Natacha
banner
natacha.bsky.social
Natacha
@natacha.bsky.social
Trans woman 🏳️‍⚧️ Sociologist & Agnotologist, anti-Brexit. She/her. All opinions expressed here are my own. 🇵🇸

Link to academic publications: https://goldsmiths.academia.edu/NatachaKennedy

“Thomas Mann:
“Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil.”
Reposted by Natacha
The boats the regime is claiming are going from Venezuela to the US would need to refuel over 20 times to get to Miami.

They are lying to us.
December 3, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Reposted by Natacha
The idea that I would ever work with Tories is absurd. If you don't believe me just ask Lee Anderson, Nadine Dorries, Danny Kruger, Andrea Jenkyns, Jonathan Gullis, Sarah Pochin, Jake Berry, Marco Longhi, Peter Bone...
December 3, 2025 at 8:08 AM
Reposted by Natacha
If you are:
December 3, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Reposted by Natacha
Something needs to be done about the Guardian and the New Statesman. It ought to be utterly unacceptable that they sing from the same songsheet as the rest of the media on this.
December 3, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Reposted by Natacha
Contact us if you have been affected by the policy changes of Girl Guiding or the Women's Institute. This could be as an individual, or because you lead a local Brownie group who don't want this policy change. We want to help protect trans inclusion.

goodlawproject.org/about/contact/
December 3, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Reposted by Natacha
"Respectful and understanding" - perhaps they were. I'm not. I don't think any of us should be. I think orgs that do this need to pay a heavy price for doing it. They're afraid of the power transphobes have: and so we must endeavour to build power of our own and to wield it uncompromisingly.
This part is *infuriating*. This cis woman heard an 80 year old trans woman say, 'This is the only place I've been respected as a woman IN MY LIFE.'

And did not immediately think, 'I will fight every inch like a dying badger to keep her in my organization.'

Absolutely pathetic.
December 3, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Important to remember;

The Trans Girl Guides ban is only happening because

*Starmer*

wants it to happen.

Starmer is harming children.
Let’s be clear about who is responsible for trans girls being excluded from the Guides.

Keir Starmer
100%

He could have overturned the injustice of the flawed Supreme Court any time, but CHOSE not to. So he is responsible for these girls being harmed. There’s a word for adults who harm children.
December 3, 2025 at 4:48 PM
Boy Scouts have included all genders for a long time. There is no reason why Girl Guides can’t do the same. The number of cis boys who would want to join would likely be zero or very close to zero.
December 3, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Reposted by Natacha
A statement from the Trans Greens regarding a recent decision by Girlguiding to exclude girls and young women who were not recorded female at birth.
December 3, 2025 at 12:03 AM
Reposted by Natacha
Imagine if bigoted billionaires and privileged ‘gender critical’ transphobes with the ear of the right-wing media had put their money and energy into lobbying about *this* - rather than obsessing over banning a handful of trans girls and elderly trans women from Girl Guides & the WI!?? 😣😤
More than a QUARTER of police forces in England and Wales still haven’t implemented basic policies for investigating sexual offences.

It’s like they don’t care. It’s scandalous, but it’s borne out by the experiences of so many women – women like Nina Cresswell.
https://bbc.in/48jP20k
Sarah Everard report finds quarter of forces lack basic policies on sexual offences
The report, four years after the 33-year-old's murder, says urgent action is needed to prevent violent, sexual attacks against women.
www.bbc.co.uk
December 3, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Reposted by Natacha
Cis people, do better! It's up to us!
#standupfightback
#transrightsarehumanrights
❤️🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍⚧️❤️
December 3, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Reposted by Natacha
Telling a targeted, hyperscrutinized, vilified population that you have no choice but to comply with mulching us is not a praiseworthy stance!!!!
December 3, 2025 at 7:14 AM
Reposted by Natacha
When will those Labour MPs who don't support the exclusion of trans people from society get together and tell the Cabinet 'Not In Our Name'?

Because, with respect, it is well past time for them to do som
December 3, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Reposted by Natacha
To be clear, WI and GG trustees will have been told they faced personal liability including bankruptcy for breaching fiduciary duty by involving their organizations in legal proceedings they might well lose.

They should be publicly fucking angry and uncivilised about the people responsible.
December 3, 2025 at 12:07 PM
Reposted by Natacha
If you’re a Guide Leader you can join this public Facebook group, created to push back against the trans-exclusionary policy they’ve just adopted…

👉 www.facebook.com/share/g/16i8...
December 3, 2025 at 10:18 AM
Reposted by Natacha
It’s totally devastating that some groups and orgs have been pushed into such a position. Excluding our trans siblings is a backwards step. One day we will look back at this period in time and realise, what many of us know already. It’s utterly shameful and wrong.
Women’s Institute will no longer accept trans women as members from April
Exclusive: CEO says decision taken with ‘utmost regret and sadness’ after supreme court ruling on definition of a woman
www.theguardian.com
December 3, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Reposted by Natacha
People need to understand that the neoreactionary movement is one thing with different faces it presents to the public, as demonstrated in the recent BBC shenanigans: the gender crackpots, domestic fascists and genocide enthusiasts are all on the same page with the international fascists.
December 3, 2025 at 1:45 PM
This is an important point. The GLP case hasn't happened yet, and the EHRC "guidance" hasn't happened yet. Are these groups trying get these capitulations out before these?
Which raises the question of the timing.

Why do these announcements come together. It's been months since the "Supreme" Court ruling, and the guidance isn't out.
December 3, 2025 at 1:23 PM
Reposted by Natacha
The institutionally-transphobic Guardian did not change its genitally-obsessed spots

"historic and definitive ruling" - did Maya Forestater write this for you?
December 3, 2025 at 12:51 PM
Reposted by Natacha
📢 NION Women Statement on trans women and girls being excluded from Girlguiding and the Women's Institute.

We are deeply saddened that both Girlguiding and @womensinstitute.bsky.social have been placed under pressure that has resulted in trans women and girls being excluded from their organisations
December 3, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Reposted by Natacha
One of the worst aspects of this is that the same groups making these legal threats then go around saying that this type of exclusion and discrimination makes transitioning so negatively affect one's life that no one should do it as if it's a choice.
Trans women has been welcomed at the Women's Institute since the 1970s and one member is in her 80's and has been a member for decades. This is pure bigotry pushed by legal threats backed monetarily by JK Rowling.

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
Women’s Institute will no longer accept trans women as members from April
Exclusive: CEO says decision taken with ‘utmost regret and sadness’ after supreme court ruling on definition of a woman
www.theguardian.com
December 3, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Reposted by Natacha
Stuck on this gutting sentence on the Women’s Institute decision. For young people it’s watching the world close to them before they’ve had a shot at life, for older women it’s watching half a century of progress vanish. Either way it’s grossly, unbearably cruel.

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
December 3, 2025 at 1:15 PM
“…people now feeling empowered to impose their view of who you are on you.”

In other words

*fascism*

“Gender-critical” transphobia is fascism.
And that's basically how society still works. If someone says they're a woman or man, then most folk just accept that. What has been legitimised in the UK and USA in the last few years is people now feeling empowered to impose their view of who you are on you. 3/n
December 3, 2025 at 8:18 AM