Yamil Ricardo Velez
banner
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
Yamil Ricardo Velez
@yamilrvelez.bsky.social

political scientist at Columbia | MIA ✈️ NYC | tailored surveys and experiments

Political science 41%
Sociology 29%

Thanks, Dan!

Reposted by Yamil Velez

An AI Voter bot improves knowledge about politics
But, the AI bot has weak effects on downstream outcomes like vote preferences and party evaluations among respondents whose primary issue position aligns closely with one of the parties.
Partisan action is hard to change.
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

Though LLMs as persuasion tools are (rightly) getting attention, their most valuable civic use may be retrieval: grounded answers with links to the source material using language that is accessible to users. Positive use cases aren’t dominating the discourse, but that’s where I think the upside is.

In ongoing work w/ Alec Ewig, we explore how RAG can enhance measures of representation by retrieving relevant legislation from a 15,000+ bill database mapped to voter preferences. RAG + agentic workflows can uncover info buried in dense policy docs and answer complex queries with citations.
www.dropbox.com

We used retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), a method that pulls relevant text from curated sources directly into prompts. A vector database, multiple API calls, and a lot of trial and error later, it substantially reduced errors and preserved issue-specific language from party platforms.

When we started this project, standard LLMs weren't up to the task. They produced plausible-sounding answers but regularly hallucinated policy stances, especially on niche or novel issues. For a voting advice application, accuracy was critical, so we had to build a more involved approach.
This paper was a blast to work on. The challenge: present party positions across many issues, in real time, using language voters actually use. 🧵 on why we went with a more involved retrieval-based approach and where I think these tools are headed.
🚨Excited to share our new paper published in PNAS (joint with @yamilrvelez.bsky.social and Don Green)! AI can enhance political knowledge and provide balanced information about politics with proper guardrails and vetted sources (e.g., party platforms).

www.pnas.org/doi/full/10....

Congrats, Damien!
🚨Excited to share our new paper published in PNAS (joint with @yamilrvelez.bsky.social and Don Green)! AI can enhance political knowledge and provide balanced information about politics with proper guardrails and vetted sources (e.g., party platforms).

www.pnas.org/doi/full/10....

I have a 2024 pre-election Verasight survey I carried out with Alec Ewig that used an adaptive survey method to create a kind of dynamic CES. Happy to chat offline if you think it would be useful!

Reposted by Yamil Velez

Looking for a tl;dr for these two excellent papers? I've got you covered: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
🚨 New in Nature+Science!🚨
AI chatbots can shift voter attitudes on candidates & policies, often by 10+pp
🔹Exps in US Canada Poland & UK
🔹More “facts”→more persuasion (not psych tricks)
🔹Increasing persuasiveness reduces "fact" accuracy
🔹Right-leaning bots=more inaccurate

All of this is to say that I hope I’m also invited to the party, not only because I care about identifying causal effects, but because I also care about measuring theoretical constructs with a level of precision that quasi-experimental and field experimental designs simply can’t deliver.

As we increasingly interact with GUIs via LLMs, targeted ads, and social media, survey experiments are *even more* fit for the task of understanding human behavior, and I hope we continue relying on them to sort through thorny causal questions.

That’s a useful distinction. Another way to put it is whether a treatment *intervenes* on an outcome. On its face, your standard persuasion experiment looks a lot like “do you prefer [Joe/Jose] for this job?,” but the latter design isn’t trying to shift Y. It’s a measurement exercise.

It's likely not a problem *yet*

Thanks for flagging! I know Brave has several privacy layers. Will look into it.

Thanks! Have to channel my existential panic into something!

Surveys are going to need new ways to establish human presence as AI gets faster and harder to detect. Pulse is one step in that direction.

Special thanks to @seanwestwood1.bsky.social who flagged several spoofing paths. This is exactly the kind of scrutiny we’ll need as we adapt to this new era.

This doesn’t solve the “verify-then-handoff” problem. But it does filter out the most aggressive headless-browser attacks and gives us a first layer of defense in an era where attention checks and gotcha questions fail.

Demo and QSF download here: columbiauniversity.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_...
Qualtrics Survey | Qualtrics Experience Management
The most powerful, simple and trusted way to gather experience data. Start your journey to experience management and try a free account today.
columbiauniversity.qualtrics.com

I'm currently working on Pulse, a “proof-of-life” approach compatible with Qualtrics that uses a simple finger-on-lens verification task to confirm human presence. This approach avoids privacy concerns tied to capturing faces or living environments, and it works on laptops and smartphones.
As @seanjwestwood.bsky.social's terrifying new PNAS article demonstrates, LLMs can now pass almost every attention check, mirror personas, stay consistent across pages, and systematically bias responses in the aggregate.

So here’s a different angle: verify physical presence, not text.

Reposted by Yamil Velez

I used to believe that survey aesthetics have minimal effects on completion rates and attentiveness… until I saw that slime-green color scheme
Ever stared at a table of regression coefficients & wondered what you're doing with your life?

Very excited to share this gentle introduction to another way of making sense of statistical models (w @vincentab.bsky.social)
Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf...
Website: j-rohrer.github.io/marginal-psy...
Today, @catiebailard.bsky.social and I take the reins at GW's Institute for Data, Democracy + Politics! We'll work to make IDDP a one-stop shop for research on misinfo, platform manipulation, and threats to democratic ideals. To follow our work + learn about opportunities, visit: bit.ly/45GLggi
Sign up
signup.e2ma.net

Reposted by Yamil Velez

Thrilled to see my paper with Patrick Liu in the APSR!

We address a crucial question in political psychology — whether persuasive attempts targeting deeply held issues cause attitudes to grow more extreme or encourage moderation — using tailored AI-powered surveys.
Confronting Core Issues: A Critical Assessment of Attitude Polarization Using Tailored Experiments | American Political Science Review | Cambridge Core
Confronting Core Issues: A Critical Assessment of Attitude Polarization Using Tailored Experiments
www.cambridge.org

Reposted by Yamil Velez

#OpenAccess from @polanalysis.bsky.social -

Crowdsourced Adaptive Surveys - cup.org/4aY2OH4

- @yamilrvelez.bsky.social

"This paper introduces a crowdsourced adaptive survey methodology (CSAS) that unites advances in natural language processing and adaptive algorithms..."

#FirstView

Reposted by Yamil Velez

@yamilrvelez.bsky.social from @columbiauniversity.bsky.social opened the second week of SICSS-Penn 2025 with his talk, "Generative AI and Respondent-Centered Social Science."