Partaker in Discourse
@partaker.bsky.social
37 followers 240 following 32 posts
Could you be more specific
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
- you don't need to wait for an aesthetic famine to break out and fascists to arrive promising, like communists, to bring the people bread at any price- and the heads of those who had "stolen" it before.

Ultimately the people are owed a sense of meaning. Identity, too, is a public service. 6/6
The thing is, there are forces that control the present state of the diorama, and a sane political and cultural elite would engage with them directly. Confucius writes about the importance of "not neglecting the ceremonies". If aesthetics are in demand, they can be manufactured- 5/6
They refer all judgements to the diorama as presently constituted; the entire narrative of history is only meaningful in how it finds expression in this final product, to them. The british wear tweed and eat fish-n-chips; they do not wear hoodies and eat curry. It is written. 4/6
The aesthetic of britishness, as they understand it, has fish'n'chips, and somehow not curry. One is present in the diorama, and one is not. The historicity of either of these choices is utterly meaningless to them - not even disputed, but meaningless. They have their preferred diorama. 3/6
It's important to understand that what the right wants is not food or material goods, which are available in abundance, but a bath of aesthetics; the one good that is currently in shortage. 2/6
“This is pure theater—a sensual experience rather than the rational application of ideas... Walter Benjamin interpreted the events that saw the rise of Hitler and Mussolini as the transformation of politics into aesthetics.”

It's all about aesthetics, but that can actually be helpful- 1/6
The British Right are just in total freefall into savagery at this point
Reposted by Partaker in Discourse
pilgrim guy finishes reading a big book, leans way back in his chair and loosens the belt on his hat
Americans' confidence in their own legal system is so low that they are hitting on "it ought to be illegal to make false claims to a court" as a novel proposal for a serious reform that might improve the existing situation
eventually politicians need to start advocating for criminal and civil penalties for people involved in fabricating stories to get citizens incarcerated.

or, put another way: a society that would like to keep functioning has to discourage baldfaced lying, especially by authorities
Body-camera video appears to contradict the government’s claim that Marimar Martinez, 30, drove toward officers before one of them opened fire at her late Saturday morning in Brighton Park, her attorney claimed.
trib.al/9Sxu9IN
Reposted by Partaker in Discourse
I do wonder when media outlets will get interested in ballooning everyday costs. My family's grocery bill has exploded over the past six months and - unlike when a Democrat is president - this is a non-story.
i keep saying this but what i hate most about the ezra kleins of the world is their insistence is that politics is about messaging and triangulating. its never about offering a compelling vision of the world, its about trying desperately to capitulate to whatever moment we are in
Here's a background detail of modern warfare I don't think anyone anticipated
Fiber optic drones can’t be electronically disrupted—because they’re connected by a long, unspooling wire, there’s no signal to hack—but I wondered what all that activity was leaving behind.

The answer is so much cable strewn about near the front line it’s visible from the air.
Fields of fiber optic cable at the front line
Reposted by Partaker in Discourse
The elites of our nation are finding it harder and harder to remember how the Constitution works, and increasingly inclined to understand all US policy as flowing from presidential fiat. Sliding into the authoritarian phantasmagoria.
This @washingtonpost.com editorial doesn’t make it past the second paragraph without a glaring (and telling) factual error.

President Washington didn’t create the War Department in 1789; *Congress* did:

www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...
This kind of response to book bans always fails because it fails to understand the psychology behind the ban. They dont care whether it actually stops anyone reading it. What they want is for Father Stalin, the God in the State, to acknowledge that they are Right and the Bad Men are Wrong.
"The belief that the state should not favor any particular conception of what constitutes a good life for its citizens... this, to them, is what liberalism is for."

Perfect summary; we are ideological Hooverites, locked into a doomed policy by our hidebound conception of what the playing field is
Reposted by Partaker in Discourse
Reposted by Partaker in Discourse
The claim isn’t that memes sway elections, but that human beings are propelled by the ideas in their heads, and the ideas get in their heads mostly through social mechanisms and communication, and very rarely by independently observing changes in their surroundings and drawing a conclusion.
The thing is Stancil Thought is so unbelievably bleak I can’t believe it, because I’d just give up. Truly, if elections are swayed only by memes and not by actually doing anything that helps people, what’s the point of.., anything really? So I just need to decide it’s bs
This actually very neatly sums up the manner in which democratic messaging fails - Republicans understand "show, don't tell."

Democrats quote accurate statistics about Arkansas, Republicans show individual videos from California. Which place does the public then think is more dangerous?
Reposted by Partaker in Discourse
My favorite “cities are a war zone” thing is a tweet I remember where someone took a video of a dozen children playing soccer and captioned it “Minneapolis has fallen”. I kept replaying it thinking I had missed something but no, it was just that they weren’t white
I always thought the big fight in trumps first term about having a giant military parade was indicative of something deeper.
Reposted by Partaker in Discourse
not everyone has agreed with me about this but my read is that schumer is essentially telling donald trump to frame mahmoud khalil for something, anything, so that he can openly support his expulsion. trump does not seem to respect schumer enough to do this.
one insane thing about schumer's statements about khalil is that trump has been perfectly clear that he has not suspected of a crime. schumer nonetheless provided trump with an opportunity to confabulate a crime both trump and rubio have denied occurred. just lying to defend the president.
Reposted by Partaker in Discourse
Something that's been clear to me for some time is that a lot of progressive advocacy and politics has overindexed on finding just the right combination of words to say while ignoring the fact that no media ecosystem exists where people might actually hear you say them. New from @mmfa.bsky.social
"Is zero singular?"
"Singular means one. Is it one?"
"No?"
"Done. Ship it"
In a party of McClellans, he's a Grant