Scholar

Maya Sen

H-index: 27
Economics 33%
Law 32%
mayasen.bsky.social
free messaging strategy as voting rights supporters regroup from today's oral args:

based on public opinion work I've done, most people do not like things that look like racial quotas, but they strongly support nationally representative governing institutions

by Maya SenReposted by Karen Benjamin Guzzo

mayasen.bsky.social
Aside from losing many Democratic seats, Black representation in Congress will probably drop from around 14% of seats (nationally representative) to maybe 7 or 8% (not representative)?

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/15/u...
The Supreme Court Case That Could Hand the House to Republicans
www.nytimes.com
mayasen.bsky.social
some variant of: "we cannot reconcile why race may not be used in university admissions but it can be used in the drawing of congressional district boundaries"

despite the very different legal justifications for the use of race in the latter context

by Maya SenReposted by David Darmofal

mayasen.bsky.social
will also pre-register this purely political observation - which is that the conservative justices will employ SFA v. Harvard style reasoning to strike down the relevant portions of Sec 2 of the VRA
mayasen.bsky.social
have said this before but they're headed toward applying affirmative action reasoning with the construction of majority-minority districts

by Maya SenReposted by David Darmofal

mayasen.bsky.social
have said this before but they're headed toward applying affirmative action reasoning with the construction of majority-minority districts
mayasen.bsky.social
always nice to know what my colleagues are up to!
jamalgreene.bsky.social
Justice Kavanaugh in the Callais oral argument keeps alluding to some longstanding requirement of strict scrutiny that use of race have a time limit. This is invented.
mayasen.bsky.social
Looking forward to John Roberts concluding that majority-minority districts are longer necessary because there are a lot of African Americans in Congress

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/15/u...
Will the Voting Rights Act Be Gutted? Supreme Court Could Decide Its Future.
www.nytimes.com
mayasen.bsky.social
the transcript doesn’t do it justice

by Maya SenReposted by Joshua Goodman

mayasen.bsky.social
“Less qualified than an economist?” is legitimately a very funny response to someone calling RFK Jr unqualified
mayasen.bsky.social
Thank you. It’s not that huge of a deal but I’m very happy to be moving in this direction at this stage of my career.

by Maya SenReposted by Jane E. Fountain

mayasen.bsky.social
Happy to share that I’m now officially an affiliated faculty at Harvard Law School

Firmly believe law is where the most important conversations are happening, and am looking forward to building connections between law, policy, and politics. Thanks to those who helped make this happen!
mayasen.bsky.social
Otoh I have never once looked back at a letter I didn’t sign and say “boy I wish I had signed that!”
mayasen.bsky.social
As they say “I wish her luck in her future endeavors” since she does seem to be auditioning for something!
mayasen.bsky.social
It's not about her being really conservative (that's fine). It's just not a good piece.
mayasen.bsky.social
I think a problem with the piece is that universities needing to defend principles "even when doing so is inconvenient or costly" seems pretty unrelated to the issue of conservative speakers getting a cooler reception than they'd like

in fact, I can think of several better current examples...
mayasen.bsky.social
to say that the "point of her story" is that universities have to "guarantee forums to explore a diversity of ideas safely and openly" is such a non sequitur that I have to assume that she's auditioning for a conservative outlet somewhere
mayasen.bsky.social
Essay was a huge miss for me

Imagine still thinking woke university students are the real problem…if only!
mayasen.bsky.social
He has tried strategic maneuvering before on contentious issues where the Court’s legitimacy may be at stake (ACA, Dobbs)
mayasen.bsky.social
** Stares out the window thinking of Trump v US **
mayasen.bsky.social
I’ve said elsewhere that I am holding out some hope that Roberts and maybe one other conservative (I guess ACB) are playing a strategic long game and will in the end act to curb unconstitutional executive overreach

But man….
mayasen.bsky.social
And one of the few substantive “analyses,” the Kavanaugh concurrence from Noem v. Perdomo, points to the latter
mayasen.bsky.social
Firmly believe this & fears of immediate executive defiance are a consideration for some of the conservative justices

The problem is that this observationally indistinguishable from substantive policy agreement with the Trump agenda
atrupar.com
Amy Coney Barrett defends heavy use of the shadow docket: "If we wrote a long opinion, it might give the impression that we have finally resolved the issue, and in none of these cases have we finally resolved the issue."
atrupar.com
Amy Coney Barrett defends heavy use of the shadow docket: "If we wrote a long opinion, it might give the impression that we have finally resolved the issue, and in none of these cases have we finally resolved the issue."

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m