Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
banner
scb250.bsky.social
Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
@scb250.bsky.social
He/Him | 27
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
I think we all deserve the endorphin release that her reaction will bring. Is that too much to ask?
January 2, 2026 at 11:39 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
It should also happen because quite frankly I want to watch Kemi immediately denounce the decision and then get asked in interviews about why government comms should be on a platform that allows CSAM. I want to watch her enthusiastically step on this rake
January 2, 2026 at 11:37 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
The year is 2028. A child pulls an ancient bottle from the mud on the banks of the Thames. It has a note inside. He turns to his father with a concerned face and says "Daddy, what does https:// mean?“
January 2, 2026 at 11:36 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
Indeed. I would love to pretend I have shifted over here because of my superior virtue, but it's because frankly I would be better off writing my pieces' HTML address on a piece of paper, putting the paper in a bottle, and throwing the bottle in the Thames and hoping it reaches an FT reader.
Lost amid the discussion of why the Government should get off X is its utter uselessness as an engagement tool and the fact departments are wasting vast sums making content for it. Take this:
January 2, 2026 at 11:21 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
guys, "the judges at the ICC are being sanctioned by the USA and can't access their iphones or bank accounts" and "why aren't any countries banning twitter or prosecuting elon musk for owning a site that manufactures CSAM" stories are the same story
January 2, 2026 at 6:58 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
any country that tries to express an opposition to CSAM will be rewarded with musk attempting to incite a far-right terrorist coup
guys, "the judges at the ICC are being sanctioned by the USA and can't access their iphones or bank accounts" and "why aren't any countries banning twitter or prosecuting elon musk for owning a site that manufactures CSAM" stories are the same story
January 2, 2026 at 7:00 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
Needless to say this is not happening but it does offer the immensely funny prospect of Blue Labour trying to defect to Reform en masse after Starmer resigns and Farage turning them away
January 2, 2026 at 1:24 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
The demand here is to basically dissolve civil society and elect a new one that'll take the Westminster bubble's fetishes seriously
January 2, 2026 at 1:20 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
This is also ass-backwards in my view, as the things he is mad about are politically difficult and administratively quite doable. The Treasury/DWP could probably put together the framework for cutting benefits in a couple of months even if implementation took time, but politically its not doable.
Just like the Tories, Labour's centrist hacks think themselves omniscient and infallible - they cannot fail, they can only be failed. So when they do fail, they blame everyone else.

We saw it with the Tories, and it's already started from the Starmerites with this idiotic dreck: archive.ph/rHoXA
January 2, 2026 at 1:16 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
do not post photos of your children online unless they are an incomprehensible mist creature who makes cameras glitch out and everyone who perceives them to start banging their heads against a wall
January 2, 2026 at 10:22 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
There is, to my mind, no justification for the continued use by the UK Government of X as a platform for official comms. There hasn't been for some time, in fact, but if the latest developments around AI-generated image abuse and CSAM don't change the policy I really don't know what will.
January 2, 2026 at 9:18 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
For this Technical Report, pieces of the Western Electric AN/BQR-15 passive towed array (Ohio- and Lafayette-class SSBN submarines) were allowed to be bitten by sharks, and the damage was assessed:

"Study of fish bite on the AN/BQR-15 towed array."
🔗 apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA...
January 2, 2026 at 9:06 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
This. They have no particular patriotism only allegiance to an eternal grift
January 2, 2026 at 7:53 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
The burning ambition of every british right winger on Twitter is to be a dancing monkey for American conservative influencers
January 2, 2026 at 7:48 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
sliwa correctly understanding that mamdani ran a very traditional campaign and thus surpassing the analytical ability of 80% if people who comment on politics for a living
this is the most incredible interview i’ve ever read. the aei guy tries so hard to get sliwa to trash mamdani and he simply won’t. he also brings up flaco (rip) unprompted.

www.wsj.com/opinion/free...
January 2, 2026 at 12:27 AM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
The American government of 2025 talks about ethnic cleansing and "management" with an openness that the Federal government of 1940 would have considered political suicide.
January 2, 2026 at 6:41 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
People are going to smugly tell Will he's wrong but there is a significant difference between random cranks on the fringe talking like this and civil authorities, something that has not been seen since the 1940s.
I’ve spent years shouting about how the internet was driving a resurgence in scientific racism, as a pretext for much more vulgar forms of racism. Nonetheless, “We should remove X and Y ethnic groups from the US” was not something you’d hear from anyone with even a hint of respectability until 2025.
Yeah they did, you just weren’t paying attention to the people telling you this.
January 2, 2026 at 6:39 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
something like this?
January 2, 2026 at 11:28 AM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
say goodbye to abundance and say hello to red plenty
Holy shit it's real
January 2, 2026 at 12:34 AM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
I think this is trend across all the services: looking for a service solution when there's a better joint solution.
January 2, 2026 at 4:19 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
This is a good write up of what we're seeing in mechanized warfare in Ukraine with good recommendations for the Army. But really, if the Army wants to avoid that kind of fight, they should be asking for a bigger Air Force.
warontherocks.com/2026/01/why-...
Why Mechanized Warfare Will Still Be Decisive in the Next Land War
Mechanized warfare is not dead. Observers have been debating this topic since the Ukrainian military and volunteers beat back the Russian assault on Kiev
warontherocks.com
January 2, 2026 at 4:18 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
Every other opinion column in an English-language paper these days is just 'random Labour/Democrat apparatchik explicitly opposes the concept of civil society'
Just like the Tories, Labour's centrist hacks think themselves omniscient and infallible - they cannot fail, they can only be failed. So when they do fail, they blame everyone else.

We saw it with the Tories, and it's already started from the Starmerites with this idiotic dreck: archive.ph/rHoXA
January 2, 2026 at 10:40 AM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
That "The pensioners who are renting peice" a few months ago did feel a bit like when you saw "There is some weird respiratory illness in Wuhan".
January 2, 2026 at 12:56 PM
Reposted by Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast
I need to stop going on about it, but there was an Economist piece last year going 'why are Labour spending so much money on social housing? It's sub-optimal', which, yeah, I agree, but guys, you know what is also sub-optimal: home ownership rates among 40-60 year olds!
January 2, 2026 at 12:44 PM