banner
matthiasamrhein.bsky.social
@matthiasamrhein.bsky.social
Reposted
"The educated poor is a class that used to make up the creative life of New York City....A reasonable cost of living & local & national programs [made] a dignified life accessible for more Americans & gave people the ability to provide for themselves and their families while still living creatively.
November 23, 2025 at 7:05 PM
Reposted
and Noah will start complaining incessantly about that force the minute it starts representing a group Twitter tells him to not like
November 23, 2025 at 8:27 AM
Reposted
NVIDIA earnings were a mirage. The market figured it out surprisingly fast. NVIDIA bump evaporated.

I don’t know how this information can enter the system without exploding the bubble.

But sometimes bezzles visible for months before crash.

Waiting for the feds?

open.substack.com/pub/shanakaa...
November 22, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Reposted
Inshallah
Stephen Miller going into the white nationalist reading room only to discover Trump has replaced everything with feminist zines
November 21, 2025 at 11:25 PM
Reposted
They love to brand themselves as concerned citizens for cities when really they just want to lock up homeless and mentally ill people and keep the streets clean magically without admitting a role for the requisite government funding or living wages/right to bargain for sanitation workers
November 21, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Typical Nicole, she takes the caricature of labels at face value, she has no interest in assessing Mamdani's state assembly tenure, and she lumps someone with genuine philosophy into the 'populist' crowd along with the Manhattan Institute's favorite president.
In @nytopinion.nytimes.com

Zohran Mamdani “seems to think the historic nature of his victory allows him to steamroll state government,” Nicole Gelinas writes. “But he will face political and legal barriers if he tries to treat Albany as a mere inconvenience.”
Opinion | How to Resist a Populist Mayor and a Populist President
Hochul can show how Democrats wary of a mayor-elect’s populist brand of socialism can push back against it.
nyti.ms
November 21, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Terrible video, they don't even answer in any detail 'what economists got wrong about tariffs', they shift the focus of the analysis from the original tariffs from April, to the insane tariffs on China, but don't calibrate their analysis for the present status... www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn7s...
What Economists Got Wrong on Tariffs
YouTube video by Bloomberg Originals
www.youtube.com
November 21, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Reposted
You can catch the YouTube Premiere of today's @cancelmedaddy.bsky.social episode right now! youtu.be/ss79spmJo3k
The Death of the Anti-Trans Ad: Why Democrats’ 2025 Wins Changed Everything (ft Laurel Powell)
YouTube video by Cancel Me, Daddy - Media & Politics Podcast
youtu.be
November 20, 2025 at 9:00 PM
Would collective bargaining agreements with cost of living indexed wage minimums, and legalization and formalization of undocumented workers not precisely address this issue?
i'll be charitable here: the creation of a bifurcated labor force is a primary way of trying to solve the illiberal's dilemma. the herrenvolk get high labor demand while living in a subaltern world of low labor demand--

www.liberalcurrents.com/the-illibera...
November 19, 2025 at 9:17 PM
Reposted
anyways this shit all sucks and is dumb and is--once stated clearly--OBVIOUSLY, INHERENTLY UNPRODUCTIVE because you are excluding a huge fraction of workers from being as productive as they could be
November 18, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Reposted
Also, it's really weird how Thomas Massie is talking like a resistlib now
November 19, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Reposted
"We're pro-immigration, we just need to make sure we can address the J̶e̶w̶i̶s̶h̶ Muslim question by outbreeding them to win over thoughtful cross pressured voters"
Obviously, we want more immigrants, it’s one of our founding principals, but we also don’t want things to happen that will set support for more immigration back in the long term

All that said, Twitter only allows editing in the 1st hour, so not easily done.
November 19, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Reposted
This is mostly likely the section of the law that Johnson was talking about when he said he hoped the senate would amend it. Lol.
Turns out he already prepared for this
November 19, 2025 at 8:36 PM
Reposted
the enthusiasm for primarying hakeem jeffries on bluesky feels motivated by a lot of aggressive nyc-centric online left folks and feelings about jeffries’ position on israel

all of that makes sense

but it definitely feels like it misses the way our system of government even works
November 19, 2025 at 6:49 PM
Reposted
investments in solar power lower costs for consumers so much that in some places they're literally giving away free energy during the day, but sure.
it won’t feel good to say but it is crucial to actually admit this:

democrats’ pivot to affordability is already seeing them tear up climate policies

and any effort to lower costs for consumers will conflict with investments in renewables, unless even more money is poured into them
Democrats’ New Affordability Message Is Complicating Climate Policy
The transition to clean energy will be expensive today, even if it’ll be cheaper in the long run.
heatmap.news
November 19, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Reposted
This is false and this article conflates a bunch of different state policies and throws in Mamdani supposedly backing away from climate even though he stood behind Local Law 97, which is the biggest thing NYC has done on this front.
November 19, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Reposted
It didn't get talked about by seemingly anyone but Mamdani himself but his public procurement plan for heat pumps, induction ranges etc is actually a capital-S Socialist policy, one of the few the city can execute. Paired with building code reform, this could be revolutionary
This is false and this article conflates a bunch of different state policies and throws in Mamdani supposedly backing away from climate even though he stood behind Local Law 97, which is the biggest thing NYC has done on this front.
November 19, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Reposted
Democrats think they have a winning message against Trump.

There's just one problem: climate policy is getting in the way.

Here's @robinsonmeyer.bsky.social with the full story:

heatmap.news/politics/dem...
Democrats’ New Affordability Message Is Complicating Climate Policy
The transition to clean energy will be expensive today, even if it’ll be cheaper in the long run.
heatmap.news
November 18, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Reposted
it won’t feel good to say but it is crucial to actually admit this:

democrats’ pivot to affordability is already seeing them tear up climate policies

and any effort to lower costs for consumers will conflict with investments in renewables, unless even more money is poured into them
Democrats’ New Affordability Message Is Complicating Climate Policy
The transition to clean energy will be expensive today, even if it’ll be cheaper in the long run.
heatmap.news
November 19, 2025 at 2:47 PM
Reposted
State-level Democrats have embraced affordability as a new theory of how to win.

That approach is reshaping some of their climate policies. Across the country, Dems are slow-walking GHG mandates or accepting more fossil supply to help stabilize energy prices. heatmap.news/politics/dem...
Democrats’ New Affordability Message Is Complicating Climate Policy
The transition to clean energy will be expensive today, even if it’ll be cheaper in the long run.
heatmap.news
November 19, 2025 at 5:08 PM
Gosh, who could've predicted this? And countries in the Global South imposing tariffs on Chinese goods? No one could have seen these things coming.
just incredible scenes, we're gonna run out of 'fell for it again' awards
November 19, 2025 at 9:42 AM
Reposted
I think the correct thing to do is run Democrats well matched to their districts. Run sewer socialists in blue cities, wine mom ordoliberals in suburbs, angry Blue Dogs in red-purple districts, Cato Institute types in Ohio Basin exurbs, and MGP in rural West Idaho
November 18, 2025 at 5:06 PM
I'm sorry but digitalization is so much worse in the US, the trains do not function better in the US, the traffic is so much worse. For all of its faults, and the UK has many, it is much closer to the NL when it comes to access to and effective utilization of basic services. He's describing the US.
This is a funny remark from one of America's premier pundits because the UK does, in fact, have several examples of things that do (or at least c/sh/would) function impressively well, and when they fail in their mission it's often attributable to Americanisation, i.e. private enterprise.
November 18, 2025 at 8:22 AM
Reposted
This is what ally ship looks like to me.
November 15, 2025 at 8:43 PM