“Es sei eventuell auch ein Fehler des Rektorats gewesen, die Anfrage an die Institute zur Beantwortung weiterzureichen.“ lol ja EVENTUELL

*hust*

bsky.app/profile/smit...

„Die taz sprach mit mehreren Mit­ar­bei­te­r*in­nen aus dem Mittelbau der Universität, die lieber anonym bleiben wollten. Eine Person sagte der taz: „Ich war schockiert über Kollegen, die Listen mit Namen und Projekten durchgegeben hatten“. 🤡🙃

taz.de/!6116589

New online: The Gay Liberation Front (GLF) collection is now available on LSE Digital Library! We’ve digitised and published the GLF Diaries and the GLF newspaper Come Together. Further series from the archives will be added as digitisation continues.
1/2
digital.library.lse.ac.uk/collections/...

Happy belated birthday. Lenny, thou shouldst be living at this hour.

I don't know how many times to point out that is absolutely ghoulish and non-consensual and disgusting behavior.
To exploit the image of a dead woman who was also exploited in real life so you can live out your momentary fantasies of "what is possible" with AI is bad science journalism, also.
Sick.

I was clearly talking about physical appearance

Me yesterday: why am I just sad and angry
Me today:

Got my period today so yes

And strive to become the top themselves (which they largely never will be)

The last line of Dr. Mittermeier’s post is the heart of the matter. It’s those who have a stable if not cushy existence who are most willing to do the work of the oligarchy. They see themselves sufficiently above the masses to imagine they are masters not merely agents.

Tbf a lot of our tourism is Nazi and Holocaust remembrance stuff that isn‘t always without its pitfalls but particularly attractions that Americans might visit love to stress the Hitler of it all

Getting a period, colorized

Honestly it‘s that dire rn, just thinking of the range from Four Weddings to The Mummy to Agents of SHIELD

I would watch John Hannah read the phone book but I may draw the line at Benidorm and ZDF (good on him for securing a steady paycheck tho)

click.email.variety.com?qs=8ac7dad5d...

How long ago?

Also the fact OP can just casually watch „Triumph of the Will“ again and I have never seen it except for stills because technically only adults can view it in Germany so we didn’t in school, and if it‘s shown publicly it has to be an academic / educational context, is maybe also telling you things.

no, this is calculated propaganda comprehensible to the audience of 1935

Yeah the fact you don‘t know may be the problem?

I also just laugh at AI slop of Trump as a king but MAGA diehards see that differently. Never mind that Riefenstahl became known for how she filmed Hitler and the crowds. And if that was filmically interesting by today‘s or 1930s standards is maybe beside the point - it sure gets referenced though.

Taking this clip out of context however tells you nothing about why even this bit worked as propaganda to its intended audience.
If I see a clip of Kansas fields it probably also does nothing to me but put it back in an ad of a Republican politician waxing poetic about protecting the homeland…

One final note in case you get all the way down here: it's worth noting that Rotten Tomatoes is owned by Fandango, which in turn is partly owned by Warner Bros Discovery, or whatever that company is called today, and partly owned by Versant, which is a spinoff of Comcast NBCUniversal. 30 Rock stuff

Seeing people nonchalantly post stuff like makes me feel like I'm going crazy honestly.

If publicists working rn don‘t know this idk I feel like me explaining these things to students that take media studies courses is maybe not as unimportant as some colleagues would have you believe