Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Eric Segall

@espinsegall.bsky.social

9.4K followers 1.1K following 3.9K posts

#Notacourt but yes a law prof

Eric J. Segall is an American legal scholar and the Ashe Family Chair Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law, where he has taught since 1991. He teaches classes on federal courts and constitutional law. .. more

Political science 50%

Law 26%

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Reposted by Cas Mudde, Eric J. Segall, David Darmofal

Justin Hendrix @justinhendrix.bsky.social · 9h

Quite a day.

33 560 1.3K

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 11h

Exactly

1 1

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

RI Smith @rismith.bsky.social · 11h

You see, the 13th-15th Amendments unconstitutionally discriminate against white Americans on the basis of race.

1 1 5

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 11h

The conservative justices are going to gut or overturn the Voting Rights Act protecting minority voters despite the fact that Congress, made up mostly of White representatives and senators, could repeal it if it wanted to.
Almost too much to bear.
#notacourt

2 2 10

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 16h

“The fundamental question is whether the Supreme Court recognizes that its most essential function is to defend the Constitution and the rule of law against an assault by an authoritarian president. The preliminary evidence is not encouraging.”
Yes.

1 1 4

Reposted by Michael E. Mann, Eric J. Segall

Pete Dominick @petedominick.bsky.social · 17h

I was the first to put the brilliant @peterhotezmdphd.bsky.social and @michaelemann.bsky.social together on air so I take FULL credit for their AMAZING new book "Science Under Siege"

Listen to my conversation with them after I give you today's most important news and clips

shorturl.at/AURNw

1 19 48

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

Michael C. Dorf @dorfonlaw.bsky.social · 18h

Following up on yesterday's SCOTUS oral argument, I continue my deep dive into whether Congress is forbidden from exercising its power under the Exceptions Clause in a way that impedes the Supreme Court's essential functions and, if so, what those functions are. Spoiler alert: it's complicated!

What are the "Essential Functions" of the Supreme Court?

Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bowe v. United States . In my Verdict column previewing the case, I highlighted the case...

www.dorfonlaw.org

1 10 26

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 1d

Where exactly in text or history or Blackstone’s fantasies does such a right exist? The hypocrisy of these two is never-ending.

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 1d

We agree on 98% of legal issues but my view is that the “Essential Functions Thesis” is, in might of clear text, “constitutional wishful thinking.” :)

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 1d

Congress’ powers are in Article I for a reason-sadly the people occupying that institution have forgotten that.

1 8

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

Michael C. Dorf @dorfonlaw.bsky.social · 1d

Oral argument today in Bowe v US presents one of the most profound constitutional questions: Just how much power does Article III's Exceptions Clause give Congress to strip SCOTUS of appellate jurisdiction? I offer some history and context in my latest column for @justiaverdict.bsky.social 👇

Will SCOTUS Decide What Its “Essential Functions” Are?

Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Bowe v. United States, which raises the question of whether limits on successive habeas petitions for state prisoners also a...

verdict.justia.com

3 53 110

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 2d

A friend is on a metal tube 35,000 feet in the air and watching the Falcons while talking to me on a little box.
Think about it.

1 21

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 2d

I miss his writing.

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 2d

There’s no other kind.

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 2d

“Just as the President can have “[t]he executive Power” without being able to structure the executive branch as the President pleases, so too I do not think that the very definition of “[t]he executive Power” includes removal authority.” Yes.
democracyproject.org/posts/must-a...

Special Feature: Must Administrative Officers Serve at the President’s Pleasure?

A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.

democracyproject.org

1 1 3

Reposted by Rebecca Tushnet, Margot C. Finn, Nathan Richardson , and 1 more Rebecca Tushnet, Margot C. Finn, Nathan Richardson, Eric J. Segall

Reuters Legal @legal.reuters.com · 2d

A conservative legal group has ended a discrimination lawsuit against the University of Michigan’s flagship law journal.

Conservative group ends discrimination lawsuit against Michigan Law Review

A conservative legal group has ended a discrimination lawsuit against the University of Michigan’s flagship law journal.

reut.rs

3 4 62

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 2d

At the Court, Originalism is what result they want.

1 8

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

Hollywood DFPD @hollywooddfpd.bsky.social · 2d

The unitary executive theory is toast.

Originalist ‘Bombshell’ Complicates Case on Trump’s Power to Fire Officials

www.nytimes.com

1 1

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 3d

Justice Barrett’s mentor Justice Scalia admitted he only read news from a few outlets that of course shared his views. She is actually like him in many ways she did not display when she was a law professor.
Sigh.

1 4

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 3d

Maybe Justice Barrett Should Be Calling for Having Conversations with Those One Disagrees with through a Network in Addition to FOX News or Other Friendly Outlets and Journalists electionlawblog.org?p=152463

Maybe Justice Barrett Should Be Calling for Having Conversations with Those One Disagrees with through a Network in Addition to FOX News or Other Friendly Outlets and Journalists #ELB

From Politico’s roundup of this morning’s Sunday talk shows: Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett on having conversations amid a wave of political violence, on “Fox News Sunday”: “I feel like when ...

electionlawblog.org

3 10 38

Reposted by Karen Benjamin Guzzo, Christina Ho, Eric J. Segall

Alice Miranda Ollstein @alicemiranda.bsky.social · 3d

A decades-old problem (underrepresentation of all women, but especially pregnant women, in medical research) is getting worse.

Post-Dobbs, “fear of liability is a regularly cited obstacle” to enrolling pregnant women in medical studies, according to a 2024 @nationalacademies.org report.

RFK Jr.’s got advice for pregnant women. There’s limited data to support it.

Women of reproductive age have long been missing from clinical trials. It’s getting worse where abortion is banned.

www.politico.com

1 4 9

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 5d

I was a guest on this podcast talking about teaching con law in the age of Trump. I start at the 10 minute mark.
I don’t hold back.

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/l...

Ep 172 — Law School In The Age Of Trump (Ft. Prof. Eric Segall)

Podcast Episode · Law and Chaos · 10/10/2025 · 1h 6m

podcasts.apple.com

2 9

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

Liz Dye @lizdye.bsky.social · 5d

How can you teach law school when SCOTUS is setting fire to a new precedent every day? Here's hoping @espinsegall.bsky.social can explain it to us!

with @andrewtorrez.bsky.social

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/e...

Ep 172 — Law School In The Age Of Trump (Ft. Prof. Eric Segall)

Podcast Episode · Law and Chaos · 10/10/2025 · 1h 6m

podcasts.apple.com

2 13 64

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

NY Times Pitchbot @nytpitchbot.bsky.social · 6d

Serious question: does there come a point where everyone admits that Constitutional originalism is just a made-up vibe-based philosophy that gives Republican judges a pretext for ruling however it is that Republicans want them to rule?

110 210 1.6K

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

Yashar Ali 🐘 @yasharali.bsky.social · 6d

BREAKING

New York Attorney General Letitia James has been indicted by the US Department of Justice.

39 55 180

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

Pete Coe @petecoevo.bsky.social · 6d

Hey @espinsegall.bsky.social thanks for being on the pod w/ @petedominick.bsky.social. Everybody's favorite news & audio round up plus this great guest & Pete on Rick Smith's Pod! What more do you want, listeners?! 🦅 standupwithpete.com/1455-eric-se...

1455 Eric Segall and Me on The Rick Smith Show + News and Clips | Stand Up! with Pete Dominick

standupwithpete.com

1 5

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 6d

“‘The stakes are quite large’: US supreme court case could gut Voting Rights Act” electionlawblog.org?p=152427

"'The stakes are quite large': US supreme court case could gut Voting Rights Act" #ELB

Sam Levine with a deep dive on Callais for The Guardian.

electionlawblog.org

1 9 13

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 6d

Thanks!

Eric Segall @espinsegall.bsky.social · 6d

What I’ve said is the Court isn’t a real court which is not exactly the same thing. And my critique, FWIW, is non-partisan. Just don’t give gov’t officials effectively unreviewable power for life and expect them to act like judges, especially when their binding document is often hopelessly unclear.

Reposted by Eric J. Segall

Pete Dominick @petedominick.bsky.social · 6d

I host a daily podcast. There are no ads. I recap the news with clips and talk to the smartest people around.

Today I have Con law prof @espinsegall.bsky.social

standupwithpete.libsyn.com/1455-eric-se...

1 9 37