Marcelius Braxton
@marceliusb.bsky.social
"Mar" "Sell" Us". Director of Center for Social Change, Associate Teaching Prof (Africana Studies, Philosophy, etc.), and ABD in Education Doctorate. Former Law School Dean of Students, K-12 DEI admin, and cultural center director.
*Views are my own*
*Views are my own*
Nope. That’s absolutely not what I said.
November 23, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Nope. That’s absolutely not what I said.
Already addressed this: I know how the Homeland Security Act dismantled INS and split into three agencies: ICE, USCIS, and CBP. My argument is that the structure, focus, resources and power is different. Also I’m not arguing that immigration enforcement is new but I’m speaking of ICE as it is today.
November 23, 2025 at 12:38 AM
Already addressed this: I know how the Homeland Security Act dismantled INS and split into three agencies: ICE, USCIS, and CBP. My argument is that the structure, focus, resources and power is different. Also I’m not arguing that immigration enforcement is new but I’m speaking of ICE as it is today.
I assume they mean Greg Casar, the rep from Texas although I’m unclear what makes him post-liberal.
November 22, 2025 at 9:48 PM
I assume they mean Greg Casar, the rep from Texas although I’m unclear what makes him post-liberal.
In addition to ideas already stated, it will also be harder because of credibility/legitimacy, not with liberal lawyers but conservatives.
Many liberal lawyers, even though they disagree, treat the FedSoc as credible/legitimate in ways that many conservative lawyers won't, which gives FedSoc power.
Many liberal lawyers, even though they disagree, treat the FedSoc as credible/legitimate in ways that many conservative lawyers won't, which gives FedSoc power.
November 22, 2025 at 9:13 PM
In addition to ideas already stated, it will also be harder because of credibility/legitimacy, not with liberal lawyers but conservatives.
Many liberal lawyers, even though they disagree, treat the FedSoc as credible/legitimate in ways that many conservative lawyers won't, which gives FedSoc power.
Many liberal lawyers, even though they disagree, treat the FedSoc as credible/legitimate in ways that many conservative lawyers won't, which gives FedSoc power.
The biggest issue seems to be his messy use of "liberal" and what ideologies/philosophies he's attaching to liberal and/or liberalism. Also, it's unclear what he means by "post-liberal" and who that would even apply to.
November 22, 2025 at 7:40 PM
The biggest issue seems to be his messy use of "liberal" and what ideologies/philosophies he's attaching to liberal and/or liberalism. Also, it's unclear what he means by "post-liberal" and who that would even apply to.
I certainly didn’t but have a good day.
November 22, 2025 at 6:34 PM
I certainly didn’t but have a good day.
I think you’re not understanding or are
misinterpreting my argument. I’m well aware of the history of the country’s immigration policies and what they called “enforcement”.
misinterpreting my argument. I’m well aware of the history of the country’s immigration policies and what they called “enforcement”.
November 22, 2025 at 6:29 PM
I think you’re not understanding or are
misinterpreting my argument. I’m well aware of the history of the country’s immigration policies and what they called “enforcement”.
misinterpreting my argument. I’m well aware of the history of the country’s immigration policies and what they called “enforcement”.
I know the history and how the Homeland Security Act dismantled INS and split between three agencies: ICE, USCIS, and CBP. My argument is that the structure, focus, resources and power is different. Also I’m not arguing that immigration enforcement is new but I’m speaking of ICE as it is today.
November 22, 2025 at 6:28 PM
I know the history and how the Homeland Security Act dismantled INS and split between three agencies: ICE, USCIS, and CBP. My argument is that the structure, focus, resources and power is different. Also I’m not arguing that immigration enforcement is new but I’m speaking of ICE as it is today.
The INS wasn’t renamed ICE. The Homeland Security Act dismantled INS and split between three agencies: ICE, USCIS, and CBP. The structure, focus, and power given to ICE is different.
November 19, 2025 at 2:56 AM
The INS wasn’t renamed ICE. The Homeland Security Act dismantled INS and split between three agencies: ICE, USCIS, and CBP. The structure, focus, and power given to ICE is different.
To be honest, I think this is how it’ll be for a while. Everyone is going to think they can win because of NIL and what Indiana is doing, so we’re going to see a lot of teams fire their coaches after a short period or even after a year of success like Beamer just had.
November 15, 2025 at 8:20 PM
To be honest, I think this is how it’ll be for a while. Everyone is going to think they can win because of NIL and what Indiana is doing, so we’re going to see a lot of teams fire their coaches after a short period or even after a year of success like Beamer just had.
Best case scenario was him to finish out the season fairly strong then go to VT but now he’s either fired this year or likely next year. Next year they’re at Clemson, Alabama, Florida, and Oklahoma with UGA, A&M, and Tennessee at home. And I’m not sure they have a better team next year either.
November 15, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Best case scenario was him to finish out the season fairly strong then go to VT but now he’s either fired this year or likely next year. Next year they’re at Clemson, Alabama, Florida, and Oklahoma with UGA, A&M, and Tennessee at home. And I’m not sure they have a better team next year either.
No way Shane Beamer isn’t fired if South Carolina loses this game, right?
November 15, 2025 at 8:05 PM
No way Shane Beamer isn’t fired if South Carolina loses this game, right?
The specific case/argument and the merits. If conservatives want to overturn Obergefell, this would be a bad case to try to do so.
November 10, 2025 at 11:47 PM
The specific case/argument and the merits. If conservatives want to overturn Obergefell, this would be a bad case to try to do so.