☝️SoSayU
@sosayu.bsky.social
2.2K followers 2.4K following 2.3K posts
Humanist, Dogist, Lifelong Liberal. I’m really just here for the news.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
sosayu.bsky.social
“Because if the only answer is—

Democrats have to be perfect. They must only put forward flawless candidates. They can hold no unpopular ideas. They shall communicate effectively. They may never preside over a war or a recession.

—well, then we’re fucked.”
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
thebulwark.com
At the end of the day, Republican voters themselves are going to have to reject this stuff. There is no guarantee that what has to happen will happen. www.thebulwark.com/p/all-the-pr...
All the Pretty Little Nazis
The shape of things to come.
www.thebulwark.com
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
sosayu.bsky.social
Trump is tearing this country apart limb by limb and his voters are about to lose both arms and legs. I can only hope that makes their eyes and ears stronger.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
I think there are five levels of potential badness here. Once you've decided to violate the ADA, you're only bound by self-imposed limitations. But depending on what the White House is self-imposing, this can range from "BAD" to "The Republic has fallen, pack it in."
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
So just how bad is this? I got a text from an appropriator friend saying "The Republic has fallen. Pack it in."
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
And the craziest part is this was needless. Congress would've passed a military pay bill with near unanimous support! Congressional Ds have been begging Rs to bring a bill to pay the military to the floor! But Johnson refuses to gavel in because he doesn't want an Epstein vote.
Johnson wearing a jacket that's photoshopped to say "this has nothing to do with epstein"
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
That is profoundly illegal. You may not spend money on a purpose without funding. The constitution expressly forbids it, as does the ADA.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
The White House told approps they would not be transferring the money. Not now, not ever. They said, explicitly, that they'd use RDTE money on milpers.

Direct deposits went out yesterday. No transfers happened. They spent RDTE money, which can only be used on RDTE, on milpers.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
But here's the problem: if you tried to transfer that money into the military personnel accounts (milpers), it would immediately transform into money whose period of availability ended on September 30, 2025 - and thus not be usable anymore, despite the money existing.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
In the case of DOD, there's a limit of $8 billion. And, importantly, when you move money from one account to another account, that money has follow the allowable uses and the period of availability of that new account. So now let's dig into the specifics.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
When money is appropriated, it's also authorized to be used only for certain activities. So if you give $50 million to the Department of Transportation to build bridges, it couldn't use that money to build airports instead.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
Military pay is appropriated one year at a time, with a one-year period of availability. The fiscal year ended on September 30th, and we did not pass new appropriations bills (the government is shut down), so there's no money available to pay the troops (or to do lots of things).
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
Most money has what's called a period of availability. You can go about obligating it only during that period. While it's illegal to not use it all (that's the illegal impoundments Trump has been doing all year), after that period of availability ends, you can't use it anymore.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
Under the Constitution and under the ADA, it is illegal to spend money without funding for that purpose. The president may not spend money to do something unless there's actually money to carry it out and that action is expressly allowed.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C7-1/ALDE_00001095/
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
The mechanism through which Trump is paying the troops is the most blatant large Antideficiency Act (ADA) violation in US history. It's also clearly willful. No one has been charged under the ADA before, but violations carry a two-year jail term. The statute of limitations is five years.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
bbkogan.bsky.social
Trump's mechanism to pay the troops during the shutdown is by far the most illegal budgetary action he's taken as POTUS, potentially setting the stage to break everything.

It's also needless because Congress would easily pass a troop pay bill if Johnson were willing to gavel in.

Long thread.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/10/national-security-presidential-memorandum-nspm-8/
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
rebeccasolnit.bsky.social
This is also helpful.
bbkogan.bsky.social
Trump's mechanism to pay the troops during the shutdown is by far the most illegal budgetary action he's taken as POTUS, potentially setting the stage to break everything.

It's also needless because Congress would easily pass a troop pay bill if Johnson were willing to gavel in.

Long thread.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/10/national-security-presidential-memorandum-nspm-8/
sosayu.bsky.social
The insanity of the whitewashing & gaslighting by the media on top of the whitewashing & gaslighting of this administration and the GOP & the gaslighting from SCOTUS may just send us all over the edge.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
rebeccasolnit.bsky.social
What's your rewrite? "President Trump on Wednesday issued a document claiming he could grant himself powers not granted to him to snatch up federal funds the Constitution grants Congress jurisdiction over, in a move sure to meet with legal challenges."
nytimes.com
President Trump on Wednesday signed a memorandum expanding his administration’s authority to repurpose unspent federal funds to pay members of the military during the government shutdown, escalating his challenge to the authority of Congress on spending matters.
Trump Signs Memo Expanding His Authority to Spend Federal Money
The president gave Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wide authority to repurpose funds to pay members of the military without approval from Congress, which has the sole constitutional authority to decide federal spending.
nyti.ms
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
prchovanec.bsky.social
Whatever you think about CFPB, it was created by Congress (as part of the Dodd-Frank Act) and can only be abolished by Congress, not by the President acting as a dictator.
Reposted by ☝️SoSayU
prchovanec.bsky.social
Can't emphasize enough how truly disgusting it is for any political commentator to call an African-American member of Congress someone's "slave".
tomjoscelyn.bsky.social
Hakeem Jeffries posted pictures of two Rep. Members posing with “Young Republicans” who were part of a racist text thread (as reported by Politico).

In response, Mike Davis (well-connected in Trump World & on the Hill) called Jeffries a “house slave” for George Soros - proving Jeffries’ point.
Mike Davis racist smear