sekharn
banner
sekharn.bsky.social
sekharn
@sekharn.bsky.social
Bay Area Dad, Cal Alum #GoBears, Sports Fan, Electrical Engineer/Circuit Designer by training, he/him
Reposted by sekharn
Andrew Johnson illegally fired Edwin Stanton on Feb 21, 1868. The House voted, in a one-sentence resolution, to impeach him on Feb 24. The actual articles were adopted March 2-3. The Senate trial began on March 4.

Twelve days from the offense itself to facing trial for it.
WELKER: Massie and Khanna say they are looking at options including impeachment and contempt for DOJ officials. Would you support those steps?

KAINE: I think that's premature
December 22, 2025 at 5:03 AM
Reposted by sekharn
In case you need to hear it from someone who was raised Hindu: Usha is not a hostage, she is an accomplice. She is culpable. Fuck her and the fascists she colludes with. May she go down with all of them. As Zohran ably demonstrates, our communities do not aspire to whiteness & don’t seek to appease.
Vance's latest rant has set off another misguided round of "free Usha" rhetoric. This isn't just inaccurate--she's wholly a part of this fascist project--it's dangerous. We can no longer afford to imagine fascism as smaller than it is. Hindu fascism is vast, too. No religion is immune.
December 22, 2025 at 4:53 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Above I said "no religion is immune to fascism." This is *not* an anti-religion statement, and I've as little time for that kind of flat and essentialist thinking as I do for Christian or Hindu nationalism. Fascism is like a black hole: it exerts a terrible gravity on all things.
December 22, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Reposted by sekharn
The liberal imagination that Usha Vance must somehow not be a part of the fascist project to which she gives her energies is yet another facet of white supremacy & Christian nationalism the very racial & religious essentialism on which they thrive.
December 22, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Vance's latest rant has set off another misguided round of "free Usha" rhetoric. This isn't just inaccurate--she's wholly a part of this fascist project--it's dangerous. We can no longer afford to imagine fascism as smaller than it is. Hindu fascism is vast, too. No religion is immune.
December 22, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Reposted by sekharn
I think it’s pretty likely Bari Weiss quits far sooner than anyone expects because if there’s anything we learned from her tenure at the New York Times it’s that this lady hates working, absolutely despises it, and she probably had to send like four emails today
December 22, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Reposted by sekharn
So Bari Weiss’s first real editorial intervention at CBS is to repress coverage of American concentration camps.
December 22, 2025 at 3:05 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Bari only pulled this program after the promos started airing, which means she probably got a phone call. So she's not just bad at her ostensible job of running CBS news, but she's also bad at her *actual* job of running interference for the Trump admin
CBS News EIC Bari Weiss had concerns about the CECOT piece, I’m told. The network decided to hold the segment pending, among other things, comment or an interview with White House officials next year…
An Editor’s Note from 60 Minutes
December 22, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Ethical question: You come across a delivery robot stopped indefinitely in the middle of a narrow sidewalk with a tree strip, blocking the way so that it might difficult for a person using a wheelchair to pass. Behavior like that by a human would be considered antisocial. What do you do?
Drivers get multiple wide lanes to move and store their vehicles while everyone else has to fight for effectively five feet of sidewalk space #ClarkStCorridor
December 22, 2025 at 3:52 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Censoring a story about the outsourced regime gulag is not consistent with freedom of speech. But it is consistent with the belief that “free speech” is when conservatives can say what they want and when you can say what they want.
December 22, 2025 at 3:08 AM
Reposted by sekharn
They were never defending freedom of speech. They were defending a right to monologue. The former cannot coexist with the latter.
December 22, 2025 at 3:03 AM
Reposted by sekharn
i think she probably sincerely believes an investigative team at 60 minutes would have a difficult time getting in touch with stephen miller, or that they haven't thought about the language they're using
December 22, 2025 at 3:34 AM
Reposted by sekharn
it's not that you have to be stupid to be an effective regime mouthpiece, but it certainly helps bari weiss that she has a wind tunnel between her ears www.nytimes.com/2025/12/21/b...
December 22, 2025 at 3:33 AM
Reposted by sekharn
“These men risked their lives to speak with us. We have a moral and professional obligation to the sources who entrusted us with their
stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless.”
Per NY Times’s Michael Grynbaum on X, this is Sharyn Alfonsi’s email to her “60 Minutes” colleagues in full:
December 22, 2025 at 3:42 AM
Reposted by sekharn
The story is insane. The acting head of cyber security, a Noem crony, repeatedly demanded to see highly classified information he didn’t need access to, and when staff set up a lie detector test as a condition to grant him access, he failed it. So DHS suspended the staffers.
December 22, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Reposted by sekharn
the shitstorm that’s already brewing because of Bari’s decision to spike this story is going to end up being vastly more damaging to her and to the admin than allowing the story to air would have been

she’s an evil propagandist hack but she is also very bad at doing it in a way that isn’t hamfisted
December 22, 2025 at 3:04 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Here’s a gift link to this stunner Washpost story, quoting the 60 Minutes correspondent on the CECOT story, who accuses Bari Weiss of spiking the piece all because the Trump Administration wouldn’t comment.

“Government silence is a statement, not a VETO.”

wapo.st/3YL4T3D
‘60 Minutes’ correspondent says CBS’s Bari Weiss abruptly pulled segment on Trump deportations
CBS News pulled a ‘60 Minutes’ segment about a prison in El Salvador one day before it was set to air because the Trump administration declined to participate.
wapo.st
December 22, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Reposted by sekharn
And there it is...
December 22, 2025 at 2:55 AM
Reposted by sekharn
the idea that weiss had journalistic concerns is belied by the fact that she's not a journalist
December 22, 2025 at 2:49 AM
Reposted by sekharn
she's just doing what she was hired to do
Why would you need to put a pause on a story that has been meticulously fact-checked and lawyered?

Sounds like the kind of story you’d want to run right away!
December 22, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Bari Weiss doing her best to keep Trump's approval from going to 37, holding it steady at 38
December 22, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Headlines that cause the rest for the world to spit-take.
Chicago just sold off its unpaid ambulance bills to debt collectors, to pay for an 8% increase in the police budget
December 22, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Seems worth noting at this point that Weiss's internal critics at the Times were correct and her many apologists among elite pundits were wrong
December 22, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Reposted by sekharn
Current issue of @theonion.com nails it again.
December 21, 2025 at 11:03 PM
Reposted by sekharn
All of these links went to promotion of this story earlier today. All these links are dead now — that's how thoroughly they've scrubbed this.
December 21, 2025 at 10:57 PM