It's theoretically got another playthrough in it, using different characters, but I'm just not that enthused about doing that in long RPGs.
It's theoretically got another playthrough in it, using different characters, but I'm just not that enthused about doing that in long RPGs.
Now, if they fuck with elections, it'll look like Saddam shit instead of Xi or Putin shit. Laughably fake.
Now, if they fuck with elections, it'll look like Saddam shit instead of Xi or Putin shit. Laughably fake.
Game journalism is essentially dead, it's like two reader-supported part-timer websites and Gene fucking Park now, but instead of taking the victory lap you're just boxing shadows
Game journalism is essentially dead, it's like two reader-supported part-timer websites and Gene fucking Park now, but instead of taking the victory lap you're just boxing shadows
What you have to give up is the need to 100% everything, one reason why I like getting stuff on switch as there's no cheevos to put you in that mindset
What you have to give up is the need to 100% everything, one reason why I like getting stuff on switch as there's no cheevos to put you in that mindset
But they'll be able to throw this debacle in his idiot face for the next decade, so it works out in the end
But they'll be able to throw this debacle in his idiot face for the next decade, so it works out in the end
Second: if ya'll hardly slept for weeks doing this, then what exactly is AI solving here? 'Cause sounds like it'd be quicker, easier and better to just film it with actors. Plus you don't get the bad publicity.
Sounds like none of ya'll knew what the hell you were doing.
The studio behind it says they 'hardly slept' for several weeks while writing AI prompts and refining the shots — 'AI didn't make this film. We did'
Comments have been turned off on YouTube
Second: if ya'll hardly slept for weeks doing this, then what exactly is AI solving here? 'Cause sounds like it'd be quicker, easier and better to just film it with actors. Plus you don't get the bad publicity.
Sounds like none of ya'll knew what the hell you were doing.
And, yeah, Jillette felt like a dude who actually had opinions, not a thirst for clout or factional belonging. Wrong ones...but you can work with that.
And, yeah, Jillette felt like a dude who actually had opinions, not a thirst for clout or factional belonging. Wrong ones...but you can work with that.
So this is literally just Wow The Navy Is Fucked
And yeah building ships is hard, so work with the Koreans on that
The US can dominate everywhere in the world except 7000 miles away at an island 100 miles off another superpower’s coast.
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
So this is literally just Wow The Navy Is Fucked
And yeah building ships is hard, so work with the Koreans on that
They're studying remnants of a past apocalypse.
IOW, "Eschatology".
I feel for the localizers that had to kill that pun.
They're studying remnants of a past apocalypse.
IOW, "Eschatology".
I feel for the localizers that had to kill that pun.
Windows' problem is exactly like Xbox's: MS leadership only cares about genAI investors and Azure revenue. Every other part of the business is in service of that.
Windows' problem is exactly like Xbox's: MS leadership only cares about genAI investors and Azure revenue. Every other part of the business is in service of that.
Same lines, same assumptions, same weird bad faith, all of it
Same lines, same assumptions, same weird bad faith, all of it
🔭🐡🧪🎨
🔭🐡🧪🎨
I get that the PayPros thing is very much a power thing, but it is DISGUSTING how the AI companies are getting a pass like this. And I'm honestly wondering if this isn't a quiet tactic to make people friendlier to the slop.
I get that the PayPros thing is very much a power thing, but it is DISGUSTING how the AI companies are getting a pass like this. And I'm honestly wondering if this isn't a quiet tactic to make people friendlier to the slop.
Again if your stance is "media that I agree with & like should be protected from censorship" you are 100% in agreement with the censors, you're just quibbling on details
Again if your stance is "media that I agree with & like should be protected from censorship" you are 100% in agreement with the censors, you're just quibbling on details
The core idea is that they, like the President, supersede all law and are not bound by it.
The Supreme Court lacks the authority to change the text of the Constitution.
So either it affirms the text or (further, and more completely) nukes its authority as Constitutional arbiter.
There’s no third option. Art III (courts) can’t just usurp Art V (amendments).
The core idea is that they, like the President, supersede all law and are not bound by it.