Jaakko Husa
banner
husajaakko.bsky.social
Jaakko Husa
@husajaakko.bsky.social

Professor. Comparative law/legal languages/legal history/constitutional studies/law & globalisation. Academic "humour". Posts indicate satire, perplexity or whatever. Opinions are my own, unfortunately.

https://ssrn.com/author=933550 .. more

Law 56%
Political science 37%

New issue of the Journal of Comparative Law (20:2) contains autobiographical essays of comparatists ("comparative lawyers"), including yours truly. Below you can see my essay's last page with some thoughts on the field and its future.

Sharing one of my, hopefully, entertaining comparative law memes on this platform.

"Codified Constitution is not a description of reality."

— Antero Jyränki
(my past friend and mentor)

Yours truly at a conference dinner.

Former F1 driver Kimi Räikkönen would know what to say to the Reviewer 2:

“Leave me alone, I know what I'm doing”
a man in a carrera uniform holds a bowl of popcorn in his right hand
Alt: Kimi Räikkönen eating popcorn
media.tenor.com

Seems like a "fine" specimen indeed. 🙄

Hart Publishing has now added a description of my book on their website.
www.bloomsbury.com/au/contraria...
Contrarian Jurists
This book presents a unique study of the field of comparative law examining the key differences between schools and approaches and examining their contradiction…
www.bloomsbury.com

We can learn thinking patterns from the US government. Here goes:

The claim "reptilian aliens have not replaced important people" is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that reptilian aliens have replaced important people.

F*cking brilliant, eh?

I started in June 1992 😬

I am not busy at all. In my ivory tower I just stay aloof, haughty, and unaware of ordinary problems of real people. So, I discuss abstract things with my learned colleagues, sip wine all day, and look down on everyone without PhD. Is that not what modern academia is about?

Perhaps it's just me but I find it weird and worrying that the White House press briefings look so North Korean.

I feel seen...
Me after every social interaction

A short PhD advice dialogue

PhDer: "Can you recommend a book about academia?"

Me: "Lord of the Flies."

PhDer: "Really?"

Me: "It focuses on a group of academics in a Faculty and their disastrous attempt to govern themselves."

Reposted by Jaakko Husa

Me after every social interaction

😬

During my years in academia I have learnt so much. For instance, academia taught me how to make nasty backhanded compliments.

Behold! I organised my office.

Would you apply for a professorship in the US now?

I thought so.

This is about Sweden but it works in the other Nordic countries too. share.google/onb3BQzENVlp...
Lillördag: Sweden's workers de-stress with 'Little Saturday'
As the weeks drag on and individual days lose meaning, embracing a Nordic tradition may give us reason to celebrate, just because.
share.google

Drinking day for the Nordics...

William Barbey has taken a dare of writing a review of "Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law" 3rd edn, edited by Smits, Husa, Valcke and Narciso (2023). No small feat because the encyclopedia consists of 1736 double-column pages.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
International law and women’s history: historical methods for egalitarian scholarship
Published in Comparative Legal History (Ahead of Print, 2025)
www.tandfonline.com

Wednesdays are like small Saturdays. Right?

That was the first phase, true. Reform's rise to power (if it really happens) may the the second. The second phase would mean hammering Brexit into the heads even of those who have nurtured hope.

Consider this. If Reform really is the next governing party in the UK, how might that affect the desire of foreign academics and students to come to the UK to work and study there?

You're doing just great. Pay no attention to those bitter losers.

Online now...

I started to get involved with comparative law/legal studies in the early 1990s. Moominpappa describes perfectly what my first 15 years were like:

"I knew nothing, but I believed a lot."

- The Exploits of Moominpappa

Me looking in kitchen cabinet: "No more Moomin mugs, this is enough!"

Also me: "Oih!"

It is clear that we do not like all that we have published. This presents a problem: how should a scholar think about their arguments with hindsight?

Orhan Pamuk has an interesting point:

"I don't judge my characters."

Perhaps we should treat past arguments as characters?