Trump threatens tariffs, Beijing retaliates

by Justin Wolfers Reposted by James S. Shortle

Scholar power: 132.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Wolfers	47%	58	107.4%
🎓 James S. Shortle	40%	40	25.3%
Total			132.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

57.0%

9.3 h

134

132.7%

Ranking score

1.253

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Jože P. Damijan

24%

Scholar power: 24.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jože P. Damijan	47%	28	24.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

3.6 h

540

24.9%

Ranking score

0.801

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Mohamed A. El‐Erian

58%

Scholar power: 58.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mohamed A. El‐Erian	50%	15	58.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

61.0%

2.3 h

20

58.1%

Ranking score

0.703

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mohamed A. El-Erian

@elerianm.bsky.social

President Trump on the rising trade tensions with China:

#economy #markets #trade #tariffs #china

19 4 39

by Justin Wolfers

107%

Scholar power: 107.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Wolfers	47%	58	107.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

4.2 h

156

107.4%

Ranking score

1.187

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Justin Wolfers

@justinwolfers.bsky.social

The Trump-China trade relationship reminds me of my middle school love life: On one week, off the week, high drama, passing notes, heartache, renewal, gossip, and we did it all again the next week.

The reality, of course, is that despite the drama, no-one was making long-term commitments.

18 88 330

by Harald Oberhofer

62%

Scholar power: 62.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Harald Oberhofer	52%	16	62.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

59.0%

2.8 h

3

62.4%

Ranking score

0.43

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Harald Oberhofer

@ho2604.bsky.social

Groundhog Day.

orf.at/stories/3408...

Handelsstreit: China droht USA mit Gegenmaßnahmen

Im Handelsstreit zwischen den USA und China haben sich die Fronten zwischen den beiden größten Volkswirtschaften der Welt deutlich verhärtet. Nach der Ankündigung von US-Präsident Donald Trump, weiter...

orf.at

8

by Ian Bremmer

31%

Scholar power: 31.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Ian Bremmer	22%	23	31.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

3.9 h

172

31.7%

Ranking score

0.389

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Justin Wolfers

107%

Scholar power: 107.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Wolfers	47%	58	107.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

59.0%

9.3 h

172

107.4%

Ranking score

1.069

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Justin Wolfers

@justinwolfers.bsky.social

There's a decent chance that the Supremes will strike down Trump’s extra special brand new 100% China tariff, as unconstitutional. And so it's doubly notable how much markets panicked, given the (roughly) 50% chance it won’t happen. The market drop understates the damage Trump's trying to inflict.

22 120 430

Reposted by Will Jennings

12%

Scholar power: 12.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Will Jennings	18%	51	12.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

2.3 h

128

12.9%

Ranking score

0.254

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Matt Novak

@paleofuture.bsky.social

“Don't worry about China, it will all be fine! Highly respected President Xi just had a bad moment.”

24 18 120

Reposted by Nicola Giocoli

19%

Scholar power: 19.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Nicola Giocoli	55%	12	19.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

59.0%

22.7 h

2931

19.1%

Ranking score

0.243

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Justin Wolfers

107%

Scholar power: 107.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Wolfers	47%	58	107.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

4.4 h

218

107.4%

Ranking score

0.961

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Michael McFaul

27%

Scholar power: 27.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Michael McFaul	15%	36	27.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

8.0 h

184

27.0%

Ranking score

0.2

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Oliver Stuenkel

40%

Scholar power: 40.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Oliver Stuenkel	30%	20	40.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

66.0%

5.7 h

16

40.2%

Ranking score

0.191

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Jože P. Damijan

24%

Scholar power: 24.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jože P. Damijan	47%	28	24.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

23.3 h

1562

24.9%

Ranking score

0.134

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Dimitry Kochenov

9%

Scholar power: 9.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Dimitry Kochenov	16%	36	9.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

14.3 h

2055

9.6%

Ranking score

0.118

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by C. Christine Fair

11%

Scholar power: 11.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 C. Christine Fair	19%	35	11.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

6.5 h

264

11.2%

Ranking score

0.102

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Luis Enrique Otero Carvajal

3%

Scholar power: 3.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Luis Enrique Otero Carvajal	11%	8	3.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

100.0%

13.4 h

2

3.1%

Ranking score

0.086

Formula for ranking score (article): scholar_power × max(3 × (total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_published, 1))

El Pais

China's restrictions on rare earths put the tariff war with Trump back to square one

The U.S. president threatens additional 100% tariffs. Beijing says the impact of its measures is 'limited' and warns that it does not fear a trade confrontation

Reposts 2 13h

Reposted by Henry Farrell, Joanna Bryson

13%

Scholar power: 13.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Henry Farrell	22%	33	12.6%
🎓 Joanna Bryson	1%	32	0.6%
Total			13.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

3.6 h

8

13.2%

Ranking score

0.08

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Gerard DiPippo

@gdp1985.bsky.social

Over the past few years, Beijing has been mirroring the U.S. economic-security toolkit. China is developing its own architecture to manage risk, preserve chokepoints, and respond in kind. It's also learning from the United States.

1 8 17

Reposted by David R. Miller

4%

Scholar power: 4.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 David R. Miller	9%	21	4.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

6.2 h

742

4.1%

Ranking score

0.053

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Ron Filipkowski

@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social

That is different from what the admin said. They claimed it was coming out of DOD R&D funds. Tariff money cannot be touched by the Trump Regime without congressional approval.

210 760 2.4K

by Anand Menon

33%

Scholar power: 33.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 50%, Political science 25%, Business 15%, Law 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Anand Menon	21%	29	33.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

13.4 h

10

33.9%

Ranking score

0.049

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Anand Menon

@anandmenon.bsky.social

To date, Starmer has been hugely effective at reconciling closer links with China, 'reset' with the EU and a good relationship with Trump. That balancing act is only going to get harder. www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...