Dan Seel
@danseel.bsky.social
750 followers 590 following 65 posts
Economic sociologist, PhD candidate, Wisconsin Badger, writing on: labor, elites, and power in the American South, also the transition debate. "Above this ridge, new peaks will rise" 🌹🍉🦡
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Everyone wants to streamline bureaucracy, but maybe we'd get better results by making it *harder* for university admins to chase fads. Imagine the money we'd save with a mandatory cooling-off period before launching a "Center for Blockchain Studies" or dumping millions into the latest edtech toy.
In about three years the entire university pivot to AI curricula and schools and programs is going to be so deeply embarrassing. We will all pretend it never happened and I will be standing there, looking at people with a mirror in my eyes. This is all so embarrassing.
Reposted by Dan Seel
"when people say that it is the job of college professors to keep students engaged but that we can also not ban devices, I want to sigh performatively—how, exactly, am I supposed to keep them hooked when Hollywood can’t keep them hooked?" musgrave.substack.com/p/a-post-lit...
A Post-Literate Society is a Too-Literal Society
Directness is a virtue and subtlety is lost
musgrave.substack.com
Reposted by Dan Seel
This may just be the best CS paper I’ve read this year. Just read the abstract and first para of the intro! The rest of the intro is really wild too, but very very good:

dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1...
Reposted by Dan Seel
NEW -

Inflation and Incumbent Support: Experimental Evidence from the 2024 US Presidential Election - https://cup.org/3JaiZYj

"priming Americans to think about inflation reduced support for the incumbent party"

- Selim Erdem Aytaç, @danielmcdowell.bsky.social & David A. Steinberg

#OpenAccess
Reposted by Dan Seel
Does a new generation of social scientists have to publish more to achieve less? (from 2019)
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci... Intuition says "yes", and so says data for sociology.
Reposted by Dan Seel
Again, it is worth keeping in mind when comparing the rate of discoveries that public funding for medicine and the sciences is orders of magnitude larger than for the humanities. We work slow in part because we work on a shoestring.
I wish you had pushed more here, because that's not what either footage or reporting from the ground shows, quite the opposite...
Reposted by Dan Seel
damn. hoping it at least signifies something
It is a tale
Told by an idiot
ouch, do you have a link?
one of the minor frustrations of the 2020s internet is how many sites now don't respect boolean commands in search, like they'd rather give you a bunch of unrelated content to sift through than turn up only a handful of results
Reposted by Dan Seel
I have a piece out today comparing the current ARG bailout to MX 1994 (quite different); ECB behavior in 2010s (closer as it targets voters); current BZ tariffs (ding-ding-ding--it's a market intervention that's also an intervention in domestic politics).
www.barrons.com/articles/arg...
Argentina Gets a Bailout, Brazil Gets the Stick. What Unites Them.
The Trump administration’s judgements are rooted in political style, Karthik Sankaran writes in a guest commentary.
www.barrons.com
Hey, now he can be M: Son of the (21st) century
if I had a nickel for every time a "factory [that] went overseas" actually went to the South, I'd probably be able to self-fund my dissertation.
To pick a random transportation project, the $60bn in metaverse investment would've covered a decent chunk of the funding gap for road and bridge maintenance
www.pew.org/en/research-...
Since the omerta on criticizing LLM infra investment appears to be breaking can we go back and maybe, acknowledge that there were some indicators that these guys have long been pretty cavalier about throwing money into the void? Money that could have been better spent on actual infrastructure?
I feel like the entire ~15min opening doom and gloom sequence should be so much more iconic than it is, what a stylistic masterpiece
Just thinking out loud here but if (tacit) coordination in a specific sector is feasible, firms probably won't quickly revert to pre-tariff pricing, particularly if they previously ate the cost and squeezed margins to avoid passing through the full tariff burden to consumers.
I'm guessing, after a hypothetical tariff rollback that positional goods, goods with complex supply chains either hit by tariffs or reconfigured in response to tariffs, and goods with higher inventories already in the US will likely take longer to adjust than, eg, textiles or foodstuffs
so assuming 1. the floodgates break on tariff passthroughs 2. a future administration repeals most or all of them, has there been any modelling on which prices are likely to be stickier than others? my intuition is that some industries will probably try to hold the line on higher prices for a bit
If I'm being charitable then yes, we could say that the politics of the South and the politics of the rest of the US are more similar now, but not in the way the author thought it would happen. Southernization is still underrated as a driver of 21st century political change.
the book is "Perspectives on the American South" (1985) and it has some interesting and prescient observations but uh, predicting the rise of a firmly class based Democratic party and a post-racial US is not one of them.
Came upon some predictions from a southern studies edited volume from 1985 and man, what a swing and a miss there
Make him the night mayor and let him wander around introducing himself to tourists. I dunno if he's captured the spirit of NYC but he's captured something...
Any sense on why there hasn't been a big archive digitization push? It's hard to think of a bigger trove of text data left aside from the millions of boxes sitting at archives and historical societies, if one can stomach the cost/time/annoyance of assembling the researchers to do the scanning