#Neoreaction
If you want something on Yudkowsky, go for @eruditorumpress.com's Neoreaction: a Basilisk. Dunno about Klein.
November 6, 2025 at 3:57 AM Everybody can reply
1 likes
I think for Wall Street Trump will end up filed away as a fun decade where they got to say slurs in the office, just like the 80s were a decade long coke party. But they’ll roll with the times. But tech has gone all in on this and the cultural roots of neoreaction are deep in SV
November 5, 2025 at 4:31 PM Everybody can reply
3 reposts 19 likes
Thank you for your answer, it does make sense! Where is that chapter? Is it in Neoreaction a Basilisk?
November 3, 2025 at 9:39 AM Everybody can reply
vibecoding neoreaction
October 30, 2025 at 11:20 PM Everybody can reply
3 likes
I’ve been reading “Neoreaction: A Basilisk” and this dude’s stupidity is beyond everything I knew beforehand, and I knew a lot.
Eliezer Yudkowsky is what happens when a very, very stupid person spends a lot of time thinking very hard about what it would be like to be smart.
October 28, 2025 at 1:56 PM Everybody can reply
9 reposts 28 likes 1 saves
Nix
Vance stands for whatever Peter Thiel tells him to stand for, so we can predict Vance's positions by examining Peter Thiel's ideology (a combination of neoreaction and transhumanism).
October 27, 2025 at 11:00 PM Everybody can reply
4 likes
No, the people who lied the country into Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan are not "suddenly 'evil'" because of Twitter.

Their class interests compel them to corncob and lose arguments successively until they flinch their way into fascism or neoreaction, and that's how class conflict works.
It is Twitter! Like guys I’m telling you the thing that is collapsing basic norms and making white supremacy mainstream again and giving our formally centrist pundits a Strange New Respect for completely overt neo-Nazis is Twitter! You HAVE to stop ignoring it. It is going to destroy our society
I can't believe I used to admire him, holy shit what is happening?
October 26, 2025 at 11:48 PM Everybody can reply
2 likes
NEOREACTION: A BASILISK by Elizabeth Sandifer may be the sort of book you want?
October 24, 2025 at 6:04 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 13 likes 1 saves
iirc at least part of the context here was david-gerard-adjacent people on tumblr going around telling everyone yudkowsky cultivated the nrx movement, culminating(?) in the book "neoreaction a basilisk" which has this thesis
October 17, 2025 at 2:04 AM Everybody can reply
2 likes
Was it neoreaction Siskind said he was promoting, or racial-IQ hucksters, or are those the same thing, or was he vague enough that we can't tell which?
October 16, 2025 at 11:02 PM Everybody can reply
7 likes
"Neoreaction a Basilisk: Essays on and Around the Alt-Right" by Elizabeth Sandifer goes into the whole NRx Dark Enlightenment Philosophy that these people are saturated in. I recommend it, but I warn you all; they believe some really dumb shit.
“Everyone who is rich enough or close enough to reactionary politics is effectively in a cult with beliefs loonier than the median Heaven’s Gate member” is a relatively straightforward description of the current moment. I don’t know how we live like this
October 10, 2025 at 4:50 PM Everybody can reply
13 reposts 26 likes 3 saves
This is libertarianism and neoreaction in a nutshell. The reactionaries advocating for a strong leader never think they'll be the ones to be thrown out of a 14th floor window. And the libertarians never think they'll be the ones who are too poor to afford basic care.
October 7, 2025 at 2:51 PM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 14 likes
From Curtis Yarvin's Substack "Grey Mirror of the Nihilistic Prince":
#Neoreaction #DarkEnlightenment

open.substack.com/pub/graymirr...
October 7, 2025 at 11:20 AM Everybody can reply
I already wrote Neoreaction a Basilisk tho
October 6, 2025 at 3:19 AM Everybody can reply
2 likes
Super. Voici un autre texte intéressant. Il ne fait pas mention de la néoréaction proprement parlé mais le changement civilisationelle y est bien évoqué. Le Bruno en question vient de faire paraître un essai. Un homme avec un bon back ground.Voici l'article (question/réponse) du Grand Continent.
Trump et la Tech : faire face au proto-fascisme numérique
Aux États-Unis, les entreprises du numérique sont en train de donner à un dirigeant autoritaire les moyens de transformer une république en dictature fasciste. Contrôler l’information pour cultiver ...
legrandcontinent.eu
October 4, 2025 at 10:25 PM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 1 likes
This is actually a really bad explanation, it conflates Land's earlier work with the CCRU (90s) as compatible with his work with the "Dark Enlightenment" or Neoreaction(late 00s) following the CCRU falling apart and a psychological break (both around the mid-00s). There's video of him explaining it.
October 4, 2025 at 3:11 PM Everybody can reply
Try again.

Neoreaction is a global phenomenon that can’t be blamed on China rivalry because China didn’t invent the Internet.
Benn Steil considers how the political historian Carl Schmitt, who rose to prominence in the German Weimar Republic of the 1920s, would view the United States’ turn toward authoritarianism:
Reading Schmitt in Beijing
How China’s rise provoked America’s illiberal turn.
www.foreignaffairs.com
October 3, 2025 at 9:40 PM Everybody can reply
Gerade gelesen christian meyer, digitalisierung und faschisierung, argument nr 335

Sonst liz sandifer, neoreaction: a basilisk
October 2, 2025 at 12:40 PM Everybody can reply
4 likes
neoreaction isn’t *not* neofeudalism but, apart from noting the specific thinkers involved whose ideas go beyond merely that, is also very specifically neofeudalism whose rationale is entwined with masculinity as a vector of technology and technology as a vector of masculinity
October 2, 2025 at 4:19 AM Everybody can reply
2 reposts 11 likes
Apparently so. I just rechecked my dissertation and was surprised to find “dark enlightenment” doesn’t appear in it, I only call it neoreaction. Now I’m trying to remember when that term appeared (dissertation was defended in 2015 but most sources are 2014 or earlier)
October 2, 2025 at 3:15 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 11 likes
liz
humorous reaction 2: you read Neoreaction a Basilisk at least once, right? i’m thinking a lot about how fascists’ obsession with purity is really quite a reasonable human reaction on facing the madness of the oneness of things
October 1, 2025 at 11:23 PM Everybody can reply
1 likes
'Neoreaction a Basilisk' by Elizabeth Sandifer features a fun exploration of some of his ideas, would highly recommend
October 1, 2025 at 10:32 AM Everybody can reply
1 likes
it's not a question of whether it was "guaranteed", which is a retroactive claim about prediction, it's about whether it was worth distinguishing as a separate thing from "neoreaction" (already acknowledged) and "transhumanists who happen to be reactionaries" (already acknowledged)
September 30, 2025 at 6:39 PM Everybody can reply
1 likes