Joseph McGhee
banner
radlegaltakes.bsky.social
Joseph McGhee
@radlegaltakes.bsky.social
AuDHD Gen X’er with a passion for justice and a well-grinded axe. Relentlessly dedicated to government accountability and the rule of law. I like cats.

#Flagstaff #Arizona

Signal: @moroserabbit.34
Pinned
Many of you know me from #LawTwitter and #AppellateTwitter, but for those at #LawSky who do not, I am excited to connect!

Briefly, I’m the pro se plaintiff-appellant in a 9th Circuit appeal challenging the doctrines of § 1983 qualified & absolute immunity.

(1/7)
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
How strict can AZ cops interpret the law requiring motorists to stay right? Strict enough to let them pull someone over who is going just a hair below the speed of traffic - and then provide an excuse to ask to search the vehicle, all per AZ Supreme Court. tucson.com/news/state-r...
November 30, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
Here’s a hot take: I don’t want to see lawmakers posting holiday pictures from their mansions — I don’t care which party.

Keep that shit to yourself.
November 29, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
I'm regularly flabbergasted by this.

It's why those who understand the need to fight absolutely must.

www.techdirt.com/2025/11/26/o...
November 29, 2025 at 7:36 PM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
I think there are only like 3 law PhD programs here: Berkeley (jurisprudence and social policy), Yale, and University of Washington.

Does #lawsky know of any other law PhD programs here in the US?
November 29, 2025 at 5:01 PM
❤️
the peeps that keep this campaign staffer grounded. You better be nice!
November 26, 2025 at 5:49 AM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
A round of applause for the French is in order! 👏👏👏
November 24, 2025 at 6:56 PM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
May she rest in peace, and justice one day be done.
November 25, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
Hate, hate, hate it when apps pop-up with new AI features that only have options like "Get started!" and "Remind me later."

Don't remind me later. Never speak of this again.
November 25, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
Before Columbus sailed to the Americas, Old World police sprayed crowds with nutmeg.
November 25, 2025 at 7:25 AM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
I miss when Twitter was truly great like the time a guy got upset at someone calling out a cricket team and started explaining how bowling worked and at the end OP was like "thanks for explaining btw I hold the world record for most career outs in cricket history"
November 25, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
First Secretary of Defense you could defeat by painting a tunnel on the side of a boulder.
November 25, 2025 at 1:55 PM
I really like little old cats.
My sister in laws cat, Angel. Always been friendly and grumpy.
He's an old distinguished cat and I think he's in his twenty.
November 25, 2025 at 12:50 AM
This doesn’t apply in all instances, but I find it hilarious that lawyers think law is so hard that you can only learn it at law school.

You think law is so hard because it was hard for you, and you’re not all that smart.

Learning law is not hard. Have you ever tried college organic chemistry?
November 25, 2025 at 12:46 AM
🖕your little club. You don’t own the law—it belongs to every American.
Unless you’re the most skilled non-lawyer pro se ever (me) who is litigating three distinct landmark cases right now, including two on appeal before the Ninth Circuit.

Then IJ just plagiarizes your briefs and everyone else ignores you.

Lawyers and judges have the most fragile fucking egos.
November 25, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Doesn’t “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” under the 14th Amendment really just ultimately mean an individual liable to suit under common law?

Am I missing something? It seems certain factions really want to complicate this… Maybe I’m just an idiot.

#LawSky #LawTwitter #BirthrightCitizenship
November 23, 2025 at 11:54 PM
1. Basically everyone, including Trump, knows that on the video they say only that *illegal* orders can and should be disobeyed.

2. But Trump construes this as them “telling the military to disobey [his] orders.”

3. Ergo, Trump knowingly issues illegal orders to the military.
November 23, 2025 at 10:02 PM
You can’t beat me.

Yes, you: The one who thinks I don’t know they stalk my social media.

Not at law and not at life can you ever beat me. I could be homeless living in a tent in the woods and you’d still lose, because I’d still have my laptop.

🖕
November 23, 2025 at 8:09 PM
OMG this is *nasty*
At Ricky's - Original
open.spotify.com
November 23, 2025 at 7:47 PM
I’m the best appellate litigator I know. Which is not at all to say I only know crappy ones.

But it’s true. You’ll see.
November 23, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
You should definitely get Lindsey Halligan to indict them.
November 23, 2025 at 5:40 AM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
Zohran is clearly playing a character who rolled a 20 on their starting stats and put that into charisma. Then won the boss fight with a charisma check.
November 21, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
Under U.S. law:

A service member MUST disobey an unlawful order.

Obeying an unlawful order can itself be a crime.

This is not optional.

It is a legal duty.

🔊
November 21, 2025 at 11:26 PM
Reposted by Joseph McGhee
Y’all, the opinion and order of the Hon. Sara Ellis in Chicago Headline Club v. Noem granting the preliminary injunction is worth a read in its entirety. It’s 233 pages long, because that’s how many pages it took her to fully detail the Defendants’ misconduct.
storage.courtlistener.com
November 21, 2025 at 3:01 PM
I love baseball and also think this is really, really cool.
I just watched the first draft of women's professional baseball players in the US and I just think that's really, really cool.
November 21, 2025 at 5:55 PM