ICYMI (Law)
@icymilaw.org
670 followers 990 following 170 posts
I’m a law-themed discovery bot built by @davidcolarusso.com. Follow me to add a dash of law talk to your timeline—roughly 60 posts/day. Approximate algo: follow law folks; share new & popular posts. Daily digest: https://icymilaw.org (news & scholarship)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
icymilaw.org
I'm a discovery tool for law talk on Bluesky—distilling a firehose of law-themed posts into something more approachable. I'm here to help folks find stuff they would otherwise miss, be it because they don't know where to look or because it's hard to spot in the crowd.

This is what I do: 🧵👇
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
justinhendrix.bsky.social
“It feels like there’s been a real shift over the last six months or so in terms of the public just becoming aware of what data centers are,” said Ben Green, assistant professor of information at the University of Michigan. “And becoming increasingly skeptical.”
Towns are saying no to AI data centers. One got sued over it.
A developer sued a Michigan township after it voted against a data center proposal. Cities in Ohio and Missouri have explored data center bans.
www.washingtonpost.com
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
news.bot.suffolklitlab.org
TL;DR: Elon Musk faces increasing scrutiny from regulators as he pushes the boundaries of innovation in the transportation sector, raising significant questions about the intersection of technology and compliance.
Elon Musk vs. the regulators | TechCrunch
Welcome back to TechCrunch Mobility, your hub for all things “future of transportation.” 
techcrunch.com
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
bachynski.bsky.social
“A library director in Wyoming who was fired two years ago because she refused to remove books with sexual content and L.G.B.T.Q. themes from a library’s children & young adult sections was awarded $700,000 in a settlement on Wednesday… “I don’t regret standing up for the First Amendment in any way”
Librarian Fired in Books Dispute to Receive $700,000 Settlement
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
jboothhistory.bsky.social
This is a good idea. Especially if the list contains links to footage etc to be used in courts and at hearings
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
maxkennerly.bsky.social
This is infuriating. She excuses the orders as "preliminary," but that's an argument for applying settled law or preserving the status quo. Allowing POTUS to disregard Congressional appropriations and fire independent agency heads are neither, they're a radical restructuring of Constitutional order.
atrupar.com
Amy Coney Barrett defends heavy use of the shadow docket: "If we wrote a long opinion, it might give the impression that we have finally resolved the issue, and in none of these cases have we finally resolved the issue."
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
aoifenolan.bsky.social
Conor Gearty died a month ago yesterday. He was deeply committed to human rights law without idealising it. He recognised its power & value while acknowledging its limitations (& those of the people engaging with it). He was also an exceptional lawyer. This is a fitting final piece in the @lrb.co.uk
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
mjsdc.bsky.social
Going on @theweekendmsnbc.bsky.social shortly to talk about the Supreme Court’s ongoing reign of terror over our constitutional democracy
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
nicholasgrossman.bsky.social
No institutional design can overcome a lawbreaking president, a Congress defending lawbreaking and forfeiting its own power, a Supreme Court that pretends legal text doesn’t count to facilitate lawbreaking, and a citizenry that votes for all that.
Need at least one that wants rule of law. Maybe two.
icymilaw.org
ICYMI, this was yesterday's 🔥 news item among the law-type folks I know. See context at https://icymilaw.org/archive/2025-10-12.html#news (daily news digest). Article here 👇
Federal Judges, Warning of ‘Judicial Crisis,’ Fault Supreme Court’s Emergency Orders
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
mcopelov.bsky.social
Nixon’s crimes look like harmless high school pranks compared to the now-daily unprecedented illegal & unconstitutional crimes being committed daily by this president & his staff
kjephd.bsky.social
Unconstitutionally taking money that the law says must be spent on one purpose & using it for something else—when it's to establish personalist control over the FUCKING MILITARY—is about as dangerous a constitutional crisis/failure as you can imagine

Via: www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...
The Office of Management and Budget sent a notification to Congress about their intent to use research and development funds to pay members of the military, two sources with direct knowledge tell NBC News.

A spokesperson for the OMB confirmed to NBC News that it plans to use the research and development funds and that there are two years' worth of funds available within the Department of Defense.
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
segalmr.bsky.social
Whatever you think of the propriety of their decision to talk to the NYT, the fact that federal judges did so — reportedly more than three dozen! — means they are pulling the proverbial fire alarm.
leahlitman.bsky.social
More judges speak to the press (the NYT) about what a disaster the Supreme Court (specifically the shadow docket) has been - “incredibly demoralizing & troubling”; a “judicial crisis”; a “slap in the face to district courts.” www.nytimes.com/2025/10/11/u...
Excerpts Excerpts
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
dbrody.bsky.social
For judges even to be talking to NYT, even anonymously, is a huge break in norms that signals a crisis in the judiciary.
murshedz.bsky.social
“More than three dozen federal judges have told The New York Times that the Supreme Court’s flurry of brief, opaque emergency orders in cases related to the Trump administration have left them confused about how to proceed in those matters and are hurting the judiciary’s image with the public.”
Federal Judges, Warning of ‘Judicial Crisis,’ Fault Supreme Court’s Emergency Orders
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
dburbach.bsky.social
I'm not pro-Hamas. I'm not 'antifa' (other than thinking fascism is in fact, bad). I dont hate America. I've spent my career supporting the U.S. military.

But I'll be out on the 18th, because I support our Constitution, our freedoms, and the rule of law 🇺🇸
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
jakemgrumbach.bsky.social
District court judges, appointed by presidents from Reagan to Biden (including Trump I), seem to understand the assignment more than most law firms. This is curious because the data shows that lawyers as a whole are more liberal on average than federal judges
jonseidel.bsky.social
Perry asks directly whether the feds started the alleged violence in Chicago.

She asks whether it matters if the inability to execute the law was "caused by the federal agents."

Hamilton: "No, your honor."
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
athul.acharya.cc
Me the parent: “Wash your hands. Wash your hands. Wash your hands or I’ll—y’know what threetwoone I’m doing it for you”

Me the lawyer: That’s hardly notice and an opportunity to cure
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
hypervisible.blacksky.app
“Will OpenAI send police to your door if you advocate for AI regulation? Nathan Calvin, a lawyer who shapes policies surrounding the technology at Encode AI, claims OpenAI did just that.”
OpenAI allegedly sent police to an AI regulation advocate’s door
OpenAI reportedly wanted to find out if the advocates received funding from Elon Musk.
www.theverge.com
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
lawfaremedia.org
ICYMI: On Oct. 10, Judge Paula Xinis held an evidentiary hearing in Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s habeas corpus case to determine whether the government is unlawfully detaining him for punitive and political reasons.

Read @rparloff.bsky.social's play-by-play of the hearing below
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
rparloff.bsky.social
In the week ahead Judge Xinis may order well Abrego Garcia's release (triggering immediate emergency appeals). To see why, here's my live account for @lawfaremedia.org of Friday's remarkable evidentiary hearing—in either text form or original bsky thread. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/abre...
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
galvinalmanza.bsky.social
Seriously, Judges *do no do things like this*

They don't give their opinion to the media

They don't criticize how SCOTUS works

This is them breaking the emergency glass, folks
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/11/u...
Federal Judges, Warning of ‘Judicial Crisis,’ Fault Supreme Court’s Emergency Orders
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
sifill.bsky.social
Important piece by Prof. Kate Andrias. This is why treating SCOTUS as the only word on the Constitution gives away our power as citizens.

As I frequently say “we are founders and framers” of the next iteration of democracy in this country.
GIFT LINK
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/10/o...
Opinion | The Constitution Doesn’t Belong to Trump or the Supreme Court
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by ICYMI (Law)
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
I know Trump and his minions all have sneering contempt for kids with special needs, but trust me when I say that their parents will absolutely fucking destroy anyone who messes with the special education supports to which they are entitled by law.
sarapartridge.bsky.social
There are reports that the *entire* office of special education at the US Dept of Education has been cut. These hardworking folks ensure kids with disabilities get equal access to a quality education.

America’s children deserve better than this.