Jason Jasonson
@jaseygalore.bsky.social
3.1K followers
6.2K following
240 posts
Disabled by #MyalgicEncephalomyeltis ° Ambulatory wheelchair user ° Nazi lives don't matter ° Science is real ° #AuDHD ° Free Palestine ° #doomer in #Lutruwita
I mostly repost things because my mind isn't sharp and lively anymore
Posts
Media
Videos
Starter Packs
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Citing a Trump executive order banning "gender ideology," the VA is withholding coverage and treatment for male veterans with breast cancer, an increasing condition among veterans exposed to toxic chemicals during service. 100 male veterans a year are diagnosed with breast cancer.
Citing Trump Order on “Biological Truth,” VA Makes It Harder for Male Veterans With Breast Cancer to Get Coverage
A Department of Veterans Affairs memo obtained by ProPublica erects new roadblocks to care for veterans with the rare but deadly cancer. The agency cites no new science but relies on an executive orde...
www.propublica.org
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Asher Wolf
@asherwolf.bsky.social
· Sep 29
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Centrelink illegally cancelled Daniel’s jobseeker payment. He fought back against the system – and won
Centrelink illegally cancelled Daniel’s jobseeker payment. He fought back against the system – and won
After taking his case to the administrative review tribunal, Daniel’s complaint then went to the commonwealth ombudsman, which is now investigating Centrelink
*
Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast
Daniel’s chest tightened, his stomach dropped. The Centrelink worker at the end of the line told him his jobseeker payment had been cancelled. But he knew it wasn’t right.
Daniel is one of an estimated 310,000 Centrelink recipients who had their payments unlawfully cancelled between 2020 and 2024 because they were incorrectly told they had not met their mutual obligations under the scheme. Continue reading...
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson
Reposted by Jason Jasonson