- Harris dominated younger voters, AOC was steady, but a clear second choice (is that name rec?)
- Newsom does best among older Dems
- Harris does worse as education increases
3959436.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/395943...
- Harris dominated younger voters, AOC was steady, but a clear second choice (is that name rec?)
- Newsom does best among older Dems
- Harris does worse as education increases
3959436.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/395943...
35% would be a tad better than Bernie 2020, but worse than Bernie 2016.
Harris and AOC have the most supporter overlap. For Harris that’s mostly name rec, as you go up in engagement
35% would be a tad better than Bernie 2020, but worse than Bernie 2016.
First choice: Harris 39%, Newsom 21%, AOC 10%, Pete and Shapiro 7%
But the most interesting part is the RCV
First choice: Harris 39%, Newsom 21%, AOC 10%, Pete and Shapiro 7%
But the most interesting part is the RCV
www.focaldata.com/blog/cost-of...
www.focaldata.com/blog/cost-of...
House of Representatives congressional vote
All adults
🔵 Democrats: 42%
🔴 Republicans: 38%
Registered voters
🔵 Democrats: 46%
🔴 Republicans: 42%
Likely voters
🔵 Democrats: 51%
🔴 Republicans: 44%
www.focaldata.com/blog/cost-of...
1. Michigan
2. Maine
3. Ohio
4. Wisconsin
5. Minnesota
6. Pennsylvania
7. Montana
8. Kentucky
9. Indiana
10. New Hampshire
1. Michigan
2. Maine
3. Ohio
4. Wisconsin
5. Minnesota
6. Pennsylvania
7. Montana
8. Kentucky
9. Indiana
10. New Hampshire
Very suspicious drop in oil rig counts right after April 2025. Correlation, not causation, but…insane how many charts are showing this
Very suspicious drop in oil rig counts right after April 2025. Correlation, not causation, but…insane how many charts are showing this
Also, progs doing well in primaries for 2026 is a bit of a pre-requisite.
And maybe voters in the primary electorate won’t care. But that is a big if.
Also, progs doing well in primaries for 2026 is a bit of a pre-requisite.
And maybe voters in the primary electorate won’t care. But that is a big if.
And maybe voters in the primary electorate won’t care. But that is a big if.
Latimer voted no on Laken Riley
Latimer voted no on Laken Riley
Doing great folks, just great.
(having these thoughts at 2 AM ET is not healthy, idea stolen from @jhweissmann.bsky.social on the other site)
(having these thoughts at 2 AM ET is not healthy, idea stolen from @jhweissmann.bsky.social on the other site)
(having these thoughts at 2 AM ET is not healthy, idea stolen from @jhweissmann.bsky.social on the other site)
(having these thoughts at 2 AM ET is not healthy, idea stolen from @jhweissmann.bsky.social on the other site)
LINK: discord.gg/5h5GjNVrQw
LINK: discord.gg/5h5GjNVrQw
In 2008, 11 of 12 were revised down but in 2010 11 of 12 were revised up
Directionality does tend to happen when there’s some underlying economic “event” happening, whether recovery or turmoil
Prob made worse by doge cuts
In 2008, 11 of 12 were revised down but in 2010 11 of 12 were revised up
Directionality does tend to happen when there’s some underlying economic “event” happening, whether recovery or turmoil
Prob made worse by doge cuts
(And it’s not fake, funnily enough.)