www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-...
www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-...
www.military.com/feature/2025...
www.military.com/feature/2025...
www.military.com/feature/2025...
Prolific and MTurk have been poisoned wells for a few years now, LLMs won’t dramatically depreciate them further
This is definitely a concern, but (FWIW) I am highly skeptical that typical survey respondents have the technical skills (let alone the inclination) to do all of this.
With current technology, it is impossible to tell whether survey respondents are real or bots. Among other things, makes it easy for bad actors to manipulate outcomes. No good news here for the future of online-based survey research
Prolific and MTurk have been poisoned wells for a few years now, LLMs won’t dramatically depreciate them further
📸 My husband
📸 My husband
Gas on post yesterday: $2.53
Gas on post today: $2.85
Don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining.
Gas on post yesterday: $2.53
Gas on post today: $2.85
Don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining.
My husband: we live in the house with both garage doors open.
Neighbor: the one with the jeeps? YOU HAVE A KID?!?
🤣😂🤣
My husband: we live in the house with both garage doors open.
Neighbor: the one with the jeeps? YOU HAVE A KID?!?
🤣😂🤣
My husband: we live in that house with the garage doors open.
Neighbor: the one with the jeeps? YOU HAVE A KID?!?
🤣
My husband: we live in that house with the garage doors open.
Neighbor: the one with the jeeps? YOU HAVE A KID?!?
🤣
environmentamerica.org/articles/epa...
environmentamerica.org/articles/epa...
📸 Kristin L Raught
📸 Kristin L Raught
It's also needless because Congress would easily pass a troop pay bill if Johnson were willing to gavel in.
Long thread.
It's also needless because Congress would easily pass a troop pay bill if Johnson were willing to gavel in.
Long thread.
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...