Nickolas Name (your favorite hybrid)
@nickolasname49.bsky.social
140 followers 210 following 630 posts
Keep track of you're grammer A jack-of-all-trades fella who does things. Supposedly a demon any/all (they/them prefered)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Nickolas Name (your favorite hybrid)
daveexmachina.bsky.social
normal person: i just want a place to hang out with my friends
tech weirdo: and shitheads
np: no just my friends
tw: but what about hearing alternative views on race and gender?
np: we just want to hang out and goof around
tw: so where do the shitheads fit in then
np: no shitheads
tw: not following
Reposted by Nickolas Name (your favorite hybrid)
adapalmer.bsky.social
I see pieces like this a lot, often w/ a spin of lamenting cultural degeneration, but reading is a LABOR issue, it’s declined because so many people are working overtime or two jobs & employers expect after hours work. France has Earth’s highest reading rate b/c long lunch breaks & labor protections
nickolasname49.bsky.social
Shouting "WAFFLES" has never changed anyone's mind either
jay.bsky.team
Harassing the mods into banning someone has never worked. And harassing people in general has never changed their mind.
nickolasname49.bsky.social
You know that horse-girl racing game that everyone's obsessed with as of late? I dislike it, I find all the posting around it annoying and it gives me weird vibes, and as a responsible person I can choose not to engage with the game or its fanbase. It's that simple.
nickolasname49.bsky.social
I'm fortunate enough to not have seem ppl with this mentality in a while, but in case you feel like you relate to centipede-guy even slightly, I wanna share a secret with you:

You can jsut dislike something. You need no permission and no reason to do so.
Reposted by Nickolas Name (your favorite hybrid)
jediofgallifrey.bsky.social
jay tried to open a nazi bar but her customers keep running them off and she's so fucking mad
Reposted by Nickolas Name (your favorite hybrid)
foxwife.bsky.social
not dooming about this because the fact they needed this grand display is a sign of how far their desires are from their abilities, but it is so fucking stupid and thoroughly embarassing that major institutional democratic voices are still like "we need to reach reasonable compromise 🤓"
atrupar.com
Trump: "The ones that are run by radical left Democrats -- what they've done to San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles. They're very unsafe places & we're gonna straighten them out one by one. This is gonna be a major part for some people in this room. That's a war too. It's war from within"
nickolasname49.bsky.social
I didn’t realise until now that, because I don’t care about blocking bot-like accounts that follow me but never interact with anything, I have over 100 followers
nickolasname49.bsky.social
Apparently if you search for ”antichrist” on DuckDuckGo you get a picture of Donald Trump
nickolasname49.bsky.social
Hard times make strong men

Strong men make me hard
Reposted by Nickolas Name (your favorite hybrid)
Reposted by Nickolas Name (your favorite hybrid)
sofnas.pmd.social
Grovyle portrait redraw
#pmd #pokemon #grovyle #explorer #explorersofsky #mundomisterioso #art #fanart
Reposted by Nickolas Name (your favorite hybrid)
vickyacab.bsky.social
The "terrorist reclassification" was an extreme over interpretation by Ken Klippenstein that circulated purely as a headline and is active disinfo, there are a whole gaggle of left/lib journalists right now who have found their niche getting massive engagement by scaring the shit out of trans people
nickolasname49.bsky.social
I don’t think that’s necessary, there’s already plenty of people pointing this out in the comments and reposts. Just wanted to spread da knowledge
nickolasname49.bsky.social
It isn’t even 20% who stopped being trans, it’s 2-4%. The 20% figure only makes sense if you count nonbinary people as cis, which is what The Economist did. bsky.app/profile/nick...
nickolasname49.bsky.social
Should be noted that the “one in five trans people change their mind” figure touted by this article counts “went from trans to gender diverse” as if it were “went from trans to cis.” If you want the number of people who actually went from trans to cis, that number is actually around 2-4%
nickolasname49.bsky.social
Even better, here’s the actual study they’re lying about for the article. The actual rate of “trans kids who canged their mind and are now cis” is around 2-4%, the economist just pumped it up by counting “gender diverse” people as if they were cis.

srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10....
Stability and Change in Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation Across Childhood and Adolescence
You have to enable JavaScript in your browser's settings in order to use the eReader.
srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
nickolasname49.bsky.social
If this article should teach you anything, it is that you should never trust a journalist to read a scientific paper for you, especially not if they’re from The Economist.
nickolasname49.bsky.social
In any case, the @economist.com’s reading of the study isn’t just misleading, it is journalistic malpractice. If you want to write an article about a study, you should actually read the study first, otherwise you are just writing fanfiction.

Shame on you.