated PsyArXiv policies (is.gd/paxpolicy). Thank you to everyone who volunteered, this was a true community effort! #PsychSciSky

About PsyArXiv – PsyArXiv Blog

What is PsyArXiv? PsyArXiv (psychology archive) is an open preprint archive designed to facilitate rapid dissemination of psychological research. PsyArXiv is a creation of the Society for the…

is.gd

2 20 88

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · Sep 11

The mods will be gradually chasing authors up to get these updated and accepted, but if you know this is you, updating the preprint to list all the authors will speed things along 🙂

Reposted by Brian A. Nosek

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · Sep 11

If you have submitted a preprint to PsyArXiv in the last year or so and it *isn't* currently accessible, there's a good chance it's due to the document listing authors whom you haven't entered in the metadata.

1 9 7

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · Sep 11

You can contact [email protected] to discuss?

Current policies are here in case this helps: blog.psyarxiv.com/about-psyarx...

About PsyArXiv – PsyArXiv Blog

What is PsyArXiv? PsyArXiv (psychology archive) is an open preprint archive designed to facilitate rapid dissemination of psychological research. PsyArXiv is a creation of the Society for the Improvem...

blog.psyarxiv.com

Matt Williams @matthewmatix.bsky.social · Sep 9

Very cool. Deborah was an excellent student in one of my tutorial streams when I was a PhD student. Stoked to see the great things she's gone on to!

1 3

Reposted by Dorothy Bishop, Matt N Williams

Kevin Mitchell @wiringthebrain.bsky.social · Sep 7

When reporting on these kinds of claims, the media should ask:

1. Is this a one-off study or a replicated finding?
2. Is it cherry-picked or consistent?
3. Was the study big enough to be reliable?
4. Did it employ robust statistical methods?
5. How big is the effect size? (If there’s a statistical association, does it amount to a big risk or a small one?)
6. Is there any evidence for a causal link or is it just a correlation?
7. Could the correlation reflect some confounding factor?
8. How does this supposed factor sit in the context of other factors (especially genetic risk for autism, which is very highly heritable)?

12 66 220

Reposted by Jonathan Portes, Mark E. Schaffer, Serge Egelman , and 4 more Jonathan Portes, Mark E. Schaffer, Serge Egelman, Matt N Williams, Ben Rosamond, Gavin Kelly, Tom Louwerse

Sophie E. Hill @sophieehill.bsky.social · Sep 5

"Sweeteners can harm cognitive health equivalent to 1.6 years of ageing, study finds"

Or does it? Let's take a look at this "study"...

www.theguardian.com/food/2025/se...

Sweeteners can harm cognitive health equivalent to 1.6 years of ageing, study finds

Researchers say low- and no-calorie sweeteners appear to affect thinking and memory in middle age

www.theguardian.com

25 170 470