Marcelius Braxton
@marceliusb.bsky.social
5.8K followers 810 following 960 posts
"Mar" "Sell" Us". Director of Center for Social Change, Associate Teaching Prof (Africana Studies, Philosophy, etc.), and Doctoral Candidate in Education. Former Law School Dean of Students, K-12 DEI admin, and cultural center director. *Views are my own*
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
marceliusb.bsky.social
Hey new followers,

I direct a Center for Social Change and Belonging, and I'm an Associate Teaching Prof in Philosophy, African/African American Studies, etc.

My work focuses on the intersections of race, law, education, and philosophy. I also focus on social justice, activism, and liberation.
Reposted by Marcelius Braxton
prisonculture.bsky.social
A lot of stuff is clearer when you recognize that a bunch of media people on socials are just trying to cheerlead for their friends and acquaintances. Nothing more and nothing less. It's very human.
marceliusb.bsky.social
Nope. Didn’t say that at all. You’re reading something into my words that I didn’t say at all.
marceliusb.bsky.social
I didn’t deflect from the question. If anything, you’re trying to shift away from my point. And she has shown much remorse at all, so I think a good start would be admitting she was wrong.
marceliusb.bsky.social
The point was that when pushed to be open to doing something about it, she dug in and refused. She had plenty of opportunity to share how her admin would be different. Instead she said more of the same and she wouldn’t change things. That was a big mistake on her end.
marceliusb.bsky.social
People have been protesting this administration all the time. That’s just a false statement to say people having been critiquing Trump and his admin.
marceliusb.bsky.social
Kamala Harris is being disingenuous with her comments. Much of the critique of her stance on Gaza was her unwillingness to divert from the admin she was part of. Even if she didn’t have decision making power, she made clear her stance was supporting her admin’s actions and she wouldn’t change/adapt.
marceliusb.bsky.social
You can't convince me that Obama saying "Israeli families" as opposed to "the people of Gaza" wasn't intentional and a reflection of his shift from being an advocate for Palestinian rights (engaging with scholars like Edward Said and Rashid Khalidi) to largely ignoring Palestine and favoring Israel.
marceliusb.bsky.social
Selective outrage: The York County shooting involved suspected stalking, gun violence, and killing police officers. Barely a word from major politicians because the shooter didn't fit their agenda. But ICE shooting can and will be used to push a political agenda. That's all most of them care about.
marceliusb.bsky.social
Sending you all the positive thoughts/vibes.
Reposted by Marcelius Braxton
karenattiah.bsky.social
Some news.
nytimes.com
Karen Attiah, a Washington Post opinion writer fired this month for her social media posts about the assassination of Charlie Kirk, has filed a grievance arguing that she should have been allowed to share her views on news events under the company’s labor agreement and social media policy.
Karen Attiah Says Firing by Washington Post Violated Labor Agreement
The company fired Karen Attiah this month for her social media posts related to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
nyti.ms
Reposted by Marcelius Braxton
prisonculture.bsky.social
Bothers me when people discuss Left movements in the U.S. w/out underscoring the GENERATIONS of repression, surveillance, violence directed at movements. The "Left" is so disorganized is used as a joke but I hardly ever see those same people saying 'THE LEFT WAS TARGETED & DISORGANIZED by the STATE'
marceliusb.bsky.social
Just a note that “Judeo-Christian” is a false construct, exclusionary, and a dog whistle. It’s also incongruent with theology and history. It is predominantly used to center Christianity under the guise of inclusivity. Just because someone uses the concept doesn’t mean you need to accept/adopt it.
marceliusb.bsky.social
In graduate school (for philosophy), there was often a specific tell that a bad, flawed, or biased argument was coming. It was when people would begin with things like “Consider a simple analogy” and then proceeded to use a bunch of words that try to sound smart without good arguments or accuracy.
katjathieme.bsky.social
What it sounds like when philosophers who are also anti-trans activists submit an amicus brief to a US court where they argue for banning trans girls and women from women's sports.
30
the option of interpreting the Idaho and West Virginia
statutes as motivated by the justified aim of excluding
all males from female sports, it is quite invidious to
interpret them as instead motivated by the unjustified
aim of excluding males who identify as female in par-
ticular.
Consider a simple analogy. Imagine that we are
back in Medieval Europe. Gold is the currency of the
land. Consequently, many merchants prefer to accept
gold and only gold as payment. However, a new move-
ment is afoot, whose members are known as the alche-
mists. The alchemists purport to have found a way of
turning iron pyrite (fool’s gold) into gold. Some people
are convinced by the claims of the alchemists, though
many others are not. This difference in attitudes
starts to lead to time-wasting interactions in which an
alchemist or fellow traveler tries to purchase a good
using iron pyrite from a merchant who, unmoved by
well-publicized insistence on the part of the alche-
mists that only irrational prejudice could lie behind
lingering doubts about the possibility of converting
iron pyrite into gold, continues to insist on only ac-
cepting gold as payment. One such merchant, whose
unofficial working policy has hitherto been to accept
only gold as payment, decides to make his policy offi-
cial by putting up a sign on his store saying, “Only
gold accepted (no iron pyrite!).”
marceliusb.bsky.social
In my AfAm course, only if they specifically say they were caught up in the rapture.

And yes I recognize this is probably a “Two Americas” moment, and I don’t care.
coreyryung.bsky.social
Question for profs: should an absence be excused if a student is raptured?
marceliusb.bsky.social
If you are a P4 college program and you consistently say yes to this hypothetical, time to fire the coach:

If the team swapped coaching staffs with the other side (exception if it’s an all-time great like Saban), would the team be much better and/or would the team the coach went to be much worse?
Reposted by Marcelius Braxton
chanda.blacksky.app
Karen Attiah made critical comments about *men who are white supremacists* and @washingtonpost.com said that they are a protected class

Be clear about what they were saying

That white supremacists are a protected class
marceliusb.bsky.social
The existence and conduct of ICE is also political violence.
marceliusb.bsky.social
Political violence can be both action and inaction.

It is funding billions in weapons that are used to commit genocide and starve children.

It is treating school shootings as inevitable and refusing to protect children.

Politicians condemn the individual act while supporting the collective ones.
marceliusb.bsky.social
I keep getting asked if I’m worried about my job because I often speak up about issues. The answer is no.

I’ve learned over the years that if employers want to hire you or if they want to fire you, they can always find a reason.

It’s not worth compromising your morals or values for anyone.
marceliusb.bsky.social
The fact that we have to endure so many spaces where people calling out racism, sexism, and homophobia face more consequences than the people actually being racist, sexist, and homophobic tells much of what you need to know about how far away we are from being a truly functional, equitable society.
Reposted by Marcelius Braxton
shengokai.blacksky.app
What we're seeing in the "don't sign up for protests" discourse is what Paulo Freire described as the convert's failure to trust the knowledge of the oppressed. As the convert tries to stand in solidarity with the oppressed, they refuse to let go of a world where they were the authority by default.
marceliusb.bsky.social
The Civil Rights era can be a valuable tool for understanding protest, grassroots and large scale organizing, communication, etc. However, to utilize it effectively requires examination, scrutinizing, and figuring out what still applies today and how. So many reference it without doing work needed.
marceliusb.bsky.social
You’re absolutely right AND the example given isn’t even “civil disobedience” as claimed.

bsky.app/profile/marc...
marceliusb.bsky.social
Civil disobedience is refusing to obey laws/demands/orders/commands of the gov. RSVPing to a protest and potentially being a target isn’t an example. It’s just a bad tactic. And telling targeted populations to become more of one without a clear long term vision or ways to protect them is a bad idea.
whstancil.bsky.social
Even if this was likely to happen (it isn’t) YES YOU SHOULD WANT TO MAKE THE FBI COME TALK TO YOU. Make them spend the time and resources, draw attention to their overreach!

Are people aware the entire nature of peaceful civil disobedience is forcing this kind of conflict?
marceliusb.bsky.social
Civil disobedience is refusing to obey laws/demands/orders/commands of the gov. RSVPing to a protest and potentially being a target isn’t an example. It’s just a bad tactic. And telling targeted populations to become more of one without a clear long term vision or ways to protect them is a bad idea.
whstancil.bsky.social
Even if this was likely to happen (it isn’t) YES YOU SHOULD WANT TO MAKE THE FBI COME TALK TO YOU. Make them spend the time and resources, draw attention to their overreach!

Are people aware the entire nature of peaceful civil disobedience is forcing this kind of conflict?
marceliusb.bsky.social
Primary them all. The messaging will happen (and is happening) no matter what! You honor people you admire or have esteem for. You can condemn murder without honoring him! If they’re worried about messages, worry about the one it sends to those they rely on for votes, who CK said awful things about.
andrewsolender.bsky.social
NEW: Expect some drama in House Dems’ meeting this AM over a vote to honor Charlie Kirk.

Some members undecided. Others voting no or “present.” But some in the party fear anything but a unanimous vote for it will be a messaging coup for the GOP.

@Axios.com
www.axios.com/2025/09/18/c...
House Democrats fume about vote to honor Charlie Kirk: "We're being totally set up"
The vote has been the topic of frenzied discussions in Democrats' closed-door meeting this week.
www.axios.com
marceliusb.bsky.social
Many in higher ed are showing us who they are. So, we should believe them.

They say “free speech” for racism/sexism/homophobia but now punish comments they see as “insensitive”, “disruptive”, etc.

And then give speeches or write op-eds decrying the lack of “free speech” or “viewpoint diversity”.