Adopt AI or face disruption

Reposted by Steve Peers, Jaakko Husa, Brooke Harrington , and 1 more Steve Peers, Jaakko Husa, Brooke Harrington, Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò

26%

Scholar power: 26.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Steve Peers	22%	27	11.4%
🎓 Jaakko Husa	16%	14	6.0%
🎓 Brooke Harrington	12%	19	5.2%
🎓 Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò	10%	18	4.2%
Total			26.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

9.4 h

107

26.9%

Ranking score

0.132

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

404 Media

@404media.co

An attorney in a New York Supreme Court commercial case got caught using AI in his filings, and then got caught using AI again in the brief where he had to explain why he used AI, according to court documents filed earlier this month.

🔗 www.404media.co/lawyer-using...

Lawyer Caught Using AI While Explaining to Court Why He Used AI

The attorney not only submitted AI-generated fake citations in a brief for his clients, but also included “multiple new AI-hallucinated citations and quotations” in the process of opposing a motion fo...

www.404media.co

14 110 320

by John Palfrey

22%

Scholar power: 22.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 John Palfrey	15%	26	22.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

59.0%

7.3 h

0

22.9%

Ranking score

0.092

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

John Palfrey

@palfrey.org

Humans created AI, and we can still shape its future. That is why @macfound joined a broad coalition of our peers to launch Humanity AI, a new initiative to keep people at the center of our AI future.

Learn more: humanityai.ai

Home - Humanity AI

Our future with AI can and will be what we make it. Humanity AI is uniting philanthropy in a broad […]

humanityai.ai

1 4 11

by International Monetary Fund

38%

Scholar power: 38.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 International Monetary Fund	18%	50	38.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

8.3 h

26

38.2%

Ranking score

0.07

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Colin Murray

27%

Scholar power: 27.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Colin Murray	18%	25	27.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

6.1 h

5

27.0%

Ranking score

0.059

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Colin Murray

@colinmurray.bsky.social

Grok has been fed a diet of raw Policy Exchange papers for days and now doesn't feel too great....

Roland Smith @rolandmcs.bsky.social · 6h

Well, it's certainly *artificial* intelligence.

1 3 17

Reposted by Brigid Laffan, Jože P. Damijan

19%

Scholar power: 19.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Brigid Laffan	24%	27	12.5%
🎓 Jože P. Damijan	13%	28	6.9%
Total			19.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

17.7 h

150

19.3%

Ranking score

0.059

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Federica Genovese

16%

Scholar power: 16.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Federica Genovese	16%	12	16.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

61.0%

19.2 h

0

16.6%

Ranking score

0.049

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Federica Genovese

@fgenovese.bsky.social

AI will have all types of effects on skilled work, some bad some perhaps good, but everyone who cares about climate disruption needs to explicitly confront that ramping data centers *in the current economic model* (with the current people in charge) will only accelerate greenhouse gas emissions.

Rei Takver @rtakver.bsky.social · 1d

OpenAI *really* isn't hiding its intention to power the AI boom with fossil fuels.

New from me @desmog.com

www.desmog.com/2025/10/13/o...

OpenAI’s New Energy Chief Is a Trump Administration Natural Gas Evangelist

The ChatGPT creator hired John McCarrick, a gas-loving former Trump energy official, to guide how the company will source huge quantities of power for its colossal supercomputers.

www.desmog.com

3 17 48

by Justin Lewis

22%

Scholar power: 22.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Lewis	19%	16	22.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

7.8 h

3

22.8%

Ranking score

0.049

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Justin Lewis

@whenisbirths.bsky.social

Creatively, the prospect of AI taking over is an exhausting, boring slog.

6

by Pierre‐Olivier Gourinchas

36%

Scholar power: 36.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Pierre‐Olivier Gourinchas	17%	51	36.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

8.3 h

0

36.4%

Ranking score

0.045

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas

@pgourinchas.bsky.social

Other forces are at play: AI investment is booming, echoing the dot-com era, while China's property sector struggles and fiscal pressures mount. These dynamics create a complex, uneven recovery.

1

by Jaakko Husa

18%

Scholar power: 18.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jaakko Husa	16%	14	18.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

3.5 h

1

18.0%

Ranking score

0.041

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Jaakko Husa

@husajaakko.bsky.social

Why I used AI explained by AI. You can't make this shit up. 😂😂😂

404 Media @404media.co · 9h

An attorney in a New York Supreme Court commercial case got caught using AI in his filings, and then got caught using AI again in the brief where he had to explain why he used AI, according to court documents filed earlier this month.

🔗 www.404media.co/lawyer-using...

Lawyer Caught Using AI While Explaining to Court Why He Used AI

The attorney not only submitted AI-generated fake citations in a brief for his clients, but also included “multiple new AI-hallucinated citations and quotations” in the process of opposing a motion fo...

www.404media.co

1 6

by Cass R. Sunstein

53%

Scholar power: 53.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Cass R. Sunstein	15%	139	53.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

14.4 h

4

53.1%

Ranking score

0.04

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Steve Peers

11%

Scholar power: 11.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Steve Peers	22%	27	11.4%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

15.7 h

33

11.4%

Ranking score

0.034

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Dmitry Grozoubinski

@explaintrade.com

I'm not a grand strategist but perhaps the US may regret putting all its economic eggs into a single AI basket it needs Chinese cooperation to weave.

4 33 230

Reposted by Steve Peers

11%

Scholar power: 11.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Steve Peers	22%	27	11.4%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

14.1 h

19

11.4%

Ranking score

0.03

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Sarah O'Connor

@sarahoconnorft.ft.com

Investors are betting big bucks on the idea that AI will create an explosion of leisure time...e.g. it was a key part of the public rationale for the massive $55bn takeover of video games maker Electronic Arts. But are they right?? (short thread linked to my column today www.ft.com/content/4011...)

12 19 63

Reposted by Ian Bruff

8%

Scholar power: 8.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Ian Bruff	19%	20	8.5%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

58.0%

15.3 h

18

8.5%

Ranking score

0.028

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Nick Srnicek

@nsrnicek.bsky.social

Two big changes to the precarity of the AI industry in the last year: (1) more and more companies are turning to debt to finance AI capex (see Meta, xAI, Oracle), and (2) OpenAI's flurry of deals in the past month are tying major companies to the fate of this startup

2 18 29

by Woodrow Hartzog

27%

Scholar power: 27.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Woodrow Hartzog	20%	21	27.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

13.2 h

1

27.5%

Ranking score

0.026

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Woodrow Hartzog

@hartzog.bsky.social

AI continues to go just great (existential edition).

Eric Reinhart @eric-reinhart.com · 20h

This is an alarming compression of the planetary destruction timeline: with the massive growth of the AI bubble, data centers are expected to consume up to 12% of total US electricity by 2028, up from 4.4% in 2023.
www.cnn.com/2025/10/13/t...

Sora 2 and ChatGPT are consuming so much power that OpenAI just did another 10 gigawatt deal | CNN Business

OpenAI is partnering with Broadcom to design and develop 10 gigawatts of custom AI chips and systems, a massive amount of power that will use as much electricity as a large city. The move further high...

www.cnn.com

1 3

by Alex Callinicos

24%

Scholar power: 24.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Alex Callinicos	14%	33	24.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

9.1 h

0

24.1%

Ranking score

0.025

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Alex Callinicos

@alexcallinicos.bsky.social

Michael Roberts on the AI bubble and the US economy thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2025/10/14/t...

The AI bubble and the US economy

The US stock market continues to hit new record highs; the bitcoin price is also close to highs and the gold price has rocketed to all-time highs. Investors in financial assets (banks, insurance co…

thenextrecession.wordpress.com

1 1 3

by Julio Mayol

4%

Scholar power: 4.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Julio Mayol	3%	26	4.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

7.9 h

0

4.6%

Ranking score

0.017

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Justin Lewis

7%

Scholar power: 7.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Lewis	19%	16	7.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

7.2 h

4

7.6%

Ranking score

0.015

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Eddie Robson

@eddierobson.bsky.social

Even if AI can do it well, which I am not convinced of, I don't believe this has more than novelty value. Every example people come up with is a mash-up of existing things. People will get bored of that, they'll want to watch something new that they can talk to their friends about.

1 4 9

Reposted by Colin Murray

9%

Scholar power: 9.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Colin Murray	18%	25	9.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

6.2 h

0

9.0%

Ranking score

0.014

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Roland Smith

@rolandmcs.bsky.social

Well, it's certainly *artificial* intelligence.

11 7 41

by Federica Genovese

16%

Scholar power: 16.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Federica Genovese	16%	12	16.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

18.3 h

0

16.6%

Ranking score

0.011

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Federica Genovese

@fgenovese.bsky.social

“OpenAI has chosen not to disclose the carbon footprint of ChatGPT-5, its most advanced AI model to date. […] The company does not have formally announced climate or sustainability targets.

Altman has also expressed that he thinks artificial intelligence will solve climate change.”

😓🫠

1 1 6

Reposted by James O’Sullivan

3%

Scholar power: 3.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 30%, Political science 25%, Economics 20%, Law 15%, Communication & Media Studies 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 James O’Sullivan	10%	13	3.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

3.6 h

1

3.6%

Ranking score

0.011

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

S. Scott Graham

@sscottgraham.bsky.social

Just got falsely accused of using AI for something I worked hard on. Stop doing this! I know you think you can tell, but I promise you can't.

1 2