Jean Fisch
banner
jeanfisch.bsky.social
Jean Fisch
@jeanfisch.bsky.social
Analysis, rationalism & objectivity are my sins
Question to the experts: I have read the paper twice and still can't find a paragraph which lays out the analysis they made

Is it me or what did I miss? Thanks for any input
November 25, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Quick warning: A paper published by @royalsocietypublishing.org on mortality by State in Germany found that "the higher the vaccination rate, the higher the increase in excess in pandemic yr 3 vs 2"

The paper suspects vaccines as a cause... without a word on the huge flu wave that hit DE in yr 3 🙄
November 24, 2025 at 8:28 AM
Let me show how useless the conclusion of UK's covid inquiry is that "UK should have locked down 1 wk earlier"

Here the report of GOV UK of 10/3/2020:
- 373 cases, flatish
- 6 deaths

Is that the threshold to close 5d later next time (and take the full societal and economic hit)?

1/
November 23, 2025 at 9:32 AM
This one is to be framed: The covid pandemic debate since 2020, here illustrated on lockdowns

(extract from @whippletom.bsky.social's brilliant piece in the times yesterday: www.thetimes.com/article/3c7c...)
November 22, 2025 at 10:14 AM
Quick reality check for the "UK should have just followed the Swedish example" aficionados

If you believe that the raw figures of SE are telling for the UK, then logic tells you that UK/SE should have done what DK did😉

1/
November 22, 2025 at 8:32 AM
@cbsstatistiek.bsky.social (the Dutch Statistics Office) released today its monthly deaths by cause report up to May 2025

Here the situation for cancer vs. pre-pandemic trends
November 21, 2025 at 5:57 PM
I find the conclusion line of UK's covid inquiry poor
- "be more prudent next time" has zero actionable value
- Rationale put forward relies on counterfactuals and does not include that measures only delay never avoid

However, most of the report's critique is equally poor

1/
November 21, 2025 at 9:15 AM
CDC has created a page on autism and vaccines which says

So far, nobody has been able to unequivocally rule out a link

(among others, it claims that the large studies showing no link - all done outside the US - are not applicable to the US because of vax schedule differences)
November 20, 2025 at 7:45 AM
I read both in the US and in DE: "we had a pandemic plan, why the hell did we not stick to it ?!?"

I went through both plans: Neither includes any impact sizing on mortality

A plan without impact sizing is not a plan but a Kinder surprise egg: You may like the surprise... or not
November 16, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Sigh... "Could vaccines have caused big excess in England?" is brought up again by a British newspaper

So here is how excess looks like vs expected from pre-pandemic mortality trend once you account for covid, flu & heat

So the answer is known: "No the vaccines could not"

1/
November 16, 2025 at 8:45 AM
I missed this interesting paper: Swedish pharma-surveillance scientists reviewed the 456 reports of suspected fatality post vax in Sweden

They found 10 with clear vaccine link (amounting to the famous X per million also found elsewhere)

1/
November 14, 2025 at 4:47 PM
Also in Australia, covid cases, ICU and deaths evolve in sync with the expected delay of a week between each state

Interestingly, the "in hospital" data (stopped end of 2023) never showed the "lows" of the other indicators

This smells of significant in-hospital infections
November 14, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Covid is now clearly on a downward path in England too

(I remain full of admiration if this were to be the result of dark forces faking the presence of virus: Remember, this requires to phase the peaks with 7 days between cases, admissions and deaths and this across the whole health sector!)
November 13, 2025 at 11:26 AM
The illusion of a virus continues to be carried out to perfection in Germany:
- the personnel in the dozens of labs who establish + cases
- the nurses / doctors who report covid cases in hospitals
- the deaths registrars
managed to fake another synchronized downturn of covid

😀
November 11, 2025 at 12:04 PM
I am perplexed by this major new study of NHS England data among children on multiple accounts

a) It writes "risk is higher 12 months after infx than 4wks after vax" without showing that this comparison is meaningful (ie risk 12m after infx is linked to infx, not vax)

1/
November 5, 2025 at 10:19 AM
The healthy vaccinee effect runs deeper than we may think

What this full national Danish study shows is that a huge effect remains even after correcting for age, sex, comorbidity, medical visits and place of residence

The "unvaccinated by choice" test less (and die earlier)

1/
November 2, 2025 at 9:47 AM
This illustrates one of the things I don't understand with much of the "spun" affirmations from vax / pandemic management skeptics

You may get "15 minutes of fame" but the claims will fall apart the moment reality kicks in

www.reuters.com/business/hea...
www.reuters.com
October 31, 2025 at 7:05 AM
I just see that the Korean study that found higher cancer rates among vaccinated is being reviewed

Some may scream "censorship" but this is as clear a case of something gone wrong (and in good faith) as it gets

In fact one look at the official data would have raised the alarm

1/
October 26, 2025 at 11:44 AM
The public opinion is always right! (here in the UK)
- Jan 21: it was against reopening schools
- Oct 25: it thinks that school closure did more harm than good

(interestingly, the young believe closing schools did more GOOD than harm / it's the old which are of the opposite opinion)
October 22, 2025 at 11:13 AM
Just your regular reminder that UK mortality analysis on young people / external causes based on registrations are MATERIALLY distorted

(look here for suicides: the real trend is flat not growing)

The issue? ONS generally provides death data series based on registrations only
October 21, 2025 at 9:48 AM
Cancer patients who had covid jabs before treatment lived considerably longer

It would be beautifully ironic given the frantic efforts to whip up turbo-cancer

But alas, I fear it's simply a reflection of healthy vaccinee bias

www.statnews.com/2025/10/19/m...
mRNA Covid shots may boost the effects of certain cancer treatments, study suggests
The potential reasons that a Covid vaccine would help treat cancer are intriguing.
www.statnews.com
October 20, 2025 at 5:11 AM
A very interesting read about covid and how men and women react differently to an infection

(lots of "ahas" for me but then I know next to nothing so everything is new!)
Mechanisms of sex differences in acute and long COVID sequelae in mice

Pre-print. Does this model represent LongCovid or is it an infection model?

www.biorxiv.org/cont...
1/10
Mechanisms of sex differences in acute and long COVID sequelae in mice
While males are more likely to suffer severe outcomes during acute COVID-19, a greater proportion of females develop post-acute sequalae of COVID-19 (PASC) despite similar rates of infection. To identify mechanisms of PASC, mice were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and viral, inflammatory, and behavioral outcomes were evaluated through 84 days post infection. Sex differences were not observed in virus replication or persistence of viral RNA in pulmonary or extrapulmonary tissues in acute or PASC phases. Following recovery from infection, female mice exhibited persistent neurocognitive and behavioral impairments, along with greater frequencies of inflammatory myeloid subsets, neuroinflammation, and dysregulated T cell subsets, including Tregs. Sex differences in inflammation and cognitive phenotypes during PASC were mediated by the presence of two X chromosomes. XX animals independent of chromosome Y presented with neuroinflammation and PASC along with infection-induced upregulation of the X-linked genes Xist and Tlr7 that regulate inflammation and chronic disease outcomes. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. National Institutes of Health RECOVER administrative supplement to NIH/NIAID, U19AI159822-02S1 Fisher Center Discovery Program Johns Hopkins Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Response, BAA 75N93021C00045 NICHD, 5R01HD100298 NIH/NIA, 1R01AG082899
www.biorxiv.org
October 17, 2025 at 2:53 PM
The Dutch Statistics Office updated its dataset of monthly deaths by cause based on death certificates this morning

Here is the devastating impact of turbo cancer for everyone to see
October 17, 2025 at 10:42 AM
Interesting case on vaccine injuries in Italy: A civil tribunal condemned the Italian State to pay a woman an indemnity of €3k per month after she developed symptoms 1 week after the second dose which eventually led to her to no longer be able to walk
www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2025/10/14/d...
Danni neurologici da vaccino Covid: Tribunale condanna il Ministero a pagare
Il Tribunale di Asti ha riconosciuto il nesso tra vaccino Covid e gravi danni neurologici, condannando il Ministero della Salute a pagare un indennizzo mensile.
www.ilfattoquotidiano.it
October 15, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Today's UK covid inquiry's hearing included something I was not aware so far

A memo of 25/2/20 by UK's advisory group mentions that school closures in South-East Asia show a significant transmission impact

1/
October 14, 2025 at 11:43 AM