Professor Euan Ritchie
@euanritchie.bsky.social
11K followers 5.1K following 2.8K posts

Dad, ecologist & conservation scientist living on unceded Wurundjeri Country in Narrm. He/him. Research: https://euanritchie.org/ The Conversation: bit.ly/2rjBg9A Nature, SciComm, Politics, Music, Karate, Basketball, Carlton FC 🌈 Ally Born: 331 ppm CO2 .. more

Environmental science 66%
Geography 17%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
euanritchie.bsky.social
Ok, here’s my starter pack! go.bsky.app/4ASwaLv
Non-exhaustive list!

Reposted by Euan G. Ritchie

yungenchee.bsky.social
Fantastic that this attribution research by climate scientists is out in the world!

Hope citizens, schoolchildren & journos use it to hold fossil fuel corps like Woodside & their enablers like SA Premier Malinauskas & fed Enviro Min Watt accountable for deaths & enviro harm fr fossil fuel projects

Reposted by Euan G. Ritchie

yungenchee.bsky.social
👀 on NSW's proposed planning law overhaul! 👀

Read both the ABC & Guardian reports to understand how the NSW govt is using deceptive language & misrepresentations of ICAC's role in shaping the bill to ram through NSW planning law changes that're a bad-faith power grab 1/
'Deceitful' planning laws bypass environment, corruption safeguards, experts say
There are growing fears that a major overhaul of planning laws promoted to fast-track housing development will bypass environmental protections and remove safeguards against corruption.
www.abc.net.au

euanritchie.bsky.social
So, does this mean that those approving these developments could be charged with endangering life?
yungenchee.bsky.social
BREAKING📢 Crack team of climate scientists show "it is no longer defensible for companies proposing new or extended fossil fuel projects to claim the climate harms will be negligible. Our research shows the harms are, in fact, tangible and quantifiable – and no project is too small to matter"
For the first time, we linked a new fossil fuel project to hundreds of deaths. Here’s the impact of Woodside’s Scarborough gas project
The results challenge claims that the climate risks posed by an individual fossil fuel project are negligible or cannot be quantified.
theconversation.com

Reposted by Euan G. Ritchie

yungenchee.bsky.social
Nature paper by Nerilie J. Abram, Nicola Maher, Sarah Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Georgina M. Falster, Terry P. Hughes, Katrin J. Meissner, Louise J. Slater, Andrew D. King, Andrew J. Pitman, Gillian Moon & Wesley Morgan
👇👇👇
Quantifying the regional to global climate impacts of individual fossil fuel projects to inform decision-making - npj Climate Action
npj Climate Action - Quantifying the regional to global climate impacts of individual fossil fuel projects to inform decision-making
www.nature.com
yungenchee.bsky.social
BREAKING📢 Crack team of climate scientists show "it is no longer defensible for companies proposing new or extended fossil fuel projects to claim the climate harms will be negligible. Our research shows the harms are, in fact, tangible and quantifiable – and no project is too small to matter"
For the first time, we linked a new fossil fuel project to hundreds of deaths. Here’s the impact of Woodside’s Scarborough gas project
The results challenge claims that the climate risks posed by an individual fossil fuel project are negligible or cannot be quantified.
theconversation.com

euanritchie.bsky.social
But Vincent, you make it sound so easy...of course, you're right.

euanritchie.bsky.social
Where did I say hire more execs?

euanritchie.bsky.social
It's remarkable Jane is an elected MP.

Reposted by Euan G. Ritchie

robrichards.bsky.social
Universities have been leaders, not followers in the outsourcing industry.

euanritchie.bsky.social
"The standard you walk past is the standard you accept"
- Lieutenant General David Morrison

Could have been written about senior academics unwilling to call out bad behaviour of the academy. There is a constructive & unconstructive way to review papers, & Editors have a job to know the difference.

euanritchie.bsky.social
Yep. It's so embarrassing that unis have so many of the best and brightest, many looking for job security, and yet they outsource work to overpaid and often underwhelming consultants. Hire more staff in-house. Simple.

euanritchie.bsky.social
Simple fix. Hire more staff to do the work of overpaid and often underwhelming consultants, in-house.

euanritchie.bsky.social
IKR, it's utterly absurd that universities, with so many of the best and brightest compared to other organisations, outsource so much work at vast expense. If needed, hire some more staff in-house!

It's the same stupid mentality as the gutting of the Oz public service in preference for the big 4!

Reposted by Adrian Vickers

euanritchie.bsky.social
"One consultant totalled $85,000...almost $3,000 a day".

"Last year, a NTEU report estimated universities across Australia spent $734 million a year on consultants, a practice across the sector which the union has strongly criticised."

Here's an idea, hire more staff instead of consultants on $$$!

Reposted by Adrian Vickers

dustinmulvaney.bsky.social
Republicans are aiming next to dismantle the marine mammal protection act, which protects whales, dolphins, manatees, polar bears, and sea otters.. among other ocean wildlife. 🦦

Reposted by Euan G. Ritchie

kellerfish.bsky.social
If you are a voting member of the IUCN - please consider supporting our motion (113) for Longevity Conservation at the Congress this week
@iucnshark.bsky.social @aciucn.bsky.social @iucn-bctf.bsky.social @sscmarine.bsky.social

iucncongress2025.org/assembly/mot...
MOTION 113
iucncongress2025.org

euanritchie.bsky.social
Mr Percival deserves to make it through to the top ten, vote for #TeamPelican before midnight *tonight*.

Reposted by Euan G. Ritchie

kazz001.bsky.social
Voted. More votes needed as it’s not looking good for the Pelican.

euanritchie.bsky.social
Every day is a good day to vote #TeamPelican.